본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Development of Conplementizer and Relativizer that in the History of English

The Development of Conplementizer and Relativizer that in the History of Englis

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how the complementizer that and the relativizer that developed in the history of English language. The developmental process of the complementizer that shows that the demonstrative þæt was changed into the complementizer þæt through grammaticalization and category reanalysis long before the OE period. The extension of the grammatical function of that from a complementizer to a relativizer proves that the complementizer þat spread into the domain of relativizers from the early ME period. Given the lexical item þæt that changed from a demonstrative to a complementizer, it is true that the complementizer þæt began to perform the grammatical function of a finite tense marker indicating the finiteness of embedded clauses from the Germanic period. This means that the complementizer þæt started encoding finite tense feature with φ-features at the outset. And additionally it began to carry out the grammatical function of a declarative force marker from the ME period. In Present-day English, while finite tense feature should be or can be realized as null form without CP by means of the transmission of it from C to T, declarative force feature is generally realized as overt form in C. The growth of declarative force feature as a grammatical rule was complete by the time C-oriented clausal-head system was changed into T-oriented clausal-head system with the demise of V-2 in late ME. The syntactic differentiation between the complementizer that and the relativizer that is confirmed by the contrastive grammaticality of that-trace construction in complement clauses and in relative clauses. The time that-trace effect and counter that-trace effect came to exert its robust power of a grammatical rule was in gear with the disappearance of overt verb movement and introduction of do as an auxiliary verb.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Steven Paul, "The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect" (1987)
  2. Allen,Louise Cynthia, "Topics in Diachronic English Syntax" (1980), Garland Publishing
  3. Bean,Marian C, "The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English" (1983), Croom Helm
  4. Bever, "A Diachronic Model of the Evolution of Language", pp.433~463 (1971)
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, Step by Step", pp.89~156 (2000), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  6. Kenstovicz, Michael, "Derivation by Phase, Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  7. Belletti, Adriana, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", 3, pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  8. "On Phases" (2005), MIT
  9. Davidson, Donal, "On Saying That, Readings in the Philosophy of Language", pp.817~832 (1997), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  10. Denison,David, "English Historical Syntax" (1993), Longman
  11. Gelderen,Elly van, "The Rise of Functional Categories" (1993), John Benjamins
  12. "The CP and Split CP Cross-linguistically" (2003), Arizona State University
  13. Holmberg, Anders, "The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax" (1995), Oxford University Press
  14. Huddleston, Rodney, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  15. Jackson, Dan, "The Historical Origins of the "That-trace Effect"" (2006)
  16. Jespersen, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1961)
  17. Kiparsky, Paul, "The Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax", pp.140~169 (1995), Oxford University Press
  18. Platzack, Christer, "The Loss of Verb Second in English and French" (1995), Oxford University Press
  19. Radford, Andrew, "Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  20. "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  21. Rizz, Luigi, "The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery, Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Dordrecht[DOI]
  22. Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change:A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  23. Simpson, John Andrew, "The Oxford English Dictionary" (2000), Oxford: Clarendon
  24. Traugott, "The Cambridge History of the English Language", meⅰ, pp.168~289 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  25. Warner,Anthony, "Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax" (1982), London and Canberra

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)