본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「かったです」 습득에서의 입력처리교수 방법의 효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Effects of the Processing Instruction on the Acquisition of Kattadesu

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

In this article, we address the issue of what teaching method is effective for accelerating the acquisition of kattadesu, a polite past-tense form of the i-adjectives in Japanese. To this end, we explore whether the teaching method based on Processing Instruction, proposed by the SLA researcher, VanPatten is more effective than the standard production-centered method. We provided the Processing-Instruction teaching and the production-centered teaching for the kattadesu-expressions in introductory classes on Japanese at a university in order to see whether the two teaching methods help the learners to improve their exam scores in terms of both comprehension and production and also which method is more effective. 64 university students were involved in this experiment, and the result indicates that as a whole, the Processing-Instruction teaching outperforms the output-centred teaching. It is thus suggested that the Processing-Instruction teaching method is effective for reducing the cases where desita is mistakenly used in place of kattadesu, the use of kattadesu is over-generalised, or the expression is wrongly used.

Abstract

In this article, we address the issue of what teaching method is effective for accelerating the acquisition of kattadesu, a polite past-tense form of the i-adjectives in Japanese. To this end, we explore whether the teaching method based on Processing Instruction, proposed by the SLA researcher, VanPatten is more effective than the standard production-centered method. We provided the Processing-Instruction teaching and the production-centered teaching for the kattadesu-expressions in introductory classes on Japanese at a university in order to see whether the two teaching methods help the learners to improve their exam scores in terms of both comprehension and production and also which method is more effective. 64 university students were involved in this experiment, and the result indicates that as a whole, the Processing-Instruction teaching outperforms the output-centred teaching. It is thus suggested that the Processing-Instruction teaching method is effective for reducing the cases where desita is mistakenly used in place of kattadesu, the use of kattadesu is over-generalised, or the expression is wrongly used.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 中上亜紀, "処理指導の効果に関する研究:-日本語の形容詞比較の指導を通して", The Journal of Educational Research, 6(0), pp.41~50 (2010), The ChugokuShikoku Society for the Study of Education
  2. 中上亜紀, "理解中心の指導法「処理指導」と産出中心の指導との比較研究-形容詞の比較の指導を通して-", 日本語教育, 151, pp.48~62 (2012), 日本語教育学会
  3. Allen, L.Q., "Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.69~84 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  4. Cadierno, T., "Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense", The Modern Language Journal, 79, pp.179~193 (1995), Wiley- Blackwell
  5. DeKeyser, R., "The differential role of comprehension and production practice", Language Learning, 51, pp.81~112 (2001), Language Learning Research Club
  6. Lee, J., "Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and in virtual contexts: Research and practice", pp.49~71 (2007), Equinox
  7. Marsden, E., "Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input", Language Learning, 56, pp.507~566 (2006), Language Learning Research Club
  8. Morgan-Short, K., "Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effect on second language development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.31~65 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  9. Salaberry, M., "The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, pp.422~451 (1997), University of Toronto Press
  10. Toth, P., "Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition", Language Learning, 56, pp.319~385 (2006), Language Learning Research Club
  11. VanPatten, B., "Explicit instruction and input processing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.225~243 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  12. VanPatten, B., "Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction", The Modern Language Journal, 77, pp.45~57 (1993), Wiley-Blackwell
  13. VanPatten, B., "Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary", pp.97~118 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)