본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Divergence of Old English Demonstratives

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to illuminate the diachronic divergence of the Old English simple demonstratives and its implications on grammaticalization, on the basis of the relevant data drawn from Old English texts and Peterborough Chronicle. In Old English, evidence against prototypical demonstratives can be confirmed in the Poss-Dem construction and their usage as a mere definiteness marker, both of which involved the XP > X0 reanalysis representing the transition stage. Early Middle English saw the completion of their shift into the definite article and further reduction into a clitic. A series of those changes constitute a classic example of unidirectional progression towards grammaticalization. In contrast, prototypical demonstratives continued to preserve deictic meaning in Old English, appearing in the SpecDP via movement. In Early Middle English, they took various forms as a process of renewal against the emergence of the definite article but converged into a single form in the end. At the same time, breakdown in morphology made them lose the uF activating movement and triggered the move > merge reanalysis.

Abstract

This study aims to illuminate the diachronic divergence of the Old English simple demonstratives and its implications on grammaticalization, on the basis of the relevant data drawn from Old English texts and Peterborough Chronicle. In Old English, evidence against prototypical demonstratives can be confirmed in the Poss-Dem construction and their usage as a mere definiteness marker, both of which involved the XP > X0 reanalysis representing the transition stage. Early Middle English saw the completion of their shift into the definite article and further reduction into a clitic. A series of those changes constitute a classic example of unidirectional progression towards grammaticalization. In contrast, prototypical demonstratives continued to preserve deictic meaning in Old English, appearing in the SpecDP via movement. In Early Middle English, they took various forms as a process of renewal against the emergence of the definite article but converged into a single form in the end. At the same time, breakdown in morphology made them lose the uF activating movement and triggered the move > merge reanalysis.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Abney, S. P., "The English Noun Phrases in its Sentential Aspect", 석사, pp.1987
  2. Abraham, W., "Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Constraint, and Historical Emergence", pp.1~20 (2007), John Benjamins
  3. Allen, C, "Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence" (2008), Oxford University Press
  4. Bartnik, A, "Categorial Heterogenity : Old English Determiners", Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 43, pp.75~96 (2007)
  5. Nicholas Catasso, "The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis", Journal of Universal Language, 12(1), pp.7~46 (2011), 언어연구소
  6. Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  7. Einarsson, S., "Icelandic: Grammar, Text and Glossary (2nd edition)" (2000), Johns Hopkins University Press
  8. Gelderen, E. v, "The Definiteness Cycle in Germanic", Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 19, pp.275~308 (2007)
  9. Gelderen, E. v., "The Diachrony of Pronouns and Demonstratives" (2011), Arizona State University
  10. Giusti, G., "The New Comparative Syntax", pp.95~123 (1997), Blackwell
  11. Giusti, G., "Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi", pp.157~171 (2001), North Holland
  12. Greenberg, J. H., "Universals of Human Language, Volume 3: Word Structure", pp.249~295 (1978), Stanford University Press
  13. Hogg, R. M., "The Cambridge History of the English Language vol 1", pp.67~167 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  14. Hopper, P., "Grammaticalization (2nd edition)" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  15. Irvine, S. (ed. )., "The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition Vol 7" (2004), D. S. Brewer
  16. Lightfoot, D., "Principles of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Cambridge University Press
  17. Lyons, C., "Definiteness" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  18. Mitchell, B., "Old English Syntax" (1985), The Clarendon Press
  19. Prokosch, E., "A Comparative Germanic Grammar" (1939), Linguistic Society of America
  20. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  21. Ringe, D., "A Linguistic History of English. Volume I. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic" (2006), Oxford University Press
  22. Roberts, I., "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  23. Rupp, L., "Definite Article Reduction", Folia Linguistica Historia, 28(1-2), pp.215~249 (2008)
  24. Siebolt, N. H, "Personal Pronouns in the Dialects of England: A Corpus Study of Grammatical Variation in Spontaneous Speech", pp.2010
  25. Sommerer, M. L., "Old English Se: from Demonstrative to Article. A Usage-Based Study of Nominal Determination and Category Emergence", pp.2011
  26. Traugott, E., "The Cambridge History of the English Language vol 1", pp.168~289 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  27. Van de Velde, F., "The Emergence of the Determiner in the Dutch NP", Linguistics, 48, pp.263~299 (2010)
  28. Viereek, W., "Medieval Dialectology", pp.295~301 (1995), Mouten de Gruyter
  29. Wood, J., "Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Constraint, and Historical Emergence", pp.339~361 (2007), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)