워즈워스의 「피터 벨」에 나타난 독자의 역할과 해석의 문제
The Role of Readers and the Question of Interpretation in Wordsworth's “Peter Bell”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay attempts to explore the ways in which Wordsworth integrates his audiences in his 1819 poem, “Peter Bell: A Tale,” as part of innovating and expanding his relationship with readers. In the 1800 “Preface” to Lyrical Ballads, Wordsworth defined the poet as “a man speaking to men”; hence, his poetry presupposes the constructive relationship between poet and reader from composition through reception. Initially, he planned to publish the poem in the first edition of Lyrical Ballads in 1798 as a counterpart to Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere.” In this regard, this essay claims that “Peter Bell” is the continuation of Wordsworth’s early poetics for the following two reasons: first, readers are constitutive of the poem as the immediate auditors; second, supernatural poetry is replaced by natural and everyday poetry. “Peter Bell: A Tale” showcases the double role of audience as both interpreter and constituent of the poem. To be precise, the poem embraces a framed narrative, through which occurs the sharing of stories as a vehicle for the speaker's and his neighbors' contributing to the production and interpretation of poetry. Moreover, the current context of the tale apparently promises the repetition of a similar occasion in which the story is told and heard in a different time and space. Therefore, the relationship between the speaker and his audiences within the text extends to that of the poet and his readers mediated by the print culture. “Peter Bell” foregrounds the multiple layered structures of interpretative voices: first, Robert Southey as a reader of the prologue before publication; second, the speaker's neighbors as immediate auditors; and finally, the readers whose voices are not heard and yet implied inevitably from the moment of inception. Consequently, the text of “Peter Bell” is produced only insofar as his direct and indirect audiences co-exist. First, in his dedication to Southey, Wordsworth responds to the poet laureate's negative review of the prologue, advocating his own poetics of everyday as opposed to Southey's predilection for the supernatural and epic. Wordsworth’s critique of the supernatural entails the transformation of both the speaker and Peter Bell from supernatural to natural, callous to sympathetic hearts. Their change proves partly nature’s correction and partly their voluntary decision to stay close to the humans in their vicinity; but it is far from mystical. Second, challenged by his neighbors and yet engaging them in the narrative, the speaker bears witness to a hermeneutic community represented in the text as well as the readers outside the text. Furthermore, the speaker’s neighbors help him employ the “real language of men,” thus affirming Wordsworth’s poetics to replace a hackneyed poetic diction with the experimental poetry inspired by ordinary rustics as in Lyrical Ballads. Finally, the first-hand audiences' intervention in and redirection of the speaker's narrative is contingent upon the poet's demand for his readers' active participation in the interpretative community via the print culture. In the middle of hostile reviews, mocking satires and parodies, in particular, Francis Jeffrey’s The Edinburgh Review and Leigh Hunt’s The Examiner, Wordsworth's poem marked record-sale, thus inducing more aggressive responses from such younger poets as John Hamilton Reynolds and Percy Bysshe Shelley, who wrote Peter Bell: A Lyrical Ballad and “Peter Bell the Third” respectively. These works attest not only to the younger poets' attack upon the old poet's affinity with conservative politics but also to their own involvement in the signification of “Peter Bell” as readers.
Abstract
This essay attempts to explore the ways in which Wordsworth integrates his audiences in his 1819 poem, “Peter Bell: A Tale,” as part of innovating and expanding his relationship with readers. In the 1800 “Preface” to Lyrical Ballads, Wordsworth defined the poet as “a man speaking to men”; hence, his poetry presupposes the constructive relationship between poet and reader from composition through reception. Initially, he planned to publish the poem in the first edition of Lyrical Ballads in 1798 as a counterpart to Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere.” In this regard, this essay claims that “Peter Bell” is the continuation of Wordsworth’s early poetics for the following two reasons: first, readers are constitutive of the poem as the immediate auditors; second, supernatural poetry is replaced by natural and everyday poetry. “Peter Bell: A Tale” showcases the double role of audience as both interpreter and constituent of the poem. To be precise, the poem embraces a framed narrative, through which occurs the sharing of stories as a vehicle for the speaker's and his neighbors' contributing to the production and interpretation of poetry. Moreover, the current context of the tale apparently promises the repetition of a similar occasion in which the story is told and heard in a different time and space. Therefore, the relationship between the speaker and his audiences within the text extends to that of the poet and his readers mediated by the print culture. “Peter Bell” foregrounds the multiple layered structures of interpretative voices: first, Robert Southey as a reader of the prologue before publication; second, the speaker's neighbors as immediate auditors; and finally, the readers whose voices are not heard and yet implied inevitably from the moment of inception. Consequently, the text of “Peter Bell” is produced only insofar as his direct and indirect audiences co-exist. First, in his dedication to Southey, Wordsworth responds to the poet laureate's negative review of the prologue, advocating his own poetics of everyday as opposed to Southey's predilection for the supernatural and epic. Wordsworth’s critique of the supernatural entails the transformation of both the speaker and Peter Bell from supernatural to natural, callous to sympathetic hearts. Their change proves partly nature’s correction and partly their voluntary decision to stay close to the humans in their vicinity; but it is far from mystical. Second, challenged by his neighbors and yet engaging them in the narrative, the speaker bears witness to a hermeneutic community represented in the text as well as the readers outside the text. Furthermore, the speaker’s neighbors help him employ the “real language of men,” thus affirming Wordsworth’s poetics to replace a hackneyed poetic diction with the experimental poetry inspired by ordinary rustics as in Lyrical Ballads. Finally, the first-hand audiences' intervention in and redirection of the speaker's narrative is contingent upon the poet's demand for his readers' active participation in the interpretative community via the print culture. In the middle of hostile reviews, mocking satires and parodies, in particular, Francis Jeffrey’s The Edinburgh Review and Leigh Hunt’s The Examiner, Wordsworth's poem marked record-sale, thus inducing more aggressive responses from such younger poets as John Hamilton Reynolds and Percy Bysshe Shelley, who wrote Peter Bell: A Lyrical Ballad and “Peter Bell the Third” respectively. These works attest not only to the younger poets' attack upon the old poet's affinity with conservative politics but also to their own involvement in the signification of “Peter Bell” as readers.
참고문헌 (33)
- Averill, James H., "Suffering and Calm in Wordsworth’s Early Poetry", PMLA, 91(2), pp.223~234 (1976)
- Bates, Brian, "J. H. Reynolds Re-Echoes the Wordsworthian Reputation: ‘Peter Bell,’ Making the Work and Mocking the Man", Studies in Romanticism, 47(3), pp.273~297 (2008)
- Bewell, Alan J., "The ‘Wonders of a Wild Career’: Peter Bell and the Natural History of Religion, In Wordsworth and the Enlightenment: Nature, Man, and Society in the Experimental Poetry", pp.109~141 (1989), Yale UP
- Butler, Marilyn, "Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background 1760-1830" (1982), Oxford UP
- Eilenberg, Susan R., "Mortal Pages: Wordsworth and the Reform of Copyright, In Strange Power of Speech: Wordsworth, Coleridge and Literary Possession", pp.192~212 (1992), Oxford UP
- Erickson, Lee, "The Egoism of Authorship: Wordsworth’s Poetic Career, In The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing, 1800-1850", pp.49~69 (2000), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Ferguson, Frances, "Writing and Orality around 1800: ‘Speakers,’ ‘Readers,’ and Wordsworth’s ‘The Thorn’, In Wordsworth's Poetic Theory: Knowledge, Language, Experience", pp.119~138 (2010), Palgrave
- Fulford, Tim, "Wordsworth: The Politics of Landscape, In Landscape, Liberty, and Authority: Poetry, Criticism, and Politics from Thomson to Wordsworth", pp.157~213 (1996), Cambridge UP
- Hess, Scott, "My Office Upon Earth’: William Wordsworth, Professionalism, and Poetic Identity, In Authoring the Self: Self-Representation, Authorship, and the Print Market in British Poetry from Pope through Wordsworth", pp.197~233 (2005), Routledge
- Jacobus, Mary, "Peter Bell the First", Essays in Criticism, 24(3), pp.219~242 (1974)
- Jacobus, Mary, "Tradition and Experiment in Wordsworth’s Lyrical Ballads(1798)" (1976), Clarendon Press
- Jordan, John E., "Introduction, In Peter Bell. William Wordsworth", pp.3~28 (1985), Cornell UP
- Kenyon-Jones, Christine, "Animals and Nature: Beasts, Birds and Wordsworth’s Ecological Credentials, In Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing", pp.141~164 (2001), Ashgate
- Klancher, Jon P., "The Making of English Reading Audiences, 1790-1832" (1987), U of Wisconsin P
- Marsh, George L., "The ‘Peter Bell’ Parodies of 1819", Modern Philology, 40(3), pp.167~274 (1819)
- Newlyn, Lucy, "Reading, Writing, and Romanticism: The Anxieties of Reception" (2000), Oxford UP
- Owen, W. J. B., "Wordsworth’s Literary Criticism" (1974), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Perkins, David, "Romanticism and Animal Rights" (2003), Cambridge UP
- Rajan, Tilottama, "The Supplement of Reading : Figures of Understanding in Romantic Theory and Practice" (1990), Cornell UP
- Reynolds, John Hamilton, "Peter Bell: A Lyrical Ballad" (1819), Taylor and Hessey
- Shaffer, Elinor S., "The Hermeneutic Community: Coleridge and Schleiermacher, In The Coleridge Connection: Essays for Thomas McFarland", pp.186~211 (1990), Macmillan
- Sheats, Paul D., "The Making of Wordsworth’s Poetry, 1785-1798" (1973), Harvard UP
- Shelley, Percy Bysshe, "Shelley’s Poetry and Prose" (1977), Norton
- St Clair, William, "The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period" (2004), Cambridge UP
- Swann, Karen, "Suffering and Sensation in The Ruined Cottage", PMLA, 106(1), pp.83~95 (1991)
- Trott, Nicola, "Wordsworth and the Parodic School of Criticism, In The Satiric Eye: Forms of Satire in the Romantic Period", pp.71~97 (2003), Palgrave
- Turner, John, "Peter Bell: A Tale, In Wordsworth: Play and Politics. A Study of Wordsworth’s Poetry, 1787-1800", pp.140~152 (1986), Macmillan
- Woof, R. S., "Wordsworth's Poetry and Stuart's Newspapers: 1797-1803", Studies in Bibliography, 15(1962), pp.149~189 (1962)
- Wordsworth, William, "Essay, Supplementary to the Preface", pp.192~218, Owen
- Wordsworth, William, "Peter Bell" (1985), Cornell UP
- Wordsworth, William, "Preface and Appendix to Lyrical Ballads", pp.68~102 (1802), Owen
- Wordsworth, William, "The Poems. 2 vols" (1977), Yale UP
- Wordsworth, William, "Lyrical Ballads" (1991), Routledge