영어 트위터 메시지에 나타난 공손전략 분석
A Study on Politeness Strategies in English on Twitter
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Social Network Service(SNS) is widely used these days and many people tend to communicate with each other on SNS. Therefore, it can be expected that when communicating on Twitter, people use different politeness strategies related to ‘face’ in different contexts. This paper aims to analyze what type of politeness strategies are used in English Twitter threads. Two American politician Twitter feeds were chosen for the research and 411 tweets were analyzed in terms of tweet context and the tweets were divided into five categories. In each category, each tweet was analyzed based on Brown & Levinson(1987)’s politeness strategies. The highest tweet messages are in regard to praise and expressing support and opposing and criticising was next. The results show that people used the positive politeness strategy more when praising and expressing support. On the other hand, the negative politeness strategy was the highest strategy in opposing and criticising categories. From the research, the results shows that it is difficult to engage in Face Threatening Acts(FTA) even though people have relative anonymity when communicating on-line through SNS.
Abstract
Social Network Service(SNS) is widely used these days and many people tend to communicate with each other on SNS. Therefore, it can be expected that when communicating on Twitter, people use different politeness strategies related to ‘face’ in different contexts. This paper aims to analyze what type of politeness strategies are used in English Twitter threads. Two American politician Twitter feeds were chosen for the research and 411 tweets were analyzed in terms of tweet context and the tweets were divided into five categories. In each category, each tweet was analyzed based on Brown & Levinson(1987)’s politeness strategies. The highest tweet messages are in regard to praise and expressing support and opposing and criticising was next. The results show that people used the positive politeness strategy more when praising and expressing support. On the other hand, the negative politeness strategy was the highest strategy in opposing and criticising categories. From the research, the results shows that it is difficult to engage in Face Threatening Acts(FTA) even though people have relative anonymity when communicating on-line through SNS.
참고문헌 (20)
- 백선기, "사회적 네트워크 서비스(Social Network Service)에서 표출되는 표현들의 기호적 속성과 의미의 함축성 - 주요 사회 의제에 관한 트위터 내용들에 대한 기호학적 분석을 중심으로", 기호학 연구, 30, pp.37~75 (2011), 한국기호학회
- 송경숙, "영어 트위터 사이버 커뮤니케이션에서 인용하기와 대화체 구성하기 담화전략", 새한영어영문학, 55(1), pp.233~254 (2013), 새한영어영문학회
- SNS(소셜 네트워크 서비스) 이용현황., "신선", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.KISDI STAT Report 13-04 (2013)
- 소셜미디어에서의 온라인 정치담론의 특성, "이원태", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.디지털 컨버젼스 기반 미래연구(II), 10-11 (2010)
- 이정복, "인터넷 통신 언어 실태와 세대 간 의사소통의 문제", 배달말, (49), pp.29~69 (2011), 배달말학회
- 이정복, "스마트폰 시대의 통신 언어 특징과 연구 과제", 사회언어학, 20(1), pp.177~211 (2012), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
- 허상희, "대학생들의 전자편지에 대한 화용론적 분석", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (64), pp.155~190 (2013), 한민족어문학회
- Brown, P., "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Cho, S. E., "Cross-cultural Comparison of Korean and American Social Network Sites: Exploring Cultural Differences in Social Relationships and Self- presentation", Ph. D., pp.2010
- Davis, B., "Electronic Discourse: Linguistic Individuals in Virtual Space" (1997), State University of New York
- Fraser, B., "Perspectives on Politeness", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.219~236 (1990)
- Goffman, E., "Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior" (1967), Anchor Books
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts" (1975), Academic Press
- Hatamoto, "Advances in Natural Language Processing" (2012), Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Haugh, M, "The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.84~110 (2007)
- Lakoff, R, "The logic of politeness, or minding your P’s and Q’s", Proceeding of ninth regional meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, pp.292~305 (1973)
- Leech, G. N., "Principals of pragmatics" (1983), Longman