A Study on Causes of Low Fertility in Korea - Focusing on Family Value -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today low fertility countries are characterised by low female labour force participation, low gender equity, robust marriage institution, and strong family values. It is presumed that the conflicts between an advanced socioeconomic system and robust family patterns is an important cause of low fertility. Korea is a typical case where the conventional family pattern results in disharmony with socioeconomic development and depresses fertility. The direct cost of children has been rising rapidly due to the Confucian value of education and strong family value. The tight labour market conditions and the increasing uncertainty concerning the future are depressing not only nuptiality, but martial fertility. The robustness of traditional gender role division controls the improvement in compatibility between work and the family and keeps the high opportunity cost of childbearing. Even though the Korean government declared an ambitious pronatal policy, the budget is so limited that its effect is questionable. Moreover, lowest low fertility is attributed to cultural patterns and is beyond family policy.
Abstract
Today low fertility countries are characterised by low female labour force participation, low gender equity, robust marriage institution, and strong family values. It is presumed that the conflicts between an advanced socioeconomic system and robust family patterns is an important cause of low fertility. Korea is a typical case where the conventional family pattern results in disharmony with socioeconomic development and depresses fertility. The direct cost of children has been rising rapidly due to the Confucian value of education and strong family value. The tight labour market conditions and the increasing uncertainty concerning the future are depressing not only nuptiality, but martial fertility. The robustness of traditional gender role division controls the improvement in compatibility between work and the family and keeps the high opportunity cost of childbearing. Even though the Korean government declared an ambitious pronatal policy, the budget is so limited that its effect is questionable. Moreover, lowest low fertility is attributed to cultural patterns and is beyond family policy.
참고문헌 (33)
- 권명희, "여성결혼이민자의 생활실태 및 결혼행복감 결정요인 분석", 한국비교정부학보, 12(2), pp.99~122 (2008), 한국비교정부학회
- 김근식, "기혼취업여성의 삶의 질 결정요인에 관한 구조적 관계분석", 한국자치행정학보, 23(2), pp.167~188 (2009), 한국자치행정학회
- 김승권, "최근 한국사회의 출산율 변화원인과 향후 전망", 한국인구학, 27(2), pp.1~34 (2004), 한국인구학회
- 김종남, "다문화가정 자녀의 교육 실태와 개선방안", 한국비교정부학보, 14(1), pp.281~304 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
- 김진, "일-가정 양립 정책의 변화 추이-에스핑-앤더슨의 복지국가유형을 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 15(3), pp.255~274 (2011), 한국비교정부학회
- 결혼행태 변화와 출산율의 상관성 연구, "변용찬", 한국보건사회연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 30-3 (2010)
- 손흥숙, "저출산과 가족지원 서비스에 관한 연구", 한국가족복지회, 10(1), pp.31~49 (2005)
- 신재주, "장애아동 보육정책 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 13(1), pp.269~290 (2009), 한국비교정부학회
- 윤성호, "지방자치단체의 여성일자리 창출 노력 -사회서비스 분야 일자리를 중심으로-", 한국자치행정학보, 23(2), pp.385~405 (2009), 한국자치행정학회
- 윤성호, "지역간 차별 출산력과 지방자치단체의 대응", 한국자치행정학보, 24(2), pp.441~463 (2010), 한국자치행정학회
- 은기수, "한국인의 가족가치: 5개국 비교연구", 정신문화연구, 27(3), pp.137~182 (2004), 한국학중앙연구원
- 은기수, "한국의 가족가치에 대한 국제비교연구", 한국인구학, 28(1), pp.107~132 (2005), 한국인구학회
- 이미란, "기혼 여성이 처한 환경적 요인이 자녀에 대한 가치관과 출산 행태에 미치는 영향", 한국가족관계학회지, 15(1), pp.99~121 (2010), 한국가족관계학회
- 이인숙, "저출산의 요인분석과 사회복지적 함의", 한국사회복지학, 57(4), pp.67~90 (2005), 한국사회복지학회
- 임국환, "우리나라 출산율 저하, 그 원인과 대책", 보건과학논집, 31(2), pp.103~114 (2005)
- 차경욱, "저출산 가계와 출산계획 있는 가계의 경제구조 비교 분석", 한국가정관리학회지, 23(2), pp.137~148 (2005), 한국가정관리학회
- 최낙관, "한국 저출산문제의 구조적 원인과 대응방안", 한국자치행정학보, 19(4), pp.173~205 (2005)
- 한국의 저출산관련 사회경제적 연관정책방향, "최은경", ~ (2005)
- 통계청, "인구동태통계연보", ~
- 한국의 보건복지 동향 2004, "한국보건사회연구원", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2005)
- 2006년 전국 출산력 및 가족보건 복지실태조사, "한국보건사회연구원", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2006)
- Becker, G. S, "A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge" (1991), Harvard University Press
- Leaving Home in Europe: The Experience of Cohorts Born around 1960, "Billari, F. C.", Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, ~, pp.WP-2001-014 (2001)
- Patterns of Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe, "Billari, F. C.", Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, ~, pp.WP-2002-040 (2002)
- Chang, K. S, "The State and Families in South Korea's Compressed Fertility Transition", Journal of Population and Social Security, pp.596~610 (2002)
- Dalla Zuanna, G, "The Banquet of Aeolus: a Familistic Interpretation of Italy's Lowest-Low Fertility", Demographic Research, 4, pp.131~162 (2001)
- Easterlin, R. A, "What Will 1984 Be Like? Socioeconomic Implications of Recent Twist in Age Structure", Demography, 15, pp.397~421 (1978)
- Hoorens, S., "Sweden's Varying Success in Offsetting Low Fertility", Seoul-Miami Conference on Population and Politics, Sociology and Gerontology (2005)
- Kim, J., "Causes and Policy Implications of the Lowest Low Fertility in South Korea", 여성건강, 10(2), pp.113~133 (2009)
- Kohler, H. F., "Emergence of Lowest Low Fertility in Europe during the 1990s", Population and Development Review, 28, pp.641~681 (2002)
- Reher, D, "Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts", Population and Development Review, 24, pp.203~231 (1998)
- Suzuki, T, "Low Fertility and Governmental Intervention in Japan and Korea", The Japanese Journal of Population, 10(1), pp.60~78 (2012)
- Yamaguchi, K, "Determinants of Low Fertility: Roles of Husband, Work Place, Government and Society", Japanese Journal of Research on Household Economics, 66, pp.57~67 (2005)