Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a surgical polypropylene mesh for correction of anterior vaginal prolapse, with or without apical defects, by providing simultaneous reinforcement at the anterior and apical aspects of the vagina with a single- incision approach. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study involving women with baseline stage ≥2 anterior and/or apical vaginal wall prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary endpoint was defined as achievement of POP-Q stage ≤1 status. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS). The device under evaluation was Calistar A, which is fixed posteriorly to the sacrospinous ligaments with a novel tissue-anchoring system (TAS) and anteriorly to the obturator internus muscles. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: Ninety-seven women were treated and assessed for the primary outcome. They were followed for up to 2 years (n=43), with a median of 12 months. Objective cure was achieved in 86 of the 97 patients (88.7%) (P<0.0005). The mean reduction in the ICIQ-VS scores was in the range of 70%–90% for every time point (P<0.05). No bleeding or surgical revision was reported. Mesh exposure occurred in 7 patients (7.2%), urinary retention in 5 (5.2%), de novo dyspareunia in 3 (3.1%), and urinary tract infections in 7 (7.2%). Conclusions: This midterm follow-up showed that apical and anterior vaginal reinforcement with a polypropylene implant fixed with a TAS provided good anatomical correction, with no major complications.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a surgical polypropylene mesh for correction of anterior vaginal prolapse, with or without apical defects, by providing simultaneous reinforcement at the anterior and apical aspects of the vagina with a single- incision approach. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study involving women with baseline stage ≥2 anterior and/or apical vaginal wall prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary endpoint was defined as achievement of POP-Q stage ≤1 status. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS). The device under evaluation was Calistar A, which is fixed posteriorly to the sacrospinous ligaments with a novel tissue-anchoring system (TAS) and anteriorly to the obturator internus muscles. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: Ninety-seven women were treated and assessed for the primary outcome. They were followed for up to 2 years (n=43), with a median of 12 months. Objective cure was achieved in 86 of the 97 patients (88.7%) (P<0.0005). The mean reduction in the ICIQ-VS scores was in the range of 70%–90% for every time point (P<0.05). No bleeding or surgical revision was reported. Mesh exposure occurred in 7 patients (7.2%), urinary retention in 5 (5.2%), de novo dyspareunia in 3 (3.1%), and urinary tract infections in 7 (7.2%). Conclusions: This midterm follow-up showed that apical and anterior vaginal reinforcement with a polypropylene implant fixed with a TAS provided good anatomical correction, with no major complications.
참고문헌 (20)
- Barber MD, "Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse", Int Urogynecol J, 24, pp.1783~1790 (2013)[DOI]
- Gyhagen M, "Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery", BJOG, 120, pp.152~160 (2013)[DOI]
- Vergeldt TF, "Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.1559~1573 (2015)[DOI]
- Weber AM, "Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 185, pp.1299~1304 (2001)[DOI]
- Maher C, "Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2 (2016)
- Safety communications - UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, "U.S. Food and Drug Administration", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, ~ (2011)
- Davila GW, "Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery", Int Urogynecol J, 23(Suppl 1), pp.S7~S14 (2012)[DOI]
- Haylen BT, "Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: more FDA concerns--positive reactions are possible", Int Urogynecol J, 23, pp.11~13 (2012)[DOI]
- Moore RD, "Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments", Int Urogynecol J, 23, pp.85~91 (2012)[DOI]
- Moore RD, "Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up", Int Urogynecol J, 21, pp.545~552 (2010)[DOI]
- Haylen BT, "An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)", International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP), 2016, pp.27, 655~684
- Tamanini JT, "The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 19, pp.1385~1391 (2008)[DOI]
- Tamanini JT, "Validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire -- Short Form (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese", Rev Saude Publica, 38, pp.438~444 (2004)[DOI]
- Summers A, "The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, pp.1438~1443 (2006)[DOI]
- Lowder JL, "The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse", Obstet Gynecol, 111, pp.152~157 (2008)[DOI]
- Caquant F, "Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 34, pp.449~456 (2008)[DOI]
- Feiner B, "Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management", Obstet Gynecol, 115(2 Pt 1), pp.325~330 (2010)[DOI]
- Margulies RU, "Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 199, pp.678~ (2008)
- Palma P, "Monoprosthesis for anterior vaginal prolapse and stress urinary ncontinence: midterm results of an international multicentre prospective study", Int rogynecol J, 22, pp.1535~1541 (2011)[DOI]
- Abed H, "Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review", Int Urogynecol J, 22, pp.789~798 (2011)[DOI]