본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대 사진예술의 쟁점들

Issues in Contemporary Photography Art

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사진

초록

It is the age of post-photography, referring to the era of electronic photography. Digital photographs can be modified and manipulated any time so they might be false images. A digital photograph can be an index but may morph into an icon. Photographs can be the products of either a virtual world or a fictional imagination. Any post-photographic expression brought about a revolutionary change in artistic photography. The assertion that a photograph is a mark of light is no longer objective. Photographs in the era of post-photography feature a composition of time, a mixture of the past and present, a representation of past memories, a coexistence of two and three dimensions, a coexistence of fragmented history, and the mode of pastiches. A photograph here is nothing but a material for representation. And yet, photography’s realistic ontology is still effective and much more photographs tend to reinforce photography’s realistic aspects. As a result, photography as art comes to have much more diverse forms. We are living in an age of the post-Internet after post-photography. Photography has already been part of art. Artists employ or utilize re- intermediated mediums in accepting information in this post-Internet era. In this era imaging technology has merged with contemporary art. A contemporary metaphor maintains its meaning in a relation incessantly altering like rhizomes. The concept of readymade has still been appropriated, profoundly influenced by the motive and dynamism of the post-Internet environment. The post-Internet is an extensive account of the artistic convention that takes something networked and integrated for granted. As we are living in the era of nonlinear technical images, the material property of marks engendered by photography’s contact with light have disappeared in the digital environment of contemporary art and photography. The everyday in which the virtual is mixed with the real through any in-intermediation and solidarity with time, place, space, and medium. As a real space is connected to a virtual space by the advancement of Internet technology and social networking sites, art materials have turned into something immaterial and any representations force us to perceive a virtual space as a new reality. The medium of photography is given a new status as media art in the deconstruction of genre in the the post-Internet era. Two-dimensional photography is asked to have a three-dimensional perception of space with the progress of technical videos, forging a united front with sculpture and video as an arrangement of time. As photography has become the medium to incarnate all aspects of post-modernism, we realize we have to become the subject to perceive the world, not merely choose time. Both language and expression are altered as the medium changes. We witness the medium of photography enriching art history across the world. The problem of whether photography is art or not is no longer a matter of discussion. It is nothing but a medium. What should be asked again is what we should do with this medium.

Abstract

It is the age of post-photography, referring to the era of electronic photography. Digital photographs can be modified and manipulated any time so they might be false images. A digital photograph can be an index but may morph into an icon. Photographs can be the products of either a virtual world or a fictional imagination. Any post-photographic expression brought about a revolutionary change in artistic photography. The assertion that a photograph is a mark of light is no longer objective. Photographs in the era of post-photography feature a composition of time, a mixture of the past and present, a representation of past memories, a coexistence of two and three dimensions, a coexistence of fragmented history, and the mode of pastiches. A photograph here is nothing but a material for representation. And yet, photography’s realistic ontology is still effective and much more photographs tend to reinforce photography’s realistic aspects. As a result, photography as art comes to have much more diverse forms. We are living in an age of the post-Internet after post-photography. Photography has already been part of art. Artists employ or utilize re- intermediated mediums in accepting information in this post-Internet era. In this era imaging technology has merged with contemporary art. A contemporary metaphor maintains its meaning in a relation incessantly altering like rhizomes. The concept of readymade has still been appropriated, profoundly influenced by the motive and dynamism of the post-Internet environment. The post-Internet is an extensive account of the artistic convention that takes something networked and integrated for granted. As we are living in the era of nonlinear technical images, the material property of marks engendered by photography’s contact with light have disappeared in the digital environment of contemporary art and photography. The everyday in which the virtual is mixed with the real through any in-intermediation and solidarity with time, place, space, and medium. As a real space is connected to a virtual space by the advancement of Internet technology and social networking sites, art materials have turned into something immaterial and any representations force us to perceive a virtual space as a new reality. The medium of photography is given a new status as media art in the deconstruction of genre in the the post-Internet era. Two-dimensional photography is asked to have a three-dimensional perception of space with the progress of technical videos, forging a united front with sculpture and video as an arrangement of time. As photography has become the medium to incarnate all aspects of post-modernism, we realize we have to become the subject to perceive the world, not merely choose time. Both language and expression are altered as the medium changes. We witness the medium of photography enriching art history across the world. The problem of whether photography is art or not is no longer a matter of discussion. It is nothing but a medium. What should be asked again is what we should do with this medium.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 김영룡, "디지털 사진의 지표성과 매개된 공간의 진리 연관성- 구르스키의 구성주의 사진과 벤야민의 미디어 이론", 독어독문학, 59(3), pp.121~144 (2018), 한국독어독문학회[DOI]
  2. 백승균, "사진 철학을 만나다" (2014), 북길드
  3. 문성호, "사진 꼴라쥬, 꿈의 편린으로 짜깁은 따뜻한 퀄트 이불, 원성원 전시 평", ~ (2010)
  4. 이용환, "대구 현대사진의 태동과 사진 교육시스템에 대한 연구", pp.2019
  5. 프레드 리친, "컴퓨터시대의 포토저널리즘, 사진과 텍스트" (2006)
  6. 빌렘 프루서, "사진의 철학을 위하여" (1999), 커뮤케이션북스
  7. Robert Shore, "Post-Photography: The Artist with a Camera" (2011), Elephant Book
  8. Charlotte Cotton, "Photography Is Magic" (2017), Aperture
  9. Charlotte Cotton, "Photography Is Magic", 대구사진비엔날레, ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)