본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Precise base editing without unintended indels in human cells and mouse primary myoblasts

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류생화학

초록

Base editors are powerful tools for making precise single-nucleotide changes in the genome. However, they can lead to unintended insertions and deletions at the target sites, which is a significant limitation for clinical applications. In this study, we aimed to eliminate unwanted indels at the target sites caused by various evolved base editors. Accordingly, we applied dead Cas9 instead of nickase Cas9 in the base editors to induce accurate substitutions without indels. Additionally, we tested the use of chromatin-modulating peptides in the base editors to improve nucleotide conversion efficiency. We found that using both dead Cas9 and chromatin-modulating peptides in base editing improved the nucleotide substitution efficiency without unintended indel mutations at the desired target sites in human cell lines and mouse primary myoblasts. Furthermore, the proposed scheme had fewer off-target effects than conventional base editors at the DNA level. These results indicate that the suggested approach is promising for the development of more accurate and safer base editing techniques for use in clinical applications.

Abstract

Base editors are powerful tools for making precise single-nucleotide changes in the genome. However, they can lead to unintended insertions and deletions at the target sites, which is a significant limitation for clinical applications. In this study, we aimed to eliminate unwanted indels at the target sites caused by various evolved base editors. Accordingly, we applied dead Cas9 instead of nickase Cas9 in the base editors to induce accurate substitutions without indels. Additionally, we tested the use of chromatin-modulating peptides in the base editors to improve nucleotide conversion efficiency. We found that using both dead Cas9 and chromatin-modulating peptides in base editing improved the nucleotide substitution efficiency without unintended indel mutations at the desired target sites in human cell lines and mouse primary myoblasts. Furthermore, the proposed scheme had fewer off-target effects than conventional base editors at the DNA level. These results indicate that the suggested approach is promising for the development of more accurate and safer base editing techniques for use in clinical applications.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Jinek, M., "A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity", Science, 337, pp.816~821 (2012)
  2. Rouet, P., "Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease", Mol. Cell. Biol, 14, pp.8096~8106 (1994)
  3. Chapman, J. R., "Playing the end game : DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice", Mol. Cell, 47, pp.497~510 (2012)
  4. Doudna, J. A., "Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9", Science, 346, pp.1258096~ (2014)
  5. Hsu, P. D., "Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering", Cell, 157, pp.1262~1278 (2014)
  6. Sander, J. D., "CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes", Nat. Biotechnol, 32, pp.347~355 (2014)
  7. Gallagher, D. N., "Repair of a site-specific DNA cleavage : old-school lessons for Cas9-mediated gene editing", ACS Chem. Biol, 13, pp.397~405 (2018)
  8. Rothkamm, K., "Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle", Mol. Cell Biol, 23, pp.5706~5715 (2003)
  9. Ciccia, A, "The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives", Mol. Cell, 40, pp.179~204 (2010)
  10. Heyer, W. D., "Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes", Annu Rev. Genet, 44, pp.113~139 (2010)
  11. Iyama, T., "DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells", DNA Repair, 12, pp.620~636 (2013)
  12. Lin, S., "Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR", Cas9 delivery, 2014, pp.3, e04766~
  13. Song, F., "Optimizing the DNA donor template for homology-directed repair of double-strand breaks", Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids, 7, pp.53~60 (2017)
  14. Bollen, Y., "How to create state-of-the-art genetic model systems : strategies for optimal CRISPR-mediated genome editing", Nucleic Acids Res, 46, pp.6435~6454 (2018)
  15. Komor, A. C., "Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage", Nature, 533, pp.420~424 (2016)
  16. Gaudelli, N. M., "Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage", Nature, 551, pp.464~471 (2017)
  17. Marraffini, L. A, "CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea", Nat. Rev. Genet, 11, pp.181~190 (2010)
  18. Kim, Y. B., "Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions", Nat. Biotechnol, 35, pp.371~376 (2017)
  19. Landrum, M. J., "ClinVar : public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype", Nucleic Acids Res, 42, pp.D980~D985 (2014)
  20. Landrum, M. J., "ClinVar : public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants", Nucleic Acids Res, 44, pp.D862~D868 (2016)
  21. Koblan, L. W., "Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction", Nat. Biotechnol, 36, pp.843~846 (2018)
  22. Grünewald, J., "A dual-deaminase CRISPR base editor enables concurrent adenine and cytosine editing", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.861~864 (2020)
  23. Sakata, R. C., "Base editors for simultaneous introduction of C-to-T and A-to-G mutations", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.865~869 (2020)
  24. Zhang, X., "Dual base editor catalyzes both cytosine and adenine base conversions in human cells", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.856~860 (2020)
  25. Nishimasu, H., "Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space", Science, 361, pp.1259~1262 (2018)
  26. Walton, R. T., "Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants", Science, 368, pp.290~296 (2020)
  27. Chen, L., "Programmable C : G to G : C genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9-directed base excision repair proteins", Nat. Commun, 12, pp.1~7 (2021)
  28. Sun, N., "Reconstructed glycosylase base editors GBE2. 0 with enhanced C-to-G base editing efficiency and purity", Mol. Therapy, 30, pp.2452~2463 (2022)
  29. Liang, Y., "AGBE : a dual deaminase-mediated base editor by fusing CGBE with ABE for creating a saturated mutant population with multiple editing patterns", Nucleic Acids Res, 50, pp.5384~5399 (2022)
  30. Kim, K., "Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos", Nat. Biotechnol, 35, pp.435~437 (2017)
  31. Richter, M. F., "Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.883~891 (2020)
  32. Rothgangl, T., "In vivo adenine base editing of PCSK9 in macaques reduces LDL cholesterol levels", Nat. Biotechnol, 39, pp.949~957 (2021)
  33. Kim, K., "Genome surgery using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration", Genome Res, 27, pp.419~426 (2017)
  34. Kodaka, Y., "Spin infection enables efficient gene delivery to muscle stem cells", Biotechniques, 63, pp.72~76 (2017)
  35. Bois, P. R., "FKHR(FOXO1a)is required for myotube fusion of primary mouse myoblasts", EMBO J, 22, pp.1147~1157 (2003)
  36. Bae, S., "Cas-OFFinder : a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases", Bioinformatics, 30, pp.1473~1475 (2014)
  37. Ryu, S. M., "Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy", Nat. Biotechnol, 36, pp.536~539 (2018)
  38. Nickoloff, J. A., "Exploiting DNA repair pathways for tumor sensitization, mitigation of resistance, and normal tissue protection in radiotherapy", Cancer Drug Resist, 4, pp.244~263 (2021)
  39. Wolter, F., "Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants", Plant Cell, 33, pp.3454~3469 (2021)
  40. Nambiar, T. S., "CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair", Mol. Cell, 82, pp.348~388 (2022)
  41. Ding, X., "Improving CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing efficiency by fusion with chromatin-modulating peptides", CRISPR J, 2, pp.51~63 (2019)
  42. Park, S. -J., "Targeted mutagenesis in mouse cells and embryos using an enhanced prime editor", Genome Biol, 22, pp.1~11 (2021)
  43. Anzalone, A. V., "Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA", Nature, 576, pp.149~157 (2019)
  44. Chen, L., "Adenine transversion editors enable precise, efficient A*T-to-C*G base editing in mammalian cells and embryos", Nat. Biotechnol (2023)[DOI]
  45. Grunewald, J., "Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors", Nature, 569, pp.433~437 (2019)
  46. Grunewald, J., "CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities", Nat. Biotechnol, 37, pp.1041~1048 (2019)
  47. Zhou, C., "Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis", Nature, 571, pp.275~278 (2019)
  48. Rees, H. A., "Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors", Sci. Adv, 5, pp.eaax5717~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (225건)