본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evolution of CRISPR towards accurate and efficient mammal genome engineering

김경미|허준석|류석민
생화학분자생물학회 (Korean Society Of Biochemistry And Molecular Biology)|2019.08|BMB Reports|제52권 제8호|pp. 475-481|DOI https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.8.149

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Genome editingHDRCRISPRNHEJDNA double-strand break
주제분류화학

초록

The evolution of genome editing technology based on CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) system has led to a paradigm shift in biological research. CRISPR/Cas9-guide RNA complexes enable rapid and efficient genome editing in mammalian cells. This system induces double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) at target sites and most DNA breakages induce mutations as small insertions or deletions (indels) by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway. However, for more precise correction as knock-in or replacement of DNA base pairs, using the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway is essential. Until now, many trials have greatly enhanced knock-in or substitution efficiency by increasing HDR efficiency, or newly developed methods such as Base Editors (BEs). However, accuracy remains unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarize studies to overcome the limitations of HDR using the CRISPR system and discuss future direction.

Abstract

The evolution of genome editing technology based on CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) system has led to a paradigm shift in biological research. CRISPR/Cas9-guide RNA complexes enable rapid and efficient genome editing in mammalian cells. This system induces double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) at target sites and most DNA breakages induce mutations as small insertions or deletions (indels) by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway. However, for more precise correction as knock-in or replacement of DNA base pairs, using the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway is essential. Until now, many trials have greatly enhanced knock-in or substitution efficiency by increasing HDR efficiency, or newly developed methods such as Base Editors (BEs). However, accuracy remains unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarize studies to overcome the limitations of HDR using the CRISPR system and discuss future direction.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. Wang H, "One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR", Cas-mediated genome engineering, 2013, pp.153, 910~918
  2. Yang H, "One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR", Cas-mediated genome engineering, 2013, pp.154, 1370~1379
  3. Barrangou R, "CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes", Science, 315, pp.1709~1712 (2007)
  4. Horvath P, "CRISPR", Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea, 2010, pp.327, 167~170
  5. Terns MP, "CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems", Curr Opin Microbiol, 14, pp.321~327 (2011)
  6. Bhaya D, "CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea : versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation", Annu Rev Genet, 45, pp.273~297 (2011)
  7. Cho SW, "Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9RNA-guided endonuclease", Nat Biotechnol, 31, pp.230~232 (2013)
  8. Cong L, "Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR", Cas systems, 2013, pp.339, 819~823
  9. Jiang W, "RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems", Nat Biotechnol, 31, pp.233~239 (2013)
  10. Jinek M, "A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity", Science, 337, pp.816~821 (2012)
  11. Mali P, "RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9", Science, 339, pp.823~826 (2013)
  12. Hsu PD, "Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering", Cell, 157, pp.1262~1278 (2014)
  13. Woo JW, "DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9ribonucleoproteins", Nat Biotechnol, 33, pp.1162~1164 (2015)
  14. Amoasii L, "Gene editing restores dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy", Science, 362, pp.86~91 (2018)
  15. Niu D, "Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9", Science, 357, pp.1303~1307 (2017)
  16. Liang F, "Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95, pp.5172~5177 (1998)
  17. Kakarougkas A, "DNA DSB repair pathway choice : an orchestrated handover mechanism", Br J Radiol, 87, pp.20130685~ (2014)
  18. Lindahl T, "DNA repair enzymes", Annu Rev Biochem, 51, pp.61~87 (1982)
  19. Steentoft C, "Mining the O-glycoproteome using zinc-finger nuclease-glycoengineered SimpleCell lines", Nat Methods, 8, pp.977~982 (2011)
  20. Kim Y, "A library of TAL effector nucleases spanning the human genome", Nat Biotechnol, 31, pp.251~258 (2013)
  21. Lehner K, "Frameshift mutagenesis : the roles of primertemplate misalignment and the nonhomologous end-joining pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae", Genetics, 190, pp.501~510 (2012)
  22. Smithies O, "Insertion of DNA sequences into the human chromosomal beta-globin locus by homologous recombination", Nature, 317, pp.230~234 (1985)
  23. Zelensky AN, "Inactivation of Pol theta and C-NHEJ eliminates off-target integration of exogenous DNA", Nat Commun, 8, pp.66~ (2017)
  24. Schimmel J, "Mutational signatures of non-homologous and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining in embryonic stem cells", EMBO J, 36, pp.3634~3649 (2017)
  25. Mateos-Gomez PA, "The helicase domain of Poltheta counteracts RPA to promote alt-NHEJ", Nat Struct Mol Biol, 24, pp.1116~1123 (2017)
  26. Rees HA, "Base editing : precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells", Nat Rev Genet, 19, pp.770~788 (2018)
  27. Kim JS, "Precision genome engineering through adenine and cytosine base editing", Nat Plants, 4, pp.148~151 (2018)
  28. Komor AC, "Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage", Nature, 533, pp.420~424 (2016)
  29. Nishida K, "Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems", Science, 353 (2016)
  30. Gaudelli NM, "Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage", Nature, 551, pp.464~471 (2017)
  31. Kim K, "Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos", Nat Biotechnol, 35, pp.435~437 (2017)
  32. Ryu SM, "Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy", Nat Biotechnol, 36, pp.536~539 (2018)
  33. Liang P, "Correction of beta-thalassemia mutant by base editor in human embryos", Protein Cell, 8, pp.811~822 (2017)
  34. Liu Z, "Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in rabbit", Nat Commun, 9, pp.2717~ (2018)
  35. Yeh WH, "In vivo base editing of post-mitotic sensory cells", Nat Commun, 9, pp.2184~ (2018)
  36. Chang HHY, "Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair", Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 18, pp.495~506 (2017)
  37. 이승환, "CRISPR and Target-Specific DNA Endonucleases for Efficient DNA Knock-in in Eukaryotic Genomes", Molecules and Cells, 41(11), pp.943~952 (2018), 한국분자세포생물학회[DOI]
  38. Cox DB, "Therapeutic genome editing : prospects and challenges", Nat Med, 21, pp.121~131 (2015)
  39. Renaud JB, "Improved Genome Editing Efficiency and Flexibility Using Modified Oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases", Cell Rep, 14, pp.2263~2272 (2016)
  40. Paquet D, "Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR", Cas9, 2016, pp.533, 125~129
  41. Quadros RM, "Easi-CRISPR : a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins", Genome Biol, 18, pp.92~ (2017)
  42. Gu B, "Efficient generation of targeted large insertions by microinjection into two-cellstage mouse embryos", Nat Biotechnol, 36, pp.632~637 (2018)
  43. Aird EJ, "Increasing Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair efficiency through covalent tethering of DNA repair template", Commun Biol, 1, pp.54~ (2018)
  44. Nakade S, "Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR", Cas9, 2014, pp.5, 5560~
  45. Sakuma T, "MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems", Nat Protoc, 11, pp.118~133 (2016)
  46. Yao X, "CRISPR", Cas9-Mediated Precise Targeted Integration In Vivo Using a Double Cut Donor with Short Homology Arms, 2017, pp.20, 19~26
  47. Yao X, "Homology-mediated end joining-based targeted integration using CRISPR", Cas9, 2017, pp.27, 801~814
  48. Yao X, "Tild-CRISPR Allows for Efficient and Precise Gene Knockin in Mouse and Human Cells", Dev Cell, 45, pp.526~536 (2018)[DOI]
  49. Shrivastav M, "Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice", Cell Res, 18, pp.134~147 (2008)
  50. Allen C, "Interactive competition between homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining", Mol Cancer Res, 1, pp.913~920 (2003)
  51. Hartlerode AJ, "Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells", Biochem J, 423, pp.157~168 (2009)
  52. Ceccaldi R, "Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break", Trends Cell Biol, 26, pp.52~64 (2016)
  53. Pannunzio NR, "Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks", J Biol Chem, 293, pp.10512~10523 (2018)
  54. Shibata A, "Regulation of repair pathway choice at two-ended DNA double-strand breaks", Mutat Res, 803-805, pp.51~55 (2017)
  55. Chu VT, "Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells", Nat Biotechnol, 33, pp.543~548 (2015)
  56. Maruyama T, "Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining", Nat Biotechnol, 33, pp.538~542 (2015)
  57. Yu C, "Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells", Cell Stem Cell, 16, pp.142~147 (2015)
  58. Riesenberg S, "Targeting repair pathways with small molecules increases precise genome editing in pluripotent stem cells", Nat Commun, 9, pp.2164~ (2018)
  59. Orthwein A, "Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions", Science, 344, pp.189~193 (2014)
  60. Heyer WD, "Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes", Annu Rev Genet, 44, pp.113~139 (2010)
  61. Lin S, "Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR", Cas9 delivery, 2014, pp.3, e04766~
  62. Li G, "Small molecules enhance CRISPR", Cas9-mediated homology-directed genome editing in primary cells, 2017, pp.7, 8943~
  63. Yang D, "Enrichment of G2", M cell cycle phase in human pluripotent stem cells enhances HDR-mediated gene repair with customizable endonucleases, 2016, pp.6, 21264~
  64. Canny MD, "Inhibition of 53BP1 favors homology-dependent DNA repair and increases CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency", Nat Biotechnol, 36, pp.95~102 (2018)
  65. Song J, "RS-1 enhances CRISPR", Cas9-and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency, 2016, pp.7, 10548~
  66. Lee HK, "Targeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos", Nat Commun, 9, pp.4804~ (2018)
  67. Liu Z, "Efficient generation of mouse models of human diseases via ABE-and BE-mediated base editing", Nat Commun, 9, pp.2338~ (2018)
  68. Kim YB, "Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions", Nat Biotechnol, 35, pp.371~376 (2017)
  69. Banno S, "Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli", Nat Microbiol, 3, pp.423~429 (2018)
  70. Hu JH, "Evolved Cas9variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity", Nature, 556, pp.57~63 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Development of CRISPR technology for precise single-base genome editing: a brief review이승환, Hyomin K. Lee, Junho K. Hur, Juyoung Hong, Yeounsun Oh생화학분자생물학회 · BMB Reports2021 · 제54권 제2호Development of CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted DNA modifications and recent improvements in modification efficiency and specificity신주현, 오재욱생화학분자생물학회 · BMB Reports2020 · 제53권 제7호The road less traveled: strategies to enhance the frequency of homology-directed repair (HDR) for increased efficiency of CRISPR/Cas-mediated transgenesisSushil Devkota생화학분자생물학회 · BMB Reports2018 · 제51권 제9호Recent advances in genome engineering by CRISPR technology이승환, Yeounsun Oh, Youngsik Lee생화학분자생물학회 · BMB Reports2024 · 제57권 제1호Recent advances in developing molecular tools for targeted genome engineering of mammalian cells임광일생화학분자생물학회 · BMB Reports2015 · 제48권 제1호Applications of multiplexed CRISPR–Cas for genome engineeringCheng Himchan, Cho Seung Woo, Jeong Euihwan생화학분자생물학회 · Experimental and Molecular Medicine2025 · 제57권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Stem cells and reproduction강은주, 이연미pp. 482-489Mycoplasma exploits mammalian tunneling nanotubes for cell-to-cell dissemination김봉우, 고영규, 이재선pp. 490-495A chemical conjugate between HER2-targeting antibody fragment and Pseudomonas exotoxin A fragment demonstrates cytotoxic effects on HER2-expressing breast cancer cells이선주, Minh Tan Nguyen, 이은영, 박상수, 최한석, 김주리, 김정재, 장연진, 백상기pp. 496-501JNK activation induced by ribotoxic stress is initiated from 80S monosomes but not polysomes김준, 정유진, 김해동, 김용중, 박용준, 김태성, 공은빈, 양희웅pp. 502-507An alpha-lipoic acid-decursinol hybrid compound attenuates lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation in BV2 and RAW264.7 cells이주원, 박지원, 김상민, 박정호, 조형진, 한인옥, 권미윤pp. 508-513
원문 보기