본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치매임상평가척도 박스총점(CDR-SB)에 따른 기억성 경도인지장애와 혈관성 경도인지장애의 MMSE, HDS-R 및MoCA 검사 반응 비교

A Comparison of the Performances on the MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA According to the CDR Sum of Boxes in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신경과학

초록

Background: O’Bryant et al. (2008) argued that the CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) can be used to distinguish MCI from very early dementia in patients with CDR-GS of 0.5. They reported that the optimal CDR-SB cut-off score was 2.5. The present study was conducted to examine whether the subgroups classified with CDR-SB scores showed the corresponding group differences on the cognitive tests. Methods: The subjects were 45 amnestic multi-domain MCI (amMCI) and 53 vascular MCI (VaMCI) with CDR-GS of 0.5. Each patient group was classified into “mild (0.5-2.0)” and “severe (2.5-4.0)” subgroups based on the CDR-SB. As the result, 4 groups were formed such as mild amMCI (n=23), severe amMCI (n=22), mild VaMCI (n=29), and severe VaMCI (n=24). The subjects were given the MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. The MANCOVA was conducted separately for each test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Severe groups of both amMCI and VaMCI showed significantly lower performances than two mild groups in MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. It was found that “serial 100-7” was a good item to discriminate between the mild and severe groups in both amMCI and VaMCI. Items measuring “orientation” or “naming” showed significant subgroup differences in the amMCI, whereas items related to “memory,” “visuospatial construction,” or “frontal/executive function” showed significant subgroup differences in the VaMCI. Conclusions: These results showed that there were significant differences in cognitive functions between the two subgroups with CDR-GS of 0.5. The results about the items discriminating between subgroups in amMCI and VaMCI were consistent with the previous findings about the progression of cognitive impairments in AD and VaD. Therefore, these results support the use of CDR-SB as a guideline for distinguishing MCI from early dementia.

Abstract

Background: O’Bryant et al. (2008) argued that the CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) can be used to distinguish MCI from very early dementia in patients with CDR-GS of 0.5. They reported that the optimal CDR-SB cut-off score was 2.5. The present study was conducted to examine whether the subgroups classified with CDR-SB scores showed the corresponding group differences on the cognitive tests. Methods: The subjects were 45 amnestic multi-domain MCI (amMCI) and 53 vascular MCI (VaMCI) with CDR-GS of 0.5. Each patient group was classified into “mild (0.5-2.0)” and “severe (2.5-4.0)” subgroups based on the CDR-SB. As the result, 4 groups were formed such as mild amMCI (n=23), severe amMCI (n=22), mild VaMCI (n=29), and severe VaMCI (n=24). The subjects were given the MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. The MANCOVA was conducted separately for each test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Severe groups of both amMCI and VaMCI showed significantly lower performances than two mild groups in MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. It was found that “serial 100-7” was a good item to discriminate between the mild and severe groups in both amMCI and VaMCI. Items measuring “orientation” or “naming” showed significant subgroup differences in the amMCI, whereas items related to “memory,” “visuospatial construction,” or “frontal/executive function” showed significant subgroup differences in the VaMCI. Conclusions: These results showed that there were significant differences in cognitive functions between the two subgroups with CDR-GS of 0.5. The results about the items discriminating between subgroups in amMCI and VaMCI were consistent with the previous findings about the progression of cognitive impairments in AD and VaD. Therefore, these results support the use of CDR-SB as a guideline for distinguishing MCI from early dementia.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Summers MJ, "Neuropsychological measures predict decline to Alzheimer’s dementia from Mild Cognitive Impairment", Neuropsychology, 26, pp.498~508 (2012)
  2. Wilson RS, "Cognitive decline in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment", Arch Neurol, 68, pp.351~356 (2011)
  3. Petersen RC, "Mild Cognitive Impairment as a diagnostic entity", J Int Neurology, 256, pp.183~194 (2004)
  4. Bowler JV, "Conceptual background to Vascular Cognitive Impairment", Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 13, pp.30~38 (1999)
  5. Alexopoulos P, "Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment", Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 22, pp.27~34 (2006)
  6. Gorelick PB, "Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia : A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association, 2011, pp.42, 2672~2713
  7. O’Bryant SE, "Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes scores", Arch Neurol, 65, pp.1091~1094 (2008)
  8. Hughes CP, "A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia", Br J Psychiatry, 140, pp.566~572 (1982)
  9. O’Bryant SE, "Validation of the new interpretive guidelines for the Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes score in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center database", Arch Neurol, 67, pp.746~749 (2010)
  10. Choi SH, "Interchanging scores between Clinical Dementia Rating scale and Global Deterioration Scale", Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 17, pp.98~105 (2003)
  11. Kang Y, "Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery" (2012), Human Brain Research & Consulting
  12. 강연욱, "K-MMSE(Korean-Mini Mental State Examination)의 노인 규준 연구", 한국심리학회지:일반, 25(2), pp.1~12 (2006), 한국심리학회
  13. 양동원, "한국어판 하세가와 치매척도 개정본의 신뢰도 및 타당도의 평가", 대한신경과학회지, 22(4), pp.315~321 (2004), 대한신경과학회
  14. 강연욱, "혈관성 인지장애 선별검사로서 Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment(K-MoCA)의 신뢰도, 타당도 및 규준 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), pp.549~562 (2009), 한국임상심리학회
  15. Folstein Mf, ""MINI-MENTAL STATE" : A Practical method for granding the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
  16. Imai Y, "The revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale(HDS-R)-evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia", J Hong Kong Coll Psychiatr, 4, pp.20~24 (1994)
  17. Nasreddine ZS, "The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment", J American Geriatr Soc, 53, pp.695~699 (2005)
  18. Peterson RC, "Mild Cognitive Impairment or questionable dementia?", Arch Neurol, 57, pp.643~644 (2000)
  19. Domoto-Reilly K, "Naming impairment in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with left anterior temporal lobe atrophy", J Neuroimage, 63, pp.348~355 (2012)
  20. O’Brien JT, "Vascular cognitive impairment", Lacent Neurol, 2, pp.89~98 (2003)
  21. Moorhouse P, "Vascular cognitive impairment : Current concepts and clinical developments", Lacent Neurol, 7, pp.246~255 (2008)
  22. Morris JC, "Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer’s disease", Arch Neurol, 58, pp.397~405 (2001)
  23. Wentzel C, "Progression of impairment in patients with vascular cognitive impairment without dementia", Neurology, 57, pp.714~716 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

초기 인지저하 단계에서 변화가 확인되는 신경심리영역김진현, 박수진, 이도엽, 하정희대한노인정신의학회 · 노인정신의학2021 · 제25권 제2호Effect of Education on Discriminability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Compared to Mini-Mental State ExaminationKang Yeonwook, Kim Byeong Chae, Kim Haeyoon, Park Jaesel, Yang Seonyeong, Yu Kyung-Ho대한치매학회 · Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)2023 · 제22권 제2호Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Index Scores: a Comparison with the Cognitive Domain Scores of the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB)강연욱, 유경호, Kim Byeong-Chae, Kim Haeyoon, Lee Byung-Chul대한치매학회 · Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)2021 · 제20권 제3호MoCA-CDIS를 활용한 경도인지장애 환자의치매 진행 예측력 평가나승희, 박종식, 송인욱, 정용안, 조현지, 지한솔한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2026 · 제31권 제1호인지기능검사에 기반한 중증 알츠하이머 치매와중증 혈관성 치매의 변별김용숙인지발달중재학회 · 인지발달중재학회지2025 · 제16권 제1호Association Between Executive Dysfunction-Related Activities of Daily Living Disability and Clinical Dementia Rating Domain Patterns in Patients With Vascular Dementia and Age-Matched Patients With Alzheimer’s Dementia박준혁, Byoung Sun Jun, Hyun Ju Yang, Kyung Min Kim대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2023 · 제20권 제12호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)