본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

高句麗 安鶴宮 中央 建築群에 대한 考察 -前殿 高臺建築 形制의 채용을 중심으로-

The Study of Center Buildings in Anhak Palace during Goguryeo Periods

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

There may be various ways to make a systematic understanding of a country. Of them, the study of a palace, a central area of the country's capital, has a great significance in that it offers a basic data enabling to clearly interpret the characteristics ofthe country. By and large, the palace is understood not only as a space in which a regime is located, but also that which is symbolic of absolute control in the ancient times of East Asia. This is also the case with Goguryeo, but it seems the relevant studies still remain relatively small in number. Furthermore, the Anhak Palace, with its excavation report already published, is exposed to the basic limitation in understanding its meaning, since there is hitherto no unified opinion about its construction period, whether the middle Goguryeo Dynasty or the middle Goguryeo Dynasty. This appears to be caused by the fact that the existing discussions have been focused on specific remains like tiles. Accordingly, we are forced to turn our attention to the interpretation of structural relics, if we are to look into the capital system of Goguryeo revolving around the Anhak Palace in another perspective. Judging from the arrangement structure of its central architecture groups, the Anhak Palace, similar to the front hall of the Mi-ang Palace in the Han Dynasty, shows the traits of the high elevation architecture style, not seen in the capitals of East Asia since Su and Tang Dynasties, like the Taegeukjeon and the Dongseodang in the Jeongjeongwak of its South Palace. The traits were also found in the Gungnaeseong Palace. Therefore, it seems unreasonable to grasp the Anhak Palace on the basis of the palace arrangement in the Su and Tang Dynasties, without any clear foundation. According to the findings of this study, the Gungnaeseong Palace adopted the high elevation architecture style that had originated from the front hall of the Mi-ang Palace in the Han Dynasty, and the Anhak Palace took over the style from the Gungnaeseong Palace and then newly received the system of Taegeukjeon and Dongseodang. In addition, it is probable that the Sanggyeongseong Palace in the Balhae Kingdom employed the styles of the Anhak Palace and the Janganseong Palace in the Tang Dynasty.

Abstract

There may be various ways to make a systematic understanding of a country. Of them, the study of a palace, a central area of the country's capital, has a great significance in that it offers a basic data enabling to clearly interpret the characteristics ofthe country. By and large, the palace is understood not only as a space in which a regime is located, but also that which is symbolic of absolute control in the ancient times of East Asia. This is also the case with Goguryeo, but it seems the relevant studies still remain relatively small in number. Furthermore, the Anhak Palace, with its excavation report already published, is exposed to the basic limitation in understanding its meaning, since there is hitherto no unified opinion about its construction period, whether the middle Goguryeo Dynasty or the middle Goguryeo Dynasty. This appears to be caused by the fact that the existing discussions have been focused on specific remains like tiles. Accordingly, we are forced to turn our attention to the interpretation of structural relics, if we are to look into the capital system of Goguryeo revolving around the Anhak Palace in another perspective. Judging from the arrangement structure of its central architecture groups, the Anhak Palace, similar to the front hall of the Mi-ang Palace in the Han Dynasty, shows the traits of the high elevation architecture style, not seen in the capitals of East Asia since Su and Tang Dynasties, like the Taegeukjeon and the Dongseodang in the Jeongjeongwak of its South Palace. The traits were also found in the Gungnaeseong Palace. Therefore, it seems unreasonable to grasp the Anhak Palace on the basis of the palace arrangement in the Su and Tang Dynasties, without any clear foundation. According to the findings of this study, the Gungnaeseong Palace adopted the high elevation architecture style that had originated from the front hall of the Mi-ang Palace in the Han Dynasty, and the Anhak Palace took over the style from the Gungnaeseong Palace and then newly received the system of Taegeukjeon and Dongseodang. In addition, it is probable that the Sanggyeongseong Palace in the Balhae Kingdom employed the styles of the Anhak Palace and the Janganseong Palace in the Tang Dynasty.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 채희국, "대성산 일대의 고구려유적에 관한 연구" (1964), 사회과학출판사
  2. 김일성종합대학출판사, "대성산의 고구려유적", ~ (1973)
  3. 전제헌, "안학궁유적에 대한 연구", 고구려력사연구 (1985)
  4. 閔德植, "高句麗의 中期都城", 韓國史論, 19 (2003)
  5. 關野貞, "高句麗の平壤城及び長安城に就いて, In 朝鮮の建築と藝術" (1941), 岩波書店
  6. 田中俊明, "高句麗の平壤遷都", 朝鮮學報, pp.2004~
  7. 谷豊信, "平壤遷都前後の高句麗瓦に關する覺書-東京國立博物館收藏資料の紹介-", MUSEUM 596, ~ (2005)
  8. 양정석, "安鶴宮 南宮 正殿廓의 構造를 통해 본 高句麗 都城制, In 고구려의 국제관계" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  9. 고구려 안학궁 조사 보고서 2006, "고구려연구재단", ~ (2006)
  10. 김봉건, "궁궐, In 北韓文化財解說集 Ⅲ" (2002), 국립문화재연구소
  11. 한인호, "조선중세건축유적연구 삼국편", pp.54~ (1995), 사회과학출판사
  12. 千田剛道, "淸岩里廢寺と安鶴宮, In 奈良國立文化財硏究所創立30周年記念 文化財論叢" (1983)
  13. 千田剛道, "高句麗·高麗の瓦, In 朝鮮の古瓦を考える" (1996), 帝塚山考古學硏究所
  14. 井上和人, "발해 상경 용천부의 도성계획에 대한 신고찰, In 동아시아의 도성과 발해(東アジアの都城と渤海)" (2008)
  15. 集安縣文物保管所, "集安高句麗國內城址的調査與試掘", 文物, 84(1) (1984)
  16. 吉林城文物考古硏究所, "國內城" (2004), 文物出版社
  17. 임기환, "고구려 도성제의 변천, In 한국의 도성", pp.4~ (2003), 서울시립대학교 부설 서울학연구소
  18. 방학봉, "고구려 도성의 변화 발전 과정으로부터 본 고구려 평지도성의 특점", 고구려연구재단 제1회 국제학술회의 논문집
  19. 菫鑒泓, "中國都城發達史", pp.42~ (1993), 學硏文化社
  20. 中國社會科學院考古硏究所, "漢 長安城 未央宮-1980~1989年考古發掘報告-" (1996), 中國大百科全書出版社
  21. 유경주, "한 장안성에 대한 발굴조사와 연구, In 중국 고대도성 조사보고서", pp.242~ (2005), 국립문화재연구소
  22. 중국 고대도성 조사보고서, "국립문화재연구소 유적조사연구실", 국립문화재연구소, ~ (2005)
  23. 楊鴻勛, "宮殿考古通論", pp.232~ (2001), 紫禁城出版社
  24. 전제헌, "동명왕릉에 관한 연구", pp.144~ (1994), 사회과학출판사
  25. "史記 「高祖本紀」 高帝九年條", ~
  26. "漢書", ~
  27. 劉敦楨, "中國古代建築史", ~ (1978)
  28. "太平御覽 卷175 居處部3 殿條", ~
  29. 劉敦禎, "東西堂史料", 中國營造學社彙刊, 5(2) (1934)
  30. 吉田歡, "隋唐長安宮城中樞部の成立過程", 古代文化, 49(1) (1997)
  31. 林部均, "飛鳥淨御原宮の成立·古代宮都變遷と傳乘飛鳥板蓋宮跡", 日本史硏究, 434, pp.12~ (1998)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)