본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

만성 뇌졸중 환자의 참여제한에 활동과 가족지지가 미치는 영향

The Effects of Activity and Family Support on the Participation Restriction of Chronic Stroke Patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors determining the participation restriction of chronic stroke patients based on international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) model. Sixty-eight stroke patients participated. The participants were assessed participation restriction using the Korean version of London handicap scale (K-LHS), modified Barthel index (K-MBI) to measure activities of daily living, Berg balance scale (K-BBS) to assess balance, and the center for epidemiologic studies depression (K-CES-D) to gauge depression. Also, 3 minutes walking test (3MWT), gait velocity, asymmetric posture, and family support were assessed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to explore the factors determining participation restriction. There were no significant different in the K-LHS and K-MBI results by gender (p>.05). Correlations between the K-LHS and K-MBI (r=-.656), K-BBS (r=-.543), K-CES-D (r=.266), 3MWT (r=-.363), gait velocity (r=.348), and family support (r=-.389) were significant (p<.05). Also, the K-MBI and family support were the factors that determined participation restriction (p<.05) and that 40.2% of the variation in the K-LHS can be explained. Therefore, it is suggested that evaluation and intervention of patient's activity level and extent of family support is necessary to reduce participation restriction of chronic stroke patients.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors determining the participation restriction of chronic stroke patients based on international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) model. Sixty-eight stroke patients participated. The participants were assessed participation restriction using the Korean version of London handicap scale (K-LHS), modified Barthel index (K-MBI) to measure activities of daily living, Berg balance scale (K-BBS) to assess balance, and the center for epidemiologic studies depression (K-CES-D) to gauge depression. Also, 3 minutes walking test (3MWT), gait velocity, asymmetric posture, and family support were assessed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to explore the factors determining participation restriction. There were no significant different in the K-LHS and K-MBI results by gender (p>.05). Correlations between the K-LHS and K-MBI (r=-.656), K-BBS (r=-.543), K-CES-D (r=.266), 3MWT (r=-.363), gait velocity (r=.348), and family support (r=-.389) were significant (p<.05). Also, the K-MBI and family support were the factors that determined participation restriction (p<.05) and that 40.2% of the variation in the K-LHS can be explained. Therefore, it is suggested that evaluation and intervention of patient's activity level and extent of family support is necessary to reduce participation restriction of chronic stroke patients.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 강성규, "가족기능도지수(Family APGAR Scores)에 관한 기초조사 연구", 가정의학회지, 5(12), pp.6~13 (1984)
  2. 김원호, "물리치료학 연구방법론", pp.49~50 (2010), 정담미디어
  3. 정한영, "한글화된 Berg 균형검사법의 신뢰도 분석", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30(6), pp.611~618 (2006), 대한재활의학회
  4. 정한영, "한글판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(3), pp.283~297 (2007), 대한재활의학회
  5. 정혜영, "뇌졸중 환자의 작업치료 중재 결과를 측정하기 위해 사용된 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰", 대한작업치료학회지, 17(3), pp.79~95 (2009), 대한작업치료학회
  6. 최유임, "한국어판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도", 한국산학기술학회지, 12(11), pp.5102~5019 (2011)
  7. Berg K, "Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument", Physiother Can, 41(6), pp.304~311 (1989)
  8. Chau JP, "Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: A path analysis", BMC Neurol, 9, pp.49~ (2009)
  9. Chon KK, "Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D", Korean J Clin Psychol, 11(1), pp.65~76 (1992)
  10. Clarke PJ, "Handicap in stroke survivors", Disabil Rehabil, 21(3), pp.116~123 (1999)
  11. D’Alisa S, "How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors", Acta Neurol Scand, 112(3), pp.157~162 (2005)
  12. Desrosiers J, "Predictors of long-term participation after stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 28(4), pp.221~230 (2006)
  13. Eng JJ, "Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion", Stroke, 33(3), pp.756~761 (2002)
  14. Gadidi V, "Long-term outcome poststroke: Predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92(11), pp.1802~1808 (2011)
  15. Goonetilleke A, "Validity of the London handicap scale", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 58(1), pp.125~126 (1995)
  16. Granger CV, "Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 60(4), pp.145~154 (1979)
  17. Green J, "Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke", Clin Rehabil, 16(3), pp.306~314 (2002)
  18. Gurr B., "Stroke mood screening on an inpatient stroke unit", Br J Nurs, 20(2), pp.94~99 (2011)
  19. Hajek VE, "Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78(12), pp.1331~1337 (1997)
  20. Hamzat TK, "Motor function and participation among Nigerian stroke survivors: 6-month follow-up study", NeuroRehabilitation, 25(2), pp.137~142 (2009)
  21. Hartman-Maeir A, "Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 29(7), pp.559~566 (2007)
  22. Harwood RH, "Measuring the outcomes of day hospital attendance: A comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale", Clin Rehabil, 14(5), pp.527~531 (2000)
  23. Harwood RH, "Handicap one year after a stroke: Validity of a new scale", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 57(7), pp.825~829 (1994)
  24. Harwood RH, "Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 19(5), pp.205~211 (1997)
  25. Hershkovitz A, "Is a day hospital rehabilitation programme associated with reduction of handicap in stroke patients", Clin Rehabil, 18(3), pp.261~266 (2004)
  26. Iriberri M, "Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test", Respir Med, 96(10), pp.812~816 (2002)
  27. Jenkinson C, "The London handicap scale: A re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 68(3), pp.365~367 (2000)
  28. Kim WH, "Causal relation between spasticity, strength, gross motor function, and functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy: A path analysis", Dev Med Child Neurol, 53(1), pp.68~73 (2011)
  29. King RB., "Quality of life after stroke", Stroke, 27(9), pp.1467~1472 (1996)
  30. Kneebone II, "Psychological management of post-stroke depression", Br J Clin Psychol, 39(Pt 1), pp.53~65 (2000)
  31. Kwok T, "A comparison of the long-term health related quality of life and handicap of stroke patients in Mainland China and Hong Kong", Health Services Insights, 3, pp.13~20 (2010)
  32. Kwok T, "Quality of life of stroke survivors: A 1-year follow-up study", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(9), pp.1177~1182 (2006)
  33. LeBrasseur NK, "Muscle impairments and behavioral factors mediate functional limitations and disability following stroke", Phys Ther, 86(10), pp.1342~1350 (2006)
  34. Lo RS, "Handicap and its determinants of change in stroke survivors: One-year follow-up study", Stroke, 39(1), pp.148~153 (2008)
  35. Lord SE, "Visual gait analysis: The development of a clinical assessment and scale", Clin Rehabil, 12(2), pp.107~119 (1998)
  36. Maeshima S, "Mobility and muscle strength contralateral to hemiplegia from stroke: Benefit from self-training with family support", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 82(6), pp.456~462 (2003)
  37. Mandich AD, "Rites of passage: Understanding participation of children with developmental coordination disorder", Hum Mov Sci, 22(4-5), pp.583~595 (2003)
  38. Mercier L, "Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke", Stroke, 32(11), pp.2602~2608 (2001)
  39. O’Sullivan SB, "Physical Rehabilitation. 5th ed", pp.718~726 (2006), F.A. Davis Co
  40. Patel M, "Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery", Clin Rehabil, 17(2), pp.158~166 (2003)
  41. Perenboom RJ, "Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)", Disabil Rehabil, 25(11-12), pp.577~587 (2003)
  42. Plante M, "Association between daily activities following stroke rehabilitation and social role functioning upon return to the community", Top Stroke Rehabil, 17(1), pp.47~57 (2010)
  43. Poulin V, "Participation after stroke: Comparing proxies' and patients' perceptions", J Rehabil Med, 40(1), pp.28~35 (2008)
  44. Quinn L, "Documentation for Rehabilitation: A guide to clinical decision making. 2nd ed", pp.75~78 (2009), Saunders
  45. Radloff LS., "The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population", Appl Psychol Meas, 1(3), pp.385~401 (1977)
  46. Salter KL, "Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions", Int J Rehabil Res, 30(4), pp.339~342 (2007)
  47. Seki M, "Characteristics of hemiplegic outpatients with stroke who try to remove their clothes unnecessarily", Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 28(1), pp.71~74 (2001)
  48. Smilkstein G, "Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function", J Fam Pract, 15(2), pp.303~311 (1982)
  49. Studenski S, "Bradypedia: Is gait speed ready for clinical use", J Nutr Health Aging, 13(10), pp.878~880 (2009)
  50. Sturm JW, "Handicap after stroke: How does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype?: The north North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)", Stroke, 33(3), pp.762~768 (2002)
  51. Sturm JW, "Determinants of handicap after stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)", Stroke, 35(3), pp.715~720 (2004)
  52. van Brakel WH, "The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in pubic health", Disabil Rehabil, 28(4), pp.193~203 (2006)
  53. Verbrugge LM, "The disablement process", Soc Sci Med, 38(1), pp.1~14 (1994)
  54. Westergren A, "Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale", Qual Life Res, 15(7), pp.1251~1256 (2006)
  55. White JH, "Community-dwelling stroke survivors: Function is not the whole story with quality of life", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(9), pp.1140~1146 (2007)
  56. Whiteneck GG, "Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73(6), pp.519~526 (1992)
  57. Woo J, "Survival, disability, and residence 20 months after acute stroke in a Chinese population: Implications for community care", Disabil Rehabil, 14(1), pp.36~40 (1992)
  58. World Health Organization, "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 1st ed", pp.3~18 (2001), World Health Organization

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)