한국인 학습자를 위한 HSK 동사 등급 탐구
HSK verb level search for Korean learners
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to statistically verify that the HSK verb vocabulary grade is not suitable for Korean learners. For example, when targeting Korean learners, even if the verb vocabulary is at the same grade, there may be a difference in average scores between the vocabularies. On the contrary, although the series of the HSK verb vocabulary are different, we try to verify that the scores may be similar among the vocabulary types. First, there was a statistically significant difference in scores for grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’, grade 5 ‘Equivalent’ and grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’. There was a statistically significant difference between the grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘nonequivalent word’. It can be seen that the HSK verb vocabulary grade is not suitable for Korean learners. Second, HSK grade 4 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’, grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’ had similar scores. There was a vocabulary with a similar score difference in the ‘Equivalent’ and ‘nonequivalent word’. The verb vocabulary is grade 4, grade 5, and grade 6, but the difference in grades is not significant. In this study, it was verified whether the difficulty of grade 5 vocabularies could be made similar by adjusting the series of some vocabulary types related to grade 5. As a result, the scores of the grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’, the grade 5 ‘Equivalent’, and the grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’ were similar for the grade 5 subjects.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to statistically verify that the HSK verb vocabulary grade is not suitable for Korean learners. For example, when targeting Korean learners, even if the verb vocabulary is at the same grade, there may be a difference in average scores between the vocabularies. On the contrary, although the series of the HSK verb vocabulary are different, we try to verify that the scores may be similar among the vocabulary types. First, there was a statistically significant difference in scores for grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’, grade 5 ‘Equivalent’ and grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’. There was a statistically significant difference between the grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘nonequivalent word’. It can be seen that the HSK verb vocabulary grade is not suitable for Korean learners. Second, HSK grade 4 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’, grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’ and grade 6 ‘Chinese characters’ had similar scores. There was a vocabulary with a similar score difference in the ‘Equivalent’ and ‘nonequivalent word’. The verb vocabulary is grade 4, grade 5, and grade 6, but the difference in grades is not significant. In this study, it was verified whether the difficulty of grade 5 vocabularies could be made similar by adjusting the series of some vocabulary types related to grade 5. As a result, the scores of the grade 5 ‘Chinese characters’, the grade 5 ‘Equivalent’, and the grade 5 ‘nonequivalent word’ were similar for the grade 5 subjects.
참고문헌 (22)
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구소 중국어대사전편찬실, "중한사전" (2002)
- 김석영, "중국어 평가 문항 작성 기법 연구 ― 신HSK, SNULT, FLEX 선택형 문항에 대한 비판적 분석을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (90), pp.261~288 (2015), 중국어문학연구회
- 나영, "사회과학분야 통계적 연구 방법론의 이해" (2009), 박영사
- 노형진, "SPSS를 활용한 조사방법 및 통계 분석" (2011), 학현사
- 박용진, "Prator의 난이도등급 가설의 검증 - 중국어 문법의 능숙도 시험 개발을 위한 분석 -", 중국어교육과 연구, (28), pp.285~308 (2018), 한국중국어교육학회[DOI]
- 서진현, "한국인 학습자를 위한 현대중국어부사의 등급 설계", 중국어교육과 연구, (24), pp.105~127 (2016), 한국중국어교육학회
- 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제" (2004), 학지사
- 邓守信, "현대중국어 교육문법 연구" (2012), 한국문화사
- 国家汉语水平考试委员会办公室考试中心, "汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲", ~ (2001)
- 孔子学院总部, "新汉语水平考试大纲 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6级", ~ (2015)
- 孙晓明, "第二语言学习者产出性词汇机制研究", 汉语学习, (4) (2009)
- 张江丽, "汉语第二语言学习者接受性词汇量实证研究", 语言文字应用, 3 (2017)
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2012)
- Brown, H. D, "Principles of Language Learning and Teaching" (1980), Prentice-Hall
- Henriksen，B, "Three dimensions of vocabulary development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3) (1999)
- Jiang, Nan, "Lexical Representation and Development in a Second Language", Applied Linguistics, (21) (2000)
- Laufer, B, "Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy" (1997), Cambridge University press
- Laufer，B, "The development of passive and active vocabulary in second language: Same or different?", Applied Linguistics, 19 (1998)
- Nation，I．S．P, "외국어 어휘의 교수와 학습" (2012), 소통 출판사
- Palmer, H. E, "The oral method of teaching language" (1921), Heffer
- Stockwell, Bowen, Martin, "The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish. Contrastive Structure Series", ~ (1965)
- Westney, Paul, "Perspective on Pedagogical Grammar" (1995), Cambridge University Press