본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Current techniques used to perform surgery for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse in South Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in South Korea. Methods: A web-based questionnaire survey was sent to 780 members of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The items assessed in the questionnaire were the demographic characteristics and current surgical techniques used for the correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Results: The response rate was 16%. There were variations in the suture materials and methods used for anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. Most respondents used only rapid absorbable suture materials to plicate the fibromuscular layer and close the mucosal layer of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall. Simple interrupted sutures are the most popular suture method for both the fibromuscular and mucosal layers. Thirty-one and eleven percent of the respondents used mesh for surgical correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, respectively. Concomitant perineorrhaphy was routinely performed with posterior vaginal wall repair by 42% of the respondents, whereas 58% performed perineorrhaphy only in cases with perineal defects. Conclusion: There is considerable diversity in the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in Korea. Further research is required to standardize the surgical techniques.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in South Korea. Methods: A web-based questionnaire survey was sent to 780 members of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The items assessed in the questionnaire were the demographic characteristics and current surgical techniques used for the correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Results: The response rate was 16%. There were variations in the suture materials and methods used for anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. Most respondents used only rapid absorbable suture materials to plicate the fibromuscular layer and close the mucosal layer of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall. Simple interrupted sutures are the most popular suture method for both the fibromuscular and mucosal layers. Thirty-one and eleven percent of the respondents used mesh for surgical correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, respectively. Concomitant perineorrhaphy was routinely performed with posterior vaginal wall repair by 42% of the respondents, whereas 58% performed perineorrhaphy only in cases with perineal defects. Conclusion: There is considerable diversity in the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in Korea. Further research is required to standardize the surgical techniques.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Olsen AL, "Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence", Obstet Gynecol, 89, pp.501~506 (1997)
  2. Weber AM, "Anterior colporrhaphy : a randomized trial of three surgical techniques", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 185, pp.1299~1304 (2001)
  3. Maher C, "Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), pp.CD004014~ (2013)
  4. Jha S, "The UK national prolapse survey : 5 years on", Int Urogynecol J, 22, pp.517~528 (2011)
  5. Maher C, "Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, pp.CD012079~ (2016)
  6. Tawfeek S, "How are anterior repairs carried out in the UK?", J Obstet Gynaecol, 26, pp.650~655 (2006)
  7. Shippey S, "Contemporary approaches to cystocele repair : a survey of AUGS members", J Reprod Med, 53, pp.832~836 (2008)
  8. Lensen EJ, "Technique of anterior colporrhaphy : a Dutch evaluation", Int Urogynecol J, 22, pp.557~561 (2011)
  9. Lensen EJ, "The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery : a survey of Dutch urogynaecologists", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 162, pp.113~115 (2012)
  10. Kim SR, "Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists", BMC Womens Health, 21, pp.207~ (2021)
  11. Hendrix SL, "Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative : gravity and gravidity", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, pp.1160~1166 (2002)
  12. Weber AM, "Anterior colporrhaphy : a randomized trial of three surgical techniques", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 185, pp.1299~1304 (2001)
  13. Halpern-Elenskaia K, "Anterior colporrhaphy: a standard operation? Systematic review of the technical aspects of a common procedure in randomized controlled trials", Int Urogynecol J, 29, pp.781~788 (2018)
  14. Greenberg JA, "Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery", Rev Obstet Gynecol, 2, pp.146~158 (2009)
  15. Bergman I, "Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy?", Int Urogynecol J, 27, pp.1357~1365 (2016)
  16. Madhuvrata P, "A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of polyglactin(Vicryl)mesh, polydioxanone(PDS)or polyglactin(Vicryl)sutures for pelvic organ prolapse surgery : outcomes at 2 years", J Obstet Gynaecol, 31, pp.429~435 (2011)
  17. Valtersson E, "Evaluation of suture material used in anterior colporrhaphy and the risk of recurrence", Int Urogynecol J, 31, pp.2011~2018 (2020)
  18. Bergman I, "Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy?", Int Urogynecol J, 27, pp.1357~1365 (2016)
  19. Mizon G, "The effect of suture characteristics on short-term morbidity after vaginal prolapse surgery", J Obstet Gynaecol, 35, pp.625~627 (2015)
  20. Zebede S, "Reattachment of the endopelvic fascia to the apex during anterior colporrhaphy : does the type of suture matter?", Int Urogynecol J, 24, pp.141~145 (2013)
  21. Luck AM, "Suture erosion and wound dehiscence with permanent versus absorbable suture in reconstructive posterior vaginal surgery", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, pp.1626~1629 (2005)
  22. "Reclassification of urogynecologic surgical mesh instrumentation" (2016)[URL]
  23. "Urogynecologic surgical mesh implants" (2021)[URL]
  24. DeLancey JO, "Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166(6 Pt 1), pp.1717~1724 (1992)
  25. 김보혜, "Correlation between obesity and pelvic organ prolapse in Korean women", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 63(6), pp.719~725 (2020), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
  26. Rock JA, "Te Linde’s operative gynecology" (2011), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

관련 논문AI추천

Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse: a single center retrospective study이사라, Hee Dong Chae, Ju Hee Kim, So Young Lee, Sung Hoon Kim, Yoon Kyung Shin대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2022 · 제65권 제1호골반재건술 시 mesh 및 이식편 (graft)의 역할주웅대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2008 · 제51권 제1호Efficacy and Safety of Tension-free Placement of Gynemesh PS for the Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prola김태헌, 서주태, 이규성, 이영숙, 이정구, 이정주, 임수현, 정병수, 주명수, 한덕현대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2010 · 제14권 제1호Initial Experience of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Apical Prolapse in South KoreaEun Hee Yu, Ha Eun Jung, Hye Kyung Noh, Jong Kil Joo대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2020 · 제26권 제3호Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-upCássio Luís Zanettini Riccetto, Juan José Luis Sardi, Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro, Marta Alicia Ledesma, Paulo César Rodrigues Palma, Sebastián Altuna대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2018 · 제22권 제3호Partially Absorbable Mesh (SERATOM® PA) for Vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery is a Safe and Effective Option: A Multi-Center and Prospective StudyHee Dong Chae, Jung Ho Shin, Sa Ra Lee대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2025 · 제31권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)