English Have Causatives and the Selectional Variation between Have and Make
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the structure of English periphrastic causatives formed with have in comparison with its make counterpart. Evaluating the interrelations between agent-oriented adverbs and agency (Pylkkänen 2002; 2008, Kim 2012), I show that agent-oriented adverbs do not serve as a rigorous test for detecting the structural unit of VoiceP. I propose that causative have must select for verbal structures that correspond to VoiceP, with supporting evidence from ellipsis and the possibility to embed a passive. In this sense, have causatives behave in parallel with make causatives, which are attested to be Voice-selecting (Tubino Blanco 2011). The two causatives, however, differ in two respects. First, causative have is strictly Voice-selecting, unlike causative make. Second, the two causatives differ in the type of the verbalizer of the matrix clause – have is associated with vBE, make with vCAUS.
Abstract
This study investigates the structure of English periphrastic causatives formed with have in comparison with its make counterpart. Evaluating the interrelations between agent-oriented adverbs and agency (Pylkkänen 2002; 2008, Kim 2012), I show that agent-oriented adverbs do not serve as a rigorous test for detecting the structural unit of VoiceP. I propose that causative have must select for verbal structures that correspond to VoiceP, with supporting evidence from ellipsis and the possibility to embed a passive. In this sense, have causatives behave in parallel with make causatives, which are attested to be Voice-selecting (Tubino Blanco 2011). The two causatives, however, differ in two respects. First, causative have is strictly Voice-selecting, unlike causative make. Second, the two causatives differ in the type of the verbalizer of the matrix clause – have is associated with vBE, make with vCAUS.
참고문헌 (37)
- Alexiadou, A., "Phases of Interpretation", pp.187~211 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- The two causative haves are the two possessive haves, "Belvin, R. S.", 19~34, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 20 (1993)
- Belvin, R. S., "Inside Events: The Non-possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and Semantic Conceptualization of Events", 박사, pp.1996
- Belvin, R. S., "There, happens, to, be, have", Lingua, 101, pp.151~183 (1997)
- Bjorkman, B., "BE-ing Default: the Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries", 박사, pp.2011
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Cocchi, G, "An explanation of the split in the choice of perfect auxiliaries", Probus, 6, pp.87~102 (1994)
- Coon, J, "Transitivity in Chol: A new argument for the split-VP hypothesis", In Proceedings of NELS, 41 (2011)
- Collins, C, "A smuggling approach to the passive in English", Syntax, 8, pp.81~120 (2005)
- Copley, B, "The plan's the thing: deconstructing futurate meanings", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.261~274 (2008)
- Copley, B., "The Semantics of the Future" (2009), Routledge
- Copley, B., "Futurates, directors and have-causatives", Snippets, 19, pp.5~6 (2009)
- Thematic underspecification: The case of have, "Cowper, E.", 85~93, pp.Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (1989)
- Cuervo, M., "Datives at Large", 박사, pp.2003
- Folli, R., "On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over", Studia Linguistica, 60, pp.1~35 (2006)
- Folli, R., "Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.197~238 (2007)
- Freeze, R, "Existentials and other locatives", Language, 68, pp.553~595 (1992)
- Givón, T, "The Grammar of Causative Constructions;The Grammar of Causative Constructions", Syntax and Semantics, 7, pp.325~351 (1976)
- Haider, H., "The parameter of auxiliary selection: Italian-German contrasts", Linguistics, 25, pp.1029~1055 (1987)
- Hale, K., "The View from Building 20: A Festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~108 (1993), MIT
- Harley, H., "Subjects, Events and Licensing", 박사, pp.1995
- Harley, H., "La Grammaire de la Possession", pp.195~226 (1998), Universiti Paris X – Nanterre
- Harley, H, "Wanting, having, and getting: a note on Fodor and Lepore 1998", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.255~267 (2004)
- Harley, H., "Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística", pp.2008, ABRALIN and FALE
- Harley, H, "External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the independence of Voice and v", Lingua, 28, pp.34~57 (2013)
- Kallulli, D., "Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6", pp.201~225 (2006), Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris
- Kim, K, "Argument structure licensing and English have", Journal of Linguistics, 48, pp.71~105 (2012)
- Kratzer, A., "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity" (1995), MIT Press
- Marantz, A., "No escape from syntax. Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp.201~225 (1997)
- Perlmutter. D, "Multiattachment and the unaccusative hypothesis: the perfect auxiliary in Italian", Probus, 1, pp.63~119 (1989)
- Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing arguments", 박사, pp.2002
- Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Ritter, E., "Deriving causation", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, pp.519~555 (1993)
- Ritter, E., "The function of have", Lingua, 101, pp.295~321 (1997)
- Rosen, C, "The Interface between Semantic Roles and Initial Grammatical Relations. Perlmutter D. and C. Rosen(eds. )Studies in Relational Grammar", pp.38~77 (1984), Studies in Relational Grammar
- Tubino Blanco, Mercedes, "Causatives in Minimalism" (2011), John Benjamins