본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이동에서의 탐색 −단일탐색인가 복수탐색인가?

Probing in Move: Single or Multiple?

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper first discusses the issue of what drives movement and adopts Bošcović’s Greed view that the motivation for Move lies in the moving element, not in the target. Bošcović tries to combine this view of Move with the single probe hypothesis which dictates that an expression can probe only once. Although Bošcović provides interesting pieces of evidence for this hypothesis, there still seem to be significant sets of evidence against this hypothesis. After carefully considering the relevant sets of data, this paper argues that the single probe hypothesis is empirically inadequate and has to be replaced by the multiple probe hypothesis which dictates that an expression can probe more than one time as long as there are more than one uninterpretable features requiring probing. It will be shown that this idea, coupled with the Greed type movement theory, can explain all the data adequately.

Abstract

This paper first discusses the issue of what drives movement and adopts Bošcović’s Greed view that the motivation for Move lies in the moving element, not in the target. Bošcović tries to combine this view of Move with the single probe hypothesis which dictates that an expression can probe only once. Although Bošcović provides interesting pieces of evidence for this hypothesis, there still seem to be significant sets of evidence against this hypothesis. After carefully considering the relevant sets of data, this paper argues that the single probe hypothesis is empirically inadequate and has to be replaced by the multiple probe hypothesis which dictates that an expression can probe more than one time as long as there are more than one uninterpretable features requiring probing. It will be shown that this idea, coupled with the Greed type movement theory, can explain all the data adequately.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Boeckx, Cedric, "Bare syntax", 석사, pp.2004
  2. Bošcović, Željko, "The syntax of nonfinite complementation", Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 32 (1997)
  3. Bošcović, Željko, "A-movement and the EPP", Syntax, 5, pp.167~218 (2002)
  4. Bošcović, Željko, "On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.589~644 (2007)
  5. Bošcović, Željko, "On successive cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking, In Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology", pp.195~233 (2008), Elsevier North-Holland
  6. Bošcović, Željko, "On the operator freezing effect", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.249~287 (2008)
  7. Bošcović, Željko, "Last resort with Move and Agree in derivations and representations, In The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism" (2011), Oxford
  8. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory, In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries, In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  12. Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  13. Beyond explanatory adequacy, "Chomsky, Noam", MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, 1~28, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 20 (2001)
  14. Chomsky, Noam, "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
  15. Chomsky, Noam, "On phases, in Robert Freidin, In Foundational issues in linguistic theory" (2008), MIT Press
  16. Chomsky, Noam, "The theory of principles and parameters, In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 1", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  17. Grohmann, Kleanthes K., "Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies" (2003), John Benjamins
  18. Lasnik, Howard, "Last resort, In Minimalism and linguistic theory", pp.1~32 (1995), Hituzi Syobo
  19. Lasnik, Howard, "A course in GB syntax: Lectures on binding and empty categories" (1988), MIT Press
  20. McClosky, James, "Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.57~84 (2000)
  21. Schneider-Zioga, Patricia, "Bounded and unbounded movement", 석사, pp.2005

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)