본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Adnominal Possessives and Adjectivehood in Old English

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study investigates morphological and syntactic properties distinguishing inflected adnominal possessives from uninflected ones. Both types of possessives were morphologically differentiated in terms of etymology and the presence of strong adjective endings. In addition, dislocation into the postnominal position was permitted only to inflected possessives. These asymmetries can be elucidated by the hypothesis that inflected possessives shared adjectivehood with ordinary adjectives whereas uninflected ones did not. Inflected possessives carried strong adjective inflection to mark adjectivehood rather than (in)definiteness. Subsequently, they should be assumed to be merged as a specifier of a functional projection below DP relevant to adjectival agreement. They could end up in the postnominal position after N-to-D movement across them. In contrast, the position of merge for uninflected possessives should be the specifier of DP due to their lack of adjectivehood, which excludes the possibility that they could occupy the postnominal position as a result of N-to-D movement.

Abstract

This study investigates morphological and syntactic properties distinguishing inflected adnominal possessives from uninflected ones. Both types of possessives were morphologically differentiated in terms of etymology and the presence of strong adjective endings. In addition, dislocation into the postnominal position was permitted only to inflected possessives. These asymmetries can be elucidated by the hypothesis that inflected possessives shared adjectivehood with ordinary adjectives whereas uninflected ones did not. Inflected possessives carried strong adjective inflection to mark adjectivehood rather than (in)definiteness. Subsequently, they should be assumed to be merged as a specifier of a functional projection below DP relevant to adjectival agreement. They could end up in the postnominal position after N-to-D movement across them. In contrast, the position of merge for uninflected possessives should be the specifier of DP due to their lack of adjectivehood, which excludes the possibility that they could occupy the postnominal position as a result of N-to-D movement.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Allen, L. C, "Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence" (2008), Oxford University Press
  2. Beekes, R, "Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction" (2011), John Benjamins
  3. Bauer, B, "Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Constraint, and Historical Emergence", pp.134~140 (2007), John Benjamins
  4. Daniel, M, "The Oxford Handbook of Case", pp.626~634 (2009), Oxford University Press
  5. Julien, M, "Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective" (2005), John Benjamins
  6. Kendall, B. K, "The Metrical Grammar of Beowulf" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  7. Kuhn, H, "Zur Wortstellung und-betonung im Altgermanischen", Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutchen Sprache und Literatur, 57, pp.1~109 (1933)
  8. Lichtenheld, A, "Das Schwache Adjectiv im Ags", ZFDA, 16, pp.325~393 (1873)
  9. Lyons, C, "Definiteness" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  10. Mallory, J, "The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo- European and the Proto-Indo-European World" (2006), Oxford University Press
  11. Mitchell, B, "Old English Syntax" (1985), The Clarendon Press
  12. Peters, L, "Lexical Evidence for the Relative Chronology of Old English Poetry Andreas to Beowulf", PMLA, 66, pp.844~863 (1951)
  13. Ringe, D, "From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic" (2006), Oxford University Press
  14. Ringe, D, "The Development of Old English" (2014), Oxford University Press
  15. Suzuki, S, "The Metrical Organization of Beowulf: Prototype and Isomorphism" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  16. Terasawa, J, "Old English Meter" (2011), University of Toronto Press
  17. Traugott, E, "The Cambridge History of the English Language vol 1", pp.168~289 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  18. Walkden, G, "Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic" (2014), Oxford University Press
  19. 윤희철, "On the Possessive-Demonstrative Construction in Old English", 언어, 39(1), pp.109~132 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  20. 윤희철, "Weak Adjectives and Definiteness in Old English", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.69~95 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  21. 윤희철, "Vocatives and Determinerless Weak Adjectives in Old English Prose", 영어학연구, 21(3), pp.85~105 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)