Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Single- versus Double-Balloon Enteroscopy Performed by Endoscopist Experts in Single-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Single-Center Experience and Meta-Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Studies concerning the efficacy and safety of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) compared with that of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) often appear to be conflicting. However, previous studies were performed by endoscopists who were less experienced in SBE compared with DBE. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of SBE and DBE data performed by a single enteroscopist, with expertise in SBE, using a prospective balloon-assisted enteroscopy registry from 2013 to 2015. Furthermore, we performed a comprehensive literature search and metaanalysis of available studies, including the current study, to clarify the efficacy and safety of SBE versus DBE. Results: A total of 65 procedures in 44 patients with SBE and 74 procedures in 69 patients with DBE were analyzed. There were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (61.1% vs 77.3%, respectively, p=0.397), therapeutic yield (39.1% vs 31.8%, respectively, p=0.548), and complication rate (4.4% vs 2.3%, p=1.000). In the meta-analysis, which included four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies, there were no significant differences in the pooled relative risk and odds ratio for diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications of SBE compared with those of DBE. Conclusions: The performance of SBE appears to be similar to that of DBE in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Studies concerning the efficacy and safety of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) compared with that of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) often appear to be conflicting. However, previous studies were performed by endoscopists who were less experienced in SBE compared with DBE. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of SBE and DBE data performed by a single enteroscopist, with expertise in SBE, using a prospective balloon-assisted enteroscopy registry from 2013 to 2015. Furthermore, we performed a comprehensive literature search and metaanalysis of available studies, including the current study, to clarify the efficacy and safety of SBE versus DBE. Results: A total of 65 procedures in 44 patients with SBE and 74 procedures in 69 patients with DBE were analyzed. There were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (61.1% vs 77.3%, respectively, p=0.397), therapeutic yield (39.1% vs 31.8%, respectively, p=0.548), and complication rate (4.4% vs 2.3%, p=1.000). In the meta-analysis, which included four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies, there were no significant differences in the pooled relative risk and odds ratio for diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications of SBE compared with those of DBE. Conclusions: The performance of SBE appears to be similar to that of DBE in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield and complications.
참고문헌 (15)
- Hong SN, "Indications, diagnostic yield, and complication rate of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) during the first decade of its use in Korea", Dig Endosc, 28, pp.443~449 (2016)
- Yamamoto H, "Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method", Gastrointest Endosc, 53, pp.216~220 (2001)
- Kawamura T, "Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.1112~1116 (2008)
- May A, "Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.575~581 (2010)
- Domagk D, "Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial", Endoscopy, 43, pp.472~476 (2011)
- Takano N, "Single-balloon versus double-balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.734~739 (2011)
- Efthymiou M, "SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.972~980 (2012)
- Mehdizadeh S, "What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.740~750 (2006)
- ASGE Technology Committee, "Enteroscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.975~990 (2015)
- Möschler O, "German DBE Study Group. Complications in and performance of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE): results from a large prospective DBE database in Germany", Endoscopy, 43, pp.484~489 (2011)
- Lenz P, "Double- vs. single-balloon enteroscopy: single center experience with emphasis on procedural performance", Int J Colorectal Dis, 28, pp.1239~1246 (2013)
- Pinho R, "Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal", United European Gastroenterol J, 4, pp.264~274 (2016)
- Wadhwa V, "A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety: single-balloon vs. double-balloon enteroscopy", Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 3, pp.148~155 (2015)
- Lipka S, "Single versus double balloon enteroscopy for small bowel diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Clin Gastroenterol, 49, pp.177~184 (2015)
- Teshima CW, "Small bowel enteroscopy", Can J Gastroenterol, 26, pp.269~275 (2012)