한국어와 일본어의 통사적 애매성의 해소와 운율적 특징
Prosodic Elements and their Resolution of Syntactic Ambiguities in Korean and Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean and Japanese are syntactically similar to one another, and there are syntactic structures that become ambiguous. The prosody can play a crucial role in differentiating ambiguous sentences to correctly reflect their intended syntactic structures. In what way do the speakers of Japanese and Korean use prosodic elements to differentiate syntactic ambiguities? Acoustic measurement was made of utterances of ambiguous sentences in Japanese to observe prosodic strategies for disambiguation. Materials were sentences of the type ADV- VP1-NP-VP2 and NP1-NP2-NP3-VP. For this construction the Japanese create the same ambiguities. After defining the depth of a syntactic boundary, F0 of the phrase before and after the boundary, and duration of the syllable and pause before the boundary were measured. The results show that Japanese speakers use F0 after syntactic boundary, and Korean speakers use F0 after syntactic boundary, lengthening of the syllable and/or pause before the boundary.
Abstract
Korean and Japanese are syntactically similar to one another, and there are syntactic structures that become ambiguous. The prosody can play a crucial role in differentiating ambiguous sentences to correctly reflect their intended syntactic structures. In what way do the speakers of Japanese and Korean use prosodic elements to differentiate syntactic ambiguities? Acoustic measurement was made of utterances of ambiguous sentences in Japanese to observe prosodic strategies for disambiguation. Materials were sentences of the type ADV- VP1-NP-VP2 and NP1-NP2-NP3-VP. For this construction the Japanese create the same ambiguities. After defining the depth of a syntactic boundary, F0 of the phrase before and after the boundary, and duration of the syllable and pause before the boundary were measured. The results show that Japanese speakers use F0 after syntactic boundary, and Korean speakers use F0 after syntactic boundary, lengthening of the syllable and/or pause before the boundary.
참고문헌 (5)
- 민광준, "한일 양 언어의 통어구조와 운율적 특징에 관한 음향음성학적 연 구", 일어일문학연구, (24), pp.21~45 (1994), 한국일어일문학회
- 최영숙, "일본 센다이 방언과 터키 앙카라 방언의 운열에 나타나는 통사적 애매성 해소에 관한 연구", 음성과학, 10(3), pp.175~186 (2003), 한국음성과학회
- 東淳一, "統語的あいまい文の理解においてF0とポーズが果す役割 - 近畿方言 を素材として", 音声学会会報, (191), pp.1~5 (1989), 日本音声学会
- 東淳一, "日本語の統語境界におけるF0とモーラ長のふるまいについて, In 文法と 音声", pp.21~44 (1997), くろしお出版
- 藤崎博也, "統語構造を利用した韻律記号導出 アルゴリズム", 昭和61年春季日本音響學會講演論文集, 2(2), pp.167~168 (1986), 日本音響学会
