고대 동아시아 궁궐의 입지와 배치전개에 관한 연구
The Study of the Location and Layout of Ancient East Asian Palaces
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Palaces are excellent architecture which has the most magnificence and size of the period. East Asian palaces of China, Japan and Korea are mostly formed within one big boundary. China has emphasized the vertical axis of the meridian and some palaces are arranged symmetric in a row on each side of the east and west according to the period of time. Ancient China during the Han dynasty built an international standardized East Asian palace in Jangan during that time. Korean palaces got influence from the Chinese emphasizing the vertical axis layout with the ‘Jeonjohuchim’ (front governing and back living space) and 3 area of the royal palace system. For Korea, as the palace was situated within parts of the mountain, the northern living space went to the west or eastern side making a 90° rotation of the axis. The changed axis made a change of the building layout of the living space according to the natural geographic features. The building plans also have differences with China. Especially with the auxiliary buildings on the sides of the main building have differences among the main palace, sub palace and living palace. The living space normally has an aisle connected with the 2 buildings making a ‘工’ shape. Japanese palaces had the vertical axis centered layout with the flow of the Chinese culture. The differences are in the relationship with the Tairi(內裏) space and Jyotou(朝堂) space. The palaces of China and Korea have developed with separate spaces for the king’s ruling and official’s governing space. As stated above, the palaces from countries of East Asia had influence from China, but developed differently according to their politics, society and culture with different construction conceptions. Palaces after the ancient period developed as excellent architecture reflecting the unique architectural culture of each country with sublimation succession.
Abstract
Palaces are excellent architecture which has the most magnificence and size of the period. East Asian palaces of China, Japan and Korea are mostly formed within one big boundary. China has emphasized the vertical axis of the meridian and some palaces are arranged symmetric in a row on each side of the east and west according to the period of time. Ancient China during the Han dynasty built an international standardized East Asian palace in Jangan during that time. Korean palaces got influence from the Chinese emphasizing the vertical axis layout with the ‘Jeonjohuchim’ (front governing and back living space) and 3 area of the royal palace system. For Korea, as the palace was situated within parts of the mountain, the northern living space went to the west or eastern side making a 90° rotation of the axis. The changed axis made a change of the building layout of the living space according to the natural geographic features. The building plans also have differences with China. Especially with the auxiliary buildings on the sides of the main building have differences among the main palace, sub palace and living palace. The living space normally has an aisle connected with the 2 buildings making a ‘工’ shape. Japanese palaces had the vertical axis centered layout with the flow of the Chinese culture. The differences are in the relationship with the Tairi(內裏) space and Jyotou(朝堂) space. The palaces of China and Korea have developed with separate spaces for the king’s ruling and official’s governing space. As stated above, the palaces from countries of East Asia had influence from China, but developed differently according to their politics, society and culture with different construction conceptions. Palaces after the ancient period developed as excellent architecture reflecting the unique architectural culture of each country with sublimation succession.
참고문헌 (20)
- 전랑지, 남고루 발굴조사보고서, "경주문화재연구소", ~ (1995)
- 부여 관북리백제유적 발굴보고Ⅲ, "국립부여문화재연구소", ~ (2009)
- 국립부여문화재연구소, "왕궁리Ⅵ" (2008)
- 김동욱, "한국건축의 역사", pp.64~ (1997), 기문당
- 김동현, "백제문화단지준공보고서 2권", pp.106~107 (2010), 충청남도․한국전통문화대학교
- 김일성종합대학, "대성산의 고구려유적" (1973), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 대한건축학회, "한국건축사", pp.104~105 (2003), 기문당
- 리원허, "중국 고전건축의 원리", pp.120~127 (2003), 시공사
- 리화선, "조선건축사Ⅰ", pp.78~79 (1993), 발언
- 안압지 발굴조사보고서, "문화재관리국", ~ (1978)
- 유돈정, "중국고대건축사", pp.99~101 (2003), 세진사
- 윤장섭, "일본의 건축", pp.76~81 (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 윤장섭, "중국건축사", pp.79~83 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 이강근, "한국의 궁궐", pp.12~14 (1991), 대원사
- 이근우, "新羅의 都城과 日本의 都城", 신라문화, (26), pp.179~207 (2005), 신라문화연구소
- 주남철, "한국건축사", pp.62~ (2010), 고려대학교 출판부
- 부여관북리 백제유적 발굴보고(1), "충남대학교박물관", ~ (1985)
- 하업거, "중국 도성제도의 이론", pp.40~43 (1995), 이회문화사
- 西 和夫, "일본건축사", pp.89~91 (1999), 세진사
- 町田 章, "古代の宮殿と寺院", pp.18~19 (1988), 講談社
