아동의 미술 정의에 내재된 담론분석: 미술교육 방향의 재고
Discourse Analysis on Children's Definition of Art : Rethinking of the Direction of Art Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate what socio-cultural value and belief about visual arts are learned and internalized by Korean children. For a long time, children's art-making has been considered as a product of individuals. Therefore, children's art has been understood based on universal developmental information. However, new scholars who are interested in socio-cultural aspects of children's artistic development starts raising questions on this developmental perspective. For example, Pearson (2001) claimed that children's art practice is a social practice. It means that we need to understand children's art practice with in a specific context in which children are engaged in. Through participating in repeated everyday art practices, children can learn social value and belief on art and they produce their art as expected by their society automatically. Therefore, it is important what social value and belief on art Korean children learned and internalized in order to think about the direction of future art education in Korea. For this study, 418 elementary school students were interviewed with a question, "What do you think art is?" There answers are transcribed after interviews and analyzed using the method of discourse analysis which is known as a powerful method to understand what socio-cultural meanings are included in everyday talk people use for a specific theme. From the result of analysis, four meaings were found: (1) Korean children understand mainly as drawing and/or making, (2)Adjective words used for describing the characteristics of art by Korean children shows what school art is and what it aims, (3) Korean children devide art into school art and others, (4) Korean children understand art is for talented artists. From these findings, art educators should consider ways to change children's distorted understanding of art and widen the boundary of understanding art.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate what socio-cultural value and belief about visual arts are learned and internalized by Korean children. For a long time, children's art-making has been considered as a product of individuals. Therefore, children's art has been understood based on universal developmental information. However, new scholars who are interested in socio-cultural aspects of children's artistic development starts raising questions on this developmental perspective. For example, Pearson (2001) claimed that children's art practice is a social practice. It means that we need to understand children's art practice with in a specific context in which children are engaged in. Through participating in repeated everyday art practices, children can learn social value and belief on art and they produce their art as expected by their society automatically. Therefore, it is important what social value and belief on art Korean children learned and internalized in order to think about the direction of future art education in Korea. For this study, 418 elementary school students were interviewed with a question, "What do you think art is?" There answers are transcribed after interviews and analyzed using the method of discourse analysis which is known as a powerful method to understand what socio-cultural meanings are included in everyday talk people use for a specific theme. From the result of analysis, four meaings were found: (1) Korean children understand mainly as drawing and/or making, (2)Adjective words used for describing the characteristics of art by Korean children shows what school art is and what it aims, (3) Korean children devide art into school art and others, (4) Korean children understand art is for talented artists. From these findings, art educators should consider ways to change children's distorted understanding of art and widen the boundary of understanding art.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김미남, "미술활동에 대한 사회의 기대와 가치의 내면화: 한국 초등학교 아동의 그림 그리기 경험의 분석과 탐구", 미술과 교육, 8(2), pp.77~100 (2007), 한국국제미술교육학회
- 김미남, "아동미술발달 이해를 위한 사회문화적 관점의 학문적 접근들", 미술과 교육, 13(1), pp.103~123 (2012), 한국국제미술교육학회
- Anderson, T., "Art for life" (2005), McGraw-Hill
- Concu, A., "Children’s and researchers’ engagement in the world, In Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspective", pp.3~22 (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Efland, A., "The school art style: A functional analysis", Studies in Art Education, 17(2), pp.37~44 (1976)
- Flick, U., "An introduction to qualitative research" (2006), SAGE Publications Inc
- Gaskins, S., "Children's daily lives in a Mayan village: A case study of culturally constructed roles and activities, In Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspective", pp.25~61 (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Ivashkevich, O., "Drawing in children's lives, In When we were young: New perspetives on the art of the child", pp.44~59 (2006), University of California Press
- Jeffers, C. S., "What happens when we ask, "what is art?"", Art Education, 52(1), pp.40~44 (1999)
- Kim, M., "A review on qualitative research methods in studies on child art : Focused on analyzing children's drawings", Art Education Review, 39, pp.71~98 (2011)
- Leont’ev, A. N., "Activity, consciousness, and personality" (1978), Prentice_Hall, Inc
- Pearson, P., "Towards a theory of children's drawing as social practice", Studies in Art Education, 42(4), pp.348~365 (2001)
- Ritzer, G., "현대 사회학 이론과 그 고전적 뿌리" (2006), 박영사
- Rogoff, B., "The cultural nature of human development" (2003), Oxford UniversityPress
- Silverman D., "Interpreting qualitative data" (2006), SAGE Publications Inc
- Tarr, P., "Preschool children's socialization through art experiences, In The visual arts and early childhood learning", pp.23~27 (1995), National Art Education Association
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Wilson, B., "Child art after modernism: Visual culture and new narratives, In Handbook of research and policy in art education", pp.299~328 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum
- W. Eisner, "Handbook of research and policy in arteducation", pp.299~328, Lawrence Erlbaum