Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse: a single center retrospective study
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (VH APR) for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A total of 610 patients with POP who underwent VH APR from January 2010 to June 2019 at Asan Medical Center were included in this study. We analyzed the patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. In addition, we compared the POP quantification system (POP-Q) pre- and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year, and analyzed the risk factors for recurrence. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.5±7.6 years. The most common preoperative POP-Q stage was stage 2 (60.8%), followed by stage 3 (35.9%). Complications were identified during surgery in 1.6% of the patients. The most common postoperative complication (6.4%) was voiding difficulty. All POP-Q scores significantly decreased at 1 year after surgery (P<0.0001). The recurrence rate was 9.6%, and most recurrences (77.5%) occurred in the anterior compartment. An advanced stage of preoperative POP was a risk factor for recurrence (stage 3 or 4 vs. stage 1 or 2; odds ratio [OR], 5.337, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.58-11.036, P<0.0001). Only two patients underwent surgical correction for POP recurrence, and most of the remaining patients did not undergo further treatment for prolapse. Conclusion: VH APR is a safe and effective surgical procedure for POP, with a low recurrence rate. In addition, advanced preoperative stage was the only risk factor for recurrent POP.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (VH APR) for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A total of 610 patients with POP who underwent VH APR from January 2010 to June 2019 at Asan Medical Center were included in this study. We analyzed the patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. In addition, we compared the POP quantification system (POP-Q) pre- and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year, and analyzed the risk factors for recurrence. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.5±7.6 years. The most common preoperative POP-Q stage was stage 2 (60.8%), followed by stage 3 (35.9%). Complications were identified during surgery in 1.6% of the patients. The most common postoperative complication (6.4%) was voiding difficulty. All POP-Q scores significantly decreased at 1 year after surgery (P<0.0001). The recurrence rate was 9.6%, and most recurrences (77.5%) occurred in the anterior compartment. An advanced stage of preoperative POP was a risk factor for recurrence (stage 3 or 4 vs. stage 1 or 2; odds ratio [OR], 5.337, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.58-11.036, P<0.0001). Only two patients underwent surgical correction for POP recurrence, and most of the remaining patients did not undergo further treatment for prolapse. Conclusion: VH APR is a safe and effective surgical procedure for POP, with a low recurrence rate. In addition, advanced preoperative stage was the only risk factor for recurrent POP.
참고문헌 (30)
- Jelovsek JE, "Pelvic organ prolapse", Lancet, 369, pp.1027~1038 (2007)
- Hendrix SL, "Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative : gravity and gravidity", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, pp.1160~1166 (2002)
- Nygaard I, "Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women", JAMA, 300, pp.1311~1316 (2008)
- Rortveit G, "Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse : prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort", Obstet Gyneco, 109, pp.1396~1403 (2007)
- Tegerstedt G, "Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 16, pp.497~503 (2005)
- 김선행, "골반 장기탈의 진단 및 치료", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 49(3), pp.501~512 (2006), 대한산부인과학회
- Yuk JS, "The prevalence and treatment pattern of clinically diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse : a Korean National Health Insurance Database-based cross-sectional study 2009-2015", Sci Rep, 8, pp.1334~ (2018)
- Dietz HP, "Prolapse worsens with age, doesn’t it?", Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 48, pp.587~591 (2008)
- Inal ZO, "Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey", Ir J Med Sci, 187, pp.485~491 (2018)
- Roovers JP, "Abdominal versus vaginal approach for the management of genital prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 13, pp.224~231 (2002)
- Johnson N, "Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (1), pp.CD003677~ (2005)
- 전명재, "Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 62(5), pp.307~312 (2019), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Dallas K, "Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100, 000 women", Obstet Gynecol, 132, pp.1328~1336 (2018)
- Glazener CM, "Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery : two parallelgroup, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials(PROSPECT)", Lancet, 389, pp.381~392 (2017)
- Dos Reis Brandão da Silveira S, "Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.335~342 (2015)
- 고광진, "Current surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Strategies for the improvement of surgical outcomes", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 60(6), pp.413~424 (2019), 대한비뇨의학회[DOI]
- Mowat A, "Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, pp.CD012975~ (2018)
- Roovers JP, "A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery : effects on urogenital function", BJOG, 111, pp.50~56 (2004)
- Persu C, "Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system(POP-Q)-a new era in pelvic prolapse staging", J Med Life, 4, pp.75~81 (2011)
- Ismail S, "Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse : International Urogynecological Association research and development committee opinion", Int Urogynecol J, 27, pp.1619~1632 (2016)
- Maher C, "Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, pp.CD004014~ (2016)
- Maher C, "Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, pp.CD012376~ (2016)
- Nager CW, "Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse : a randomized clinical trial", JAMA, 322, pp.1054~1065 (2019)
- O’Leary BD, "Blood transfusion after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse", Ir J Med Sci, 188, pp.265~266 (2019)
- Otton GR, "Transfusion rate associated with hysterectomy for benign disease", Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 41, pp.439~442 (2001)
- Nelson NC, "Estimated blood loss during vaginal hysterectomy and adnexal surgery described with an intraoperative pictographic tool", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 24, pp.347~351 (2018)
- Clarke-Pearson DL, "Complications of hysterectomy", Obstet Gynecol, 121, pp.654~673 (2013)
- 정철, "Risk factors for urinary retention after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 59(2), pp.137~143 (2016), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Mathevet P, "Operative injuries during vaginal hysterectomy", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 97, pp.71~75 (2001)
- Vergeldt TF, "Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence : a systematic review", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.1559~1573 (2015)