본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mapping Alterity: Maps, Borders, and Social Relations in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This essay examines the role of maps and geographic knowledge in the perception of spatiality and social relations as represented in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. The essay is structured in three parts. The first part probes the problematic nature of modern cartography in conjunction with modernity, introducing major scholarship on maps and cartography and then critically reviewing its limits, thereby contesting the dichotomy between modern and premodern mapping. In the second part, which focuses on the role of maps and geography in the development of the narrative, the essay addresses how geographic knowledge and cartographic power emerged as a new form of cultural competence, contributing to social and political life, military operations, and political aspirations for geospatial management and territorial expansion. The political leaders’ concerted efforts to recover the Central Plain (the Zhongyuan) embody their desire to control the center and to legitimize the Han’s claim of centrality for that region, the presumed origin of China. By discussing the intricate relationship between verbal language and visual language and the rhetoric of alterity used to portray the Man people with similes, the essay argues that the premodern logic and mechanisms of boundary making, based on the center‐periphery dichotomy and used to demarcate territorial or and cultural boundaries, were not dissimilar to those of modern times. Lastly, in grappling with the question of the significance of the novel’s representations of alterity, the essay explores how representations of cultural differences can be used to deconstruct the hierarchies that they are meant to establish. Thus, the significance of mapping does not necessarily reside in its utilization for ordering and hegemony, but for inquiring into the cultural potential for unmarking and decentering.

Abstract

This essay examines the role of maps and geographic knowledge in the perception of spatiality and social relations as represented in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. The essay is structured in three parts. The first part probes the problematic nature of modern cartography in conjunction with modernity, introducing major scholarship on maps and cartography and then critically reviewing its limits, thereby contesting the dichotomy between modern and premodern mapping. In the second part, which focuses on the role of maps and geography in the development of the narrative, the essay addresses how geographic knowledge and cartographic power emerged as a new form of cultural competence, contributing to social and political life, military operations, and political aspirations for geospatial management and territorial expansion. The political leaders’ concerted efforts to recover the Central Plain (the Zhongyuan) embody their desire to control the center and to legitimize the Han’s claim of centrality for that region, the presumed origin of China. By discussing the intricate relationship between verbal language and visual language and the rhetoric of alterity used to portray the Man people with similes, the essay argues that the premodern logic and mechanisms of boundary making, based on the center‐periphery dichotomy and used to demarcate territorial or and cultural boundaries, were not dissimilar to those of modern times. Lastly, in grappling with the question of the significance of the novel’s representations of alterity, the essay explores how representations of cultural differences can be used to deconstruct the hierarchies that they are meant to establish. Thus, the significance of mapping does not necessarily reside in its utilization for ordering and hegemony, but for inquiring into the cultural potential for unmarking and decentering.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Agamben, Giorgio, "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life" (1998), Stanford University Press
  2. Anderson, Benedict., "Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism" (1991), Verso
  3. Black, Jeremy, "Maps and Politics" (1997), University of Chicago Press
  4. Chow, Rey, "Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema" (1995), Columbia University
  5. Creel, Herrlee Glessner, "Studies in Early Chinese Culture" (1937), Waverly Press
  6. Eberhard, Wolfram, "A Dictionary of Chinese Symbols: Hidden Symbols in Chinese Life and Thought" (1986), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  7. Lo Kuan‐Chung, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" (1959), Charles E. Tuttle Company
  8. Lukács, Gyor̈gy, "The Historical Novel" (1983), University of Nebraska Press
  9. Luo Guanzhong, "Sanguo yanyi" (1973), Renmin wenxue chubanshe
  10. May, J. A, "Kant’s Concept of Geography and Its Relation to Recent Geographical Thought" (1970), University of Toronto Press
  11. Ronan, Colin A, "The Shorter Science and Civilization in China: An Abridgement of Joseph Needham’s Original Text" (1978), Cambridge University Press
  12. Sakai, Naoki, "Translation and Subjectivity: On Japan and Cultural Nationalism" (1997), University of Minnesota Press
  13. 신동순, "중국 대중문화의 초국적 유통과 소비: 한국의 ‘삼국지’ 현상 초론(初論)", 중어중문학, (47), pp.413~446 (2010), 한국중어중문학회
  14. Wilkinson, Endymion P, "Chinese History : A Manual. Revised and enlarged edition" (2000), Harvard University Press
  15. Winichakul, Thongchai, "Siam Mapped : A History of the Geo‐Body of a Nation" (1994), University of Hawaii Press
  16. Zhu Yixuan, "Collection of Materials on Romance of the Three Kingdoms" (2012), Nankai daxue chubanshe

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)