이동요소중심 분석과 미리보기 문제
Moving Element Driven Approach and a Look-Ahead Problem
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper illustrates that moving element driven approach (MD) has a look-ahead problem as well, even though it was proposed by Bokovi (2007, 2011) to avoid the look-ahead problem of target driven approach (TD) advanced by Chomsky (2000, 2001, 2004). Considering the validity of some important claims of MD, I argue that MD is not superior to TD at all. It is argued that Bokovi’s view that an unvalued uninterpretable Case feature is a trigger of movement is conceptually problematic in that it induces a vacuous movement in the case of Case checking by prepositions and complementizers. It is further argued that the single probe system of movements has to be replaced with the double probe system on both conceptual and empirical grounds. These arguments do not imply, however, that TD is better than MD, because TD has the several problems pointed out in this paper.
Abstract
This paper illustrates that moving element driven approach (MD) has a look-ahead problem as well, even though it was proposed by Bokovi (2007, 2011) to avoid the look-ahead problem of target driven approach (TD) advanced by Chomsky (2000, 2001, 2004). Considering the validity of some important claims of MD, I argue that MD is not superior to TD at all. It is argued that Bokovi’s view that an unvalued uninterpretable Case feature is a trigger of movement is conceptually problematic in that it induces a vacuous movement in the case of Case checking by prepositions and complementizers. It is further argued that the single probe system of movements has to be replaced with the double probe system on both conceptual and empirical grounds. These arguments do not imply, however, that TD is better than MD, because TD has the several problems pointed out in this paper.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김양순, "인상구문과 ECM 구문의 중간 CP 부재와 EPP 자질", 언어연구, 23(4), pp.641~658 (2008), 한국현대언어학회
- 김연승, "이동의 동인에 대한 연구", 언어연구, 23(2), pp.149~172 (2007), 한국현대언어학회
- 손근원, "이동에서의 탐색 −단일탐색인가 복수탐색인가?", 언어연구, 27(4), pp.693~714 (2012), 한국현대언어학회
- Bokovi, Ž., "On multiple feature checking: Multiple wh-fronting and multiple head-movement. In Working Minimalism", pp.159~187 (1999), MIT Press
- Bokovi, Ž, "A-movement and the EPP", Syntax, 5, pp.167~218 (2002)
- Bokovi, Ž, "On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree : An even more minimal theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.589~644 (2007)
- Bokovi, Ž, "On the operator freezing effect", NLLT, 26, pp.249~287 (2008)
- Bokovi, Ž., "On unvalued uninterpretable features", NELS, 39 (2009)
- Bokovi, Ž., "Last resort with Move and Agree in derivations and representations. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism", pp.327~353 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "Approaching UG from below. Ms" (2006), MIT
- Epstein, S. D., "SPEC-ifying the GF “subject.”", 석사, pp.1999
- Epstein, S. D., "Derivations in minimalism: Exploring the elimination of A-chains and the EPP" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Haegeman, L., "English grammar" (1999), Blackwell
- Koizumi, M., "Phrase structure in minimalist syntax", 박사, pp.1995
- Lasnik, H, "Case and expletives revisited : On greed and other human failings", Linguistic Inquiry, 26, pp.615~633 (1995)
- Lasnik, H., "Last resort. In Minimalist Analysis", pp.120~150 (1999), Blackwell
- Lasnik, H., "On the locality of movement. In Functionalism and formalism in linguistics", pp.33~54 (1999), John Benjamins
- Lasnik, H., "Subjects, objects, and the EPP", 석사, pp.2000
- Lasnik, H, "A note on the EPP", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.356~362 (2001)
- Martin, R., "Case, the Extended Projection Principle, and minimalism. In Working minimalism", pp.1~25 (1999), MIT Press
- McClosky, J, "Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.57~84 (2000)
- Pesetsky, D., "The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture", pp.262~294 (2007), John Benjamins
- Rudin, C, "On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.445~501 (1988)
- Runner, J, "Lingering challenges to the raising-to-object and object-control constructions", Syntax, 9, pp.193~213 (2006)
- Sportiche, D, "A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.425~450 (1988)
- Ura, H., "On feature-checking for wh-traces", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.243~280 (1993)