본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전쟁포로들의 저항과 반공오리엔탈리즘 ― 한국전쟁기 유엔군 포로수용소 내 사건들을 중심으로 ―

The resistance of the Prisoners of war and the Anti-communist Orientalism - Focused on the incidents in the UNC POW camps during the Korean War

김학재
수선사학회|2010.06|사림 (SARIM, The Historical Journal)|제36호|pp. 141-178

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

한국전쟁예외상태The Korean Warstate of exception포로수용소내전적 통치성반공오리엔탈리즘Prisoners of War Campgovernmentality of civil waranti-communist orientalism
주제분류역사학

초록

The POWs in the UNC POW camps had continuously resisted to the camps authorities, since the camp's policy was too oppressive and beneficial only to the U.S. at the Truce. The camp authority supressed POWs by force, and many bleeding incidents took placed. This paper attempted to uncover reality of these events, which was biased with the 'logic of behind' and 'anticommunist orientalism'. And also tried to trace how this 'logic of behind' was constructed by the UNC's public releases, press and incident reports. Finaly, this paper want to identify what is the character of the Governmentality of the UNC POW camps. Otherwise known as armed rebellion, most of resistants in the POW camps were not systemic and planed events. '6.18' incidents was caused by refusing food to take the initiative in the camps. And POWs at '8.15' incidents just sang a memorial song of liberation. POWs refused forced injection training, classification, ideological investigation of War criminals('9.15', and '2.18' incidents). After the Pongam island incident, the 'logic of behind' was completed. This logic was constituted of images that inner/outer enemys were connected each other and justified of physical removal of communist POWs by attaching 'commy' and 'oriental communist' stigma to them. The 'Oriental communist' concept was a racism combined with anticommunism. The POW camps were 'dominating military orginization' which showed overwhelming force if POWs didn't accept camps policy and direction. This paper suggest to call this character of camp's policy and method to respond to these incidents as 'governmentality of Civil War'.

Abstract

The POWs in the UNC POW camps had continuously resisted to the camps authorities, since the camp's policy was too oppressive and beneficial only to the U.S. at the Truce. The camp authority supressed POWs by force, and many bleeding incidents took placed. This paper attempted to uncover reality of these events, which was biased with the 'logic of behind' and 'anticommunist orientalism'. And also tried to trace how this 'logic of behind' was constructed by the UNC's public releases, press and incident reports. Finaly, this paper want to identify what is the character of the Governmentality of the UNC POW camps. Otherwise known as armed rebellion, most of resistants in the POW camps were not systemic and planed events. '6.18' incidents was caused by refusing food to take the initiative in the camps. And POWs at '8.15' incidents just sang a memorial song of liberation. POWs refused forced injection training, classification, ideological investigation of War criminals('9.15', and '2.18' incidents). After the Pongam island incident, the 'logic of behind' was completed. This logic was constituted of images that inner/outer enemys were connected each other and justified of physical removal of communist POWs by attaching 'commy' and 'oriental communist' stigma to them. The 'Oriental communist' concept was a racism combined with anticommunism. The POW camps were 'dominating military orginization' which showed overwhelming force if POWs didn't accept camps policy and direction. This paper suggest to call this character of camp's policy and method to respond to these incidents as 'governmentality of Civil War'.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Walter G. Hermes, "Truce Tent and Fighting front (Washington D.C", Office of the chief of military History United States Army, ~ (1966)
  2. "진압과 석방의 정치 : 한국전쟁기 포로수용소와 국민형성", 제노사이드연구, 6, pp.47~55 (2009)
  3. Headquarters UN, "The Communist War in POW Camps- The background of Incidents among Communist Prisoners in Korea(이하 The Communist War)", 35~38 (1953)
  4. "('Conclusions') NARA RG 550 Entry A1-1 Organizational History Box 87", ~
  5. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States(이하 FRUS) 1952-1954", 15, pp.369~370 (1954)
  6. "한국전란 3년지", 국방부정훈국 전사편찬회, C14~16 (1954)
  7. 김행복, "한국전쟁의 포로", 국방군사연구소, 111~135 (1996)
  8. 김득중, "죽엄으로써 나라를 지키자" (2007), 선인
  9. 김득중, "빨갱이의 탄생" (2009), 선인
  10. 박태순, "거제도의 6ㆍ25 그 전쟁범죄", 사회와 사상, 10 (1989)
  11. 오연호, "특별포로수용소 용초도", 월간말, 51 (1990)
  12. 전갑생, "'거제도 포로수용소 설치와 포로의 저항'", 제노사이드연구, 2 (2007)
  13. Dean. Mitchell, "Governmentality - Power and Rule in Modern Society", pp.1~26 (1999), Sage Publications
  14. 조르조 아감벤, "예외상태", pp.99~101 (2009), 새물결
  15. HQ US Army, Pacific, "The Handling of Prisoners of War during the Korean War", 12~14 (1960)
  16. "NARA, RG 389, Records of the Office of the Provost Marshal General, Series 452 B, Records of the Prisoners of war Division. Box 88", ~
  17. "The Handling of POWs", 15~16
  18. HQ, POW Command, "A Study of the Administration and Security of the Oriental Communist Prisoner of War during the Conflict in Korea", 13~19 (1953)
  19. "NARA, RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1660", ~
  20. "The Administration", Ι, pp.21~22
  21. Report of the central committee of the United democratic fatherland front of Korea on Atrocities Committed by the American aggressors against captured officers and men if the korean people's arm, , 15~ (1953)
  22. "NARA, RG 59 Entry A1-205-KA Central Decimal Files 1950-1954, Box 2887(노근리 파일 수집번호 : 9123-00-00996)", ~ (1954)
  23. 조성훈, "한국전쟁중 유엔군의 포로정책 연구", 박사, pp.1998
  24. Report on atrocities, , 12~13
  25. "Disturbance at United Nations Prisoner of War Camp #1(1951.9.27.)(section 8C-1)", 1~ (1951)
  26. "NARA RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1653", ~
  27. "Disturbance at United Nations Prisoner of War Camp #1", 4~
  28. Collection and Documentation of Material relating to the Prisoner of war interment program in Korea,1950-1953, , 7~8, pp.Report of the Military Police Board No. 53-4 (1957)
  29. "NARA RG 389 Provost Marshal Entry 1A Box 18, Box 19", ~
  30. Report of Incident(1952. 2. 24.)(section 8C-5), , 1~3 (1952)
  31. "NARA RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1653", ~
  32. "The Handling of POWs", ~
  33. "경향신문, 1952. 2. 26", ~ (1952)
  34. "민주신보, 1952. 2. 28", ~ (1952)
  35. "경향신문, 1952. 2. 28", ~ (1952)
  36. Ron Robin, "The Making of the Cold war enemy", pp.159~160 (2001), Princeton University Press
  37. Karl W. Gustafson, "The Korean Second Front - Prisoners of War", US Army War College, Student thesis, 43~ (1963)
  38. "The Administration, Vol. Ⅱ", ~
  39. "UNC PW Camp 3a - 1 October 1952(1952.10.1.)(section 8C-17)", 1~ (1952)
  40. "NARA RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1653", ~
  41. "Cite AX 71709. From CG KComZ to CINCUNC(1952.12.17),(Tab 138), NARA RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1650", ~ (1952)
  42. "Memorandum for the Record(1952.12.18)(Tab 397), RG 338 E A1 224 8th Army Enemy Prisoners of War Records Box 1651", ~ (1952)
  43. "동아일보, 1952. 12. 17", ~ (1952)
  44. "민주신보, 1952. 12. 18", ~ (1952)
  45. "The Communist War", 35~38
  46. "Deceased Prisoners of War, NARA RG 389 E 433 box 221(노근리 파일 수집번호 9123-00-00984)", ~
  47. 슬라보예 지젝, "잃어버린 대의를 옹호하며", pp.423~455 (2009), 그린비

관련 논문AI추천

한국전쟁 포로와 사진: ‘동양공산주의자’ 인종 프레임과 폭력성 재현전갑생이화사학연구소 · 이화사학연구2018 · 제56호은유로서의 포로 : 수용소의 삶과 ‘적/ 동지’의 구별 정치 - 한국전쟁 포로들의 UN군 관리 수용소 체험을 중심으로 -장세진상허학회 · 상허학보2016 · 제46권 전후 ‘반공포로’의 탄생과 남한 정착의 실상이선우수선사학회 · 사림2024 · 제88호유엔군의 포로 정책: ‘석방’과 ‘송환’을 중심으로김보영이화사학연구소 · 이화사학연구2013 · 제46호한국전쟁기 공산군의 유엔군 포로 관리와 성격나상철육군군사연구소 · 군사연구2019 · 제148호‘포로’라는 이념: 한국전쟁 ‘포로서사’와 ‘자기구성’의 가능성임세화상허학회 · 상허학보2016 · 제46권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

한국전쟁 전후 민간인집단학살의 연구 방향서중석pp. 1-20한국전쟁 전후 육군 방첩대(CIC)의 조직과 활동김득중pp. 21-62한국전쟁 전 정치범 양산 ‘법계열’의 운용과 정치범 인식의 변화강성현pp. 63-100한국전쟁기 부역자 처벌이임하pp. 101-1401920-30년대 새로운 ‘동학농민전쟁상’의 형성배항섭pp. 179-208
원문 보기