Efficacy of Novel Ultrathin Single-Balloon Enteroscopy for Crohn’s Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The evaluation of small bowel lesions of Crohn’s disease (CD) using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is crucial because mucosal healing is associated with a good prognosis. However, BAE procedures are invasive, requiring sedation or analgesia to reduce the patient’s pain. This study evaluated the clinical usefulness of a novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) procedure for CD. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 102 CD patients who underwent trans-anal SBE between January 2012 and May 2018. Of these patients, 82 underwent enteroscopy using conventional SBE, while 20 underwent ultrathin SBE. Patients were analyzed using propensity score matching, with 20 patients per group. The median duration of the examination, terminal ileum intubation rate, median cecum intubation time, median insertion depth, adverse events, and sedated dose in each group were compared. Results: Before propensity score matching, the conventional SBE group had a larger number of surgical history patients than the ultrathin SBE group (p=0.05). After matching, the two groups did not significantly differ clinically. There were no significant differences in the mean duration of the examination, cecum intubation time, or terminal ileal intubation rate between ultrathin SBE and conventional SBE. The mean insertion depth of ultrathin SBE tended to be deeper than that of conventional SBE (p=0.09). The use of ultrathin SBE also reduced the sedative dose during needed for enteroscopy compared with conventional SBE (p=0.005). Conclusions: Novel ultrathin SBE may be less painful for CD patients than conventional SBE.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The evaluation of small bowel lesions of Crohn’s disease (CD) using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is crucial because mucosal healing is associated with a good prognosis. However, BAE procedures are invasive, requiring sedation or analgesia to reduce the patient’s pain. This study evaluated the clinical usefulness of a novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) procedure for CD. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 102 CD patients who underwent trans-anal SBE between January 2012 and May 2018. Of these patients, 82 underwent enteroscopy using conventional SBE, while 20 underwent ultrathin SBE. Patients were analyzed using propensity score matching, with 20 patients per group. The median duration of the examination, terminal ileum intubation rate, median cecum intubation time, median insertion depth, adverse events, and sedated dose in each group were compared. Results: Before propensity score matching, the conventional SBE group had a larger number of surgical history patients than the ultrathin SBE group (p=0.05). After matching, the two groups did not significantly differ clinically. There were no significant differences in the mean duration of the examination, cecum intubation time, or terminal ileal intubation rate between ultrathin SBE and conventional SBE. The mean insertion depth of ultrathin SBE tended to be deeper than that of conventional SBE (p=0.09). The use of ultrathin SBE also reduced the sedative dose during needed for enteroscopy compared with conventional SBE (p=0.005). Conclusions: Novel ultrathin SBE may be less painful for CD patients than conventional SBE.
참고문헌 (25)
- Oostenbrug LE, "Clinical outcome of Crohn’s disease according to the Vienna classification : disease location is a useful predictor of disease course", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 18, pp.255~261 (2006)
- Lescut D, "Perioperative endoscopy of the whole small bowel in Crohn’s disease", Gut, 34, pp.647~649 (1993)
- Otterson MF, "Radiographic underestimation of small bowel stricturing Crohn’s disease : a comparison with surgical findings", Surgery, 136, pp.854~860 (2004)
- Meucci G, "Prognostic significance of endoscopic remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with oral and topical mesalazine : a prospective, multicenter study", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 18, pp.1006~1010 (2012)
- Frøslie KF, "Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a Norwegian population-based cohort", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.412~422 (2007)
- Schnitzler F, "Mucosal healing predicts long-term outcome of maintenance therapy with infliximab in Crohn’s disease", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 15, pp.1295~1301 (2009)
- Baert F, "Mucosal healing predicts sustained clinical remission in patients with early-stage Crohn’s disease", Gastroenterology, 138, pp.463~468 (2010)
- Peyrin-Biroulet L, "Results from the 2nd Scientific Workshop of the ECCO. I : Impact of mucosal healing on the course of inflammatory bowel disease", J Crohns Colitis, 5, pp.477~483 (2011)
- Van Assche G, "Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 3 : special situations", J Crohns Colitis, 7, pp.1~33 (2013)
- Arulanandan A, "Systematic review : safety of balloon assisted enteroscopy in Crohn’s disease", World J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.8999~9011 (2016)
- Sato K, "A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope", Endoscopy, 44, pp.746~753 (2012)
- Horiuchi A, "Unsedated ultrathin EGD by using a 5. 2-mm-diameter videoscope : evaluation of acceptability and diagnostic accuracy", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.868~873 (2006)
- Ai ZL, "Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy", Surg Endosc, 26, pp.3565~3572 (2012)
- Takabayashi K, "Clinical utility of novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscopy : a feasibility study", Endoscopy, 51, pp.468~471 (2019)
- Ohtsuka K, "Diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases with a newly developed single balloon endoscope", Dig Endosc, 20, pp.134~137 (2008)
- May A, "Push-andpull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique : method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer", Endoscopy, 37, pp.66~70 (2005)
- Upchurch BR, "The clinical utility of single-balloon enteroscopy : a single-center experience of 172procedures", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.1218~1223 (2010)
- Pariente B, "Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lémann score", Inflamm Bowel Dis, 17, pp.1415~1422 (2011)
- Gionchetti P, "3rd European evidencebased consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s Disease 2016 : part 2 : surgical management and special situations", J Crohns Colitis, 11, pp.135~149 (2017)
- Takenaka K, "Utility of magnetic resonance enterography for small bowel endoscopic healing in patients with Crohn’s disease", Am J Gastroenterol, 113, pp.283~294 (2018)
- Kazuo Ohtsuka, "Magnetic resonance enterography for the evaluation of the deep small intestine in Crohn’s disease", Intestinal research, 14(2), pp.120~126 (2016), 대한장연구학회
- Takenaka K, "Comparison of magnetic resonance and balloon enteroscopic examination of the small intestine in patients with Crohn’s disease", Gastroenterology, 147, pp.334~342 (2014)
- Atar M, "Transnasal endoscopy : technical considerations, advantages and limitations", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 6, pp.41~48 (2014)
- Luo DJ, "A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.484~490 (2012)
- ASGE Technology Committee, "Ultrathin endoscopes", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.893~898 (2010)