Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System의 요추거동에 대한 생체역학적 분석
Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System on Lumbar Kinematics: A Finite Element Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many recent studies suggest that the posterior dynamic stabilization(PDS) can be a more physiologically-relevant alternative to the rigid fixation for the patients suffering from low back pain. However, its biomechanical effects or clinically proven efficacies still remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated kinematic behaviors of the lower lumbar spine with the PDS system and then compared to those of the rigid fixation system using finite element (FE) analysis. A validated FE model of intact lumbar spine(L2-L5) was developed. The implanted model was then constructed after modification from the intact to simulate two kinds of pedicle screw systems (PDS and the rigid fixation). Hybrid protocol was used to flex, extend, laterally bend and axially rotate the FE model. Results showed that the PDS systems are more flexible than rigid fixation systems, yet not flexible enough to preserve motion. PDS system allowed 16.2~42.2% more intersegmental rotation than the rigid fixation at the implanted level. One the other hand, at the adjacent level it allowed more range of motion (2.0%~8.3%) than the rigid fixation. The center of rotation of the PDS model remained closer to that of the intact spine. These results suggest that the PDS system could be able to prevent excessive motion at the adjacent levels and restore the spinal kinematics.
Abstract
Many recent studies suggest that the posterior dynamic stabilization(PDS) can be a more physiologically-relevant alternative to the rigid fixation for the patients suffering from low back pain. However, its biomechanical effects or clinically proven efficacies still remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated kinematic behaviors of the lower lumbar spine with the PDS system and then compared to those of the rigid fixation system using finite element (FE) analysis. A validated FE model of intact lumbar spine(L2-L5) was developed. The implanted model was then constructed after modification from the intact to simulate two kinds of pedicle screw systems (PDS and the rigid fixation). Hybrid protocol was used to flex, extend, laterally bend and axially rotate the FE model. Results showed that the PDS systems are more flexible than rigid fixation systems, yet not flexible enough to preserve motion. PDS system allowed 16.2~42.2% more intersegmental rotation than the rigid fixation at the implanted level. One the other hand, at the adjacent level it allowed more range of motion (2.0%~8.3%) than the rigid fixation. The center of rotation of the PDS model remained closer to that of the intact spine. These results suggest that the PDS system could be able to prevent excessive motion at the adjacent levels and restore the spinal kinematics.
참고문헌 (28)
- A. S. Hilibrand, "Degenerative lumbar stenosis : Diag- nosis and management", J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg, 7, pp.239~249 (1999)
- V. M. Taylor, "Low back pain hospitalization: Recent United States trends and regional variations", Spine, 19, pp.1207~1213 (1994)
- K. E. Johnsson, "The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis", Clin. Orthop, 279, pp.82~86 (1992)
- 조진모, "고령환자의 요추부 척추관 협착증의 수술적 치료-부분 척추후궁 절제술을 통한 양측 척추공의 확장술-", 대한신경외과학회지, 35(5), pp.492~497 (2004), 대한신경외과학회
- S. I. Suk, "Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities", Spine, 26(18), pp.2049~2057 (2001)
- I. Oda, "Biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar multi-segmental fixation", Spine, 25(18), pp.2303~2311 (2000)
- T. Akamura, "Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignment", Spine, 28, pp.1560~1566 (2003)
- C. Chen, "Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation", Medical Engineering and Physics, 27, pp.487~496 (2005)
- D. H. Chow, "Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segment", Spine, 21, pp.549~555 (1996)
- W. Schmoelz, "Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments : an in vitro experiment", Journal of Spinal Disorder & Techniques, 16(4), pp.418~423 (2003)
- D. K. Sengupta, "Fulcrum assisted soft stabili- zation system", Spine, 30(9), pp.1019~1029 (2005)
- M. M. Panjabi, "Adjacent-level effects: Design of a new test protocol and finite element model simulations of disc replacement", pp.45~58 (2005), Roundtables in Spine Surgery; Spine Biomec-hanics,St.Louis,MO:Quality Medical Publishing
- Y. H. Ahn, "Comparison of the load sharing characteristic between semi-rigid and rigid pedicle screw systems", 15th Annual symposium on computational methods in orthopaedic biomechanics, San Diego, CA, US, pp.16~ (2007)
- T. Zander, "Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclin- cation", Clinical Biomechanics, 16, pp.73~80 (2001)
- K. K. Lee, "Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading", IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(3), pp.393~399 (2004)
- V. K. Goel, "Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc: Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads", Spine, 20(6), pp.689~698 (1995)
- S. A. Shirazi-Adl, "Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression: A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study", Spine, 9, pp.120~134 (1984)
- M. Sharma, "Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability", Spine, 20(8), pp.887~900 (1995)
- T. H. Smit, "Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone", Spine, 22, pp.2823~2833 (1997)
- M. Aebi, "The internal skeletal fixation system; new treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and other spinal disorders", Clin. Orthop, 227, pp.30~43 (1988)
- I. Yamamoto, "Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint", Spine, 14(11), pp.1256~1260 (1989)
- S. Vishnubhotla, "Kinematics Analysis of Dynamic Stabilization System for the Lumbar Spine", pp.1278~, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society
- V. K. Goel, "Effects of Charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol", Spine, 30(24), pp.2755~2764 (2005)
- A. G. Viscogliosi, "Beyond total disc, The future of spine surgery", pp.131~198 (2004), Viscogliosi Bros., LLC, New York
- D.K.Sengupta, "Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain", Orthop Clin North Am. Review, 35(1), pp.43~56 (2004)
- F.F. Buechel Sr, "Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacement", Clin. Orthop, 388, pp.41~50 (2001)
- S. D. Gertzbein, "Moire patterns: an accurate technique for determination of the locus of the centres of rotation", J. Biomech, 18, pp.501~509 (1985)
- B. Dahl, "Clinical outcome after spinal fusion with a rigid versus a semi-rigid pedicle screw system", Eur. Spine. J, 6, pp.412~416 (1997)