본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

함축을 통한 영어 광고 분석

An Analysis of English Commercials in Terms of the Theory of Implicature

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper focuses on how English commercial conversations work and how they differ from ordinary conversations. Unlike ordinary conversations, dialogs in English commercials are more complicated. We analyze English commercials by the Maxims of Grice (1975) focusing on how a speaker(an advertiser) sends a message to a hearer(an audience) and how the hearer(the audience) takes the speaker’s (the advertiser’s) intended message. And this paper also analyzes English TV commercials based on the Relevance Theory of Sperber & Wilson (1986) to describe how an advertiser’s intended massage is taken by a hearer (a TV audience). In ordinary conversations, if a hearer does not have the same background information or experience, he/she will not understand the speaker’s intention. Similarly, if a hearer (an audience) does not have appropriate background information in English TV commercial conversations, he/she will interpret the speaker’s intention differently.

Abstract

This paper focuses on how English commercial conversations work and how they differ from ordinary conversations. Unlike ordinary conversations, dialogs in English commercials are more complicated. We analyze English commercials by the Maxims of Grice (1975) focusing on how a speaker(an advertiser) sends a message to a hearer(an audience) and how the hearer(the audience) takes the speaker’s (the advertiser’s) intended message. And this paper also analyzes English TV commercials based on the Relevance Theory of Sperber & Wilson (1986) to describe how an advertiser’s intended massage is taken by a hearer (a TV audience). In ordinary conversations, if a hearer does not have the same background information or experience, he/she will not understand the speaker’s intention. Similarly, if a hearer (an audience) does not have appropriate background information in English TV commercial conversations, he/she will interpret the speaker’s intention differently.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강미경, "대화 관련성 이론과 발화의 이해", 언어연구, 15, pp.5~17 (1999)
  2. 강미경, "관련성 원리에 입각한 대화함축과 맥락함축", 언어연구, 16, pp.5~22 (2000)
  3. 구자은, "화용론과 담화" (2005), 울산대학교 출판부
  4. 권혁찬, "TV 광고에 나타난 대화 분석", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2001
  5. 송경숙, "담화 화용론" (2005), 한국문화사
  6. 이명천, "광고학 개론" (2010), 커뮤니케이션북스
  7. 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
  8. 이성범, "영어화용론" (2002), 한국문화사
  9. 정희자, "담화와 추론" (2002), 한국문화사
  10. 정희자, "담화와 비유어" (2004), 한국문화사
  11. 최명원, "화용론 연구" (2002), 태학사
  12. 최진, "영어 담화 표지에 나타난 화용적 특성", 언어연구, 32(1), pp.141~160 (2016), 한국현대언어학회
  13. Blakemore, D., "Understanding Utterance" (1992), Blackwell
  14. Betty J. B., "Introduction to Pragmatics" (2012), Blackwell
  15. Gazdar, G., "Pragmatics: Impicature, Presupposition and Logical Form" (1979), Academic Press
  16. Gennaro, C., "Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics" (1990), The MIT Press
  17. Grice, H. P, "Pragmatics" (1975), Oxford University Press
  18. Harnish, R. M., "Pragmatics" (1976), Oxford University Press
  19. Mey, J., "Pragmatics" (1993), Blackwell
  20. Peter G., "Doing Pragmatics" (1995), Arnold
  21. Saeed, J., "Semantics" (1997), Blackwell
  22. Sperber, D, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Blackwell
  23. Strawson, P., "Introduction to Logical Theory" (1952), Methuen
  24. Yule, G., "Pragmatics" (1996), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)