척추경나사못을 이용한 유합술과 동반 시술된 극돌기간 삽입기구의 생체역학적 연구
Biomechanical Analysis of a Combined Interspinous Spacer with a Posterior Lumbar Fusion with Pedicle Screws
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, during the multi-level fusion with pedicle screws, interspinous spacer are sometimes substituted for the most superior level of the fusion in an attempt to reduce the number of fusion level and likelihood of degeneration process at the adjacent level. In this study, a finite element (FE) study was performed to assess biomechanical efficacies of the interspinous spacer combined with posterior lumbar fusion with a previously-validated 3-dimensional FE model of the intact lumbar spine (L1-S1). The post-operative models were made by modifying the intact model to simulate the implantation of interspinous spacer and pedicle screws at the L3-4 and L4-5. Four different configurations of the post-op model were considered: (1) a normal spinal model; (2) Type 1, one-level fusion using posterior pedicle screws at the L4-5; (3) Type 2, two-level (L3-5) fusion; (4) Type 3, Type 1 plus CoflexTM at the L34. hybrid protocol (intact: 10 Nm) with a compressive follower load of 400N were used to flex, extend, axially rotate and laterally bend the FE model. As compared to the intact model, Type 2 showed the greatest increase in Range of motion (ROM) at the adjacent level (L2-3), followed Type 3, and Type 1 depending on the loading type. At L34, ROM of Type 2 was reduced by 34~56% regardless of loading mode, as compared to decrease of 55% in Type 3 only in extension. In case of normal bone strength model (Type 3_Normal), PVMS at the process and the pedicle remained less than 20% of their yield strengths regardless of loading, except in extension (about 35%). However, for the osteoporotic model (Type 3_Osteoporotic), it reached up to 56% in extension indicating increased susceptibility to fracture. This study suggested that substitution of the superior level fusion with the interspinous spacer in multi-level fusion may be able to offer similar biomechanical outcome and stability while reducing likelihood of adjacent level degeneration.
Abstract
Recently, during the multi-level fusion with pedicle screws, interspinous spacer are sometimes substituted for the most superior level of the fusion in an attempt to reduce the number of fusion level and likelihood of degeneration process at the adjacent level. In this study, a finite element (FE) study was performed to assess biomechanical efficacies of the interspinous spacer combined with posterior lumbar fusion with a previously-validated 3-dimensional FE model of the intact lumbar spine (L1-S1). The post-operative models were made by modifying the intact model to simulate the implantation of interspinous spacer and pedicle screws at the L3-4 and L4-5. Four different configurations of the post-op model were considered: (1) a normal spinal model; (2) Type 1, one-level fusion using posterior pedicle screws at the L4-5; (3) Type 2, two-level (L3-5) fusion; (4) Type 3, Type 1 plus CoflexTM at the L34. hybrid protocol (intact: 10 Nm) with a compressive follower load of 400N were used to flex, extend, axially rotate and laterally bend the FE model. As compared to the intact model, Type 2 showed the greatest increase in Range of motion (ROM) at the adjacent level (L2-3), followed Type 3, and Type 1 depending on the loading type. At L34, ROM of Type 2 was reduced by 34~56% regardless of loading mode, as compared to decrease of 55% in Type 3 only in extension. In case of normal bone strength model (Type 3_Normal), PVMS at the process and the pedicle remained less than 20% of their yield strengths regardless of loading, except in extension (about 35%). However, for the osteoporotic model (Type 3_Osteoporotic), it reached up to 56% in extension indicating increased susceptibility to fracture. This study suggested that substitution of the superior level fusion with the interspinous spacer in multi-level fusion may be able to offer similar biomechanical outcome and stability while reducing likelihood of adjacent level degeneration.
참고문헌 (21)
- A. S. Hilibrand, "Degenrative lumbar stenosis : Diagnosis and management", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 7(4), pp.239~249 (1999)
- I. Oda, "Biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar multi-segmental fixation", Spine, 25(18), pp.2303~2311 (2000)
- T. Akamura, "Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignment", Spine, 28, pp.1560~1566 (2003)
- D. H. Chow, "Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segment", Spine, 21, pp.549~555 (1996)
- 최우진, "퇴행성 요추부 질환에 대한 치료에서 척추 고정술과 동반된 인접부 극돌기간 기구 삽입술의 유용성에 대한 예비 보고", 대한척추신경외과학회지, 6(3), pp.149~155 (2009), 대한척추신경외과학회
- R. J. Crawford, "Surgical treatment of lumbar segment disease with interspinous implant : review", Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, 12(3), pp.153~167 (2009)
- 손권, "요추부 극돌기간 고정기구의 생체역학적 해석과 소형화 및 유연성 향상 설계", 대한기계학회논문집 A, 30(12), pp.1509~1517 (2006), 대한기계학회
- W. M. Chen, "In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement", Spine, 34(20), pp.716~723 (2009)
- Yeong-Hyeon Kim, "Biomechanical Efficacy of a Combined Interspinous Fusion System with a Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage", International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(5), pp.997~1001 (2015), 한국정밀공학회
- T. Zander, "Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination", Clinical Biomechanics, 16, pp.73~80 (2001)
- V. K. Goel, "Interlaminal shear stresses and laminae separation in a disk:Finite element analysis of the L-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads", Spine, 20, pp.689~698 (1995)
- S. A. Shirazi-Adl, "Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression a treedimensional nonlinear finite element study", Spine, 9, pp.120~134 (1984)
- M. Sharma, "Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability", Spine, 20, pp.887~900 (1995)
- T. H. Smit, "Structue and Function of Vertebral Trabecular bone", Spine, 22, pp.2823~2833 (1997)
- 안윤호, "Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System의 요추거동에 대한 생체역학적 분석", 의공학회지, 29(2), pp.139~145 (2008), 대한의용생체공학회
- Y. H. Kim, "Biomechanical Efficacies of an Interspinous Spacer combined with Posteiror Lumbar Fusion with Pedicle Screws", Orthopadic Research Society 2013 Anuual Meeting (2013)
- A. Polikeit, "The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite element analysis", Spine, 28, pp.991~996 (2003)
- M.M. Panjabi, "Roundtables in Spine Surgery; Spine Biomechanics", pp.45~58 (2008), Quality Medical Publishing
- 김영현, "유한요소 해석을 이용한 정형용 흉·요추 보조기의 형태에 따른 생체역학적 분석", 재활복지공학회논문지, 6(1), pp.45~50 (2012), 한국재활복지공학회[DOI]
- H. Lin, "Treatment of bisegmental lumbar spinal stenosis: Coflex interspinous implant versus bisegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion", Scientific Research and Essays, 6, pp.479~484 (2011)
- A. Kettler, "Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? a biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea", Clinical Biomechanics, 23, pp.242~247 (2008)