檀君神話 小考
Characteristics of Thinking Structure in the Legend of Tan-gun
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Myth is a creative work based on archaic thinking. In the world of myth, which is dominated by archaic thinking, the animals and plants all have their own thinking, consciousness and social lives as same as human. There are not only communications among them, but also concern marriage sometimes. So does the legend of Tan-gun. Undeniably, there are so many external influence mixed into the legend, such as Taoism, Buddhism and Confucianism (the action of asking for permission by Huan Xiong to his father, Huan Yin, to go to the man’s world, can be explained by the filial consciousness in Confucianism, e.g.). That shows the legend of Tan-gun has been changed for many times when it passed on as an existing writings. Neglecting the external influence, we can still experience a scene that in the primitive tribe, the Tan-gun or Kojosons sat around, listening to the ancestor stories about mating with animals, monstrousness of snake or dragon, the power of tiger or leopard, auspicious sign of phoenix, and the heaven and earth opened up from the chaos. Compared to the comic spirit of Greek mythology, the Korean and Chinese mythology are more similar in the mood of serious and solemn. Sometimes, the serious mood may be even depressed, and the solemn may be oppressive, while full of introversive hardship and rational reflective thought. The suffering process of transforming from bears to human and the process of birth because of the marriage between gods and bears are seemingly to represent the difficult process of transition from uncivilized condition to civilization of human society. We can find out the backward and introspection on the whole civilizing process from fear to gods, respect to ancestors and sacrifice to the legend of mountains or trees. Therefore, it can be said that as the first ideology came into existence after human language, the deep structure of mythology reflected the early culture of the nationality. Also it will deposit on the under stratum of the national spirit to transform to a kind of automaticity collective unconsciousness which affected the whole development process of culture deeply. Taken in this sense, the research on legend of Tan-gun is also the research on the innermost structure of national psychology, culture and history of the Hankyoreh, on the exploration and searching about the roots of Korean Peninsula Culture.
Abstract
Myth is a creative work based on archaic thinking. In the world of myth, which is dominated by archaic thinking, the animals and plants all have their own thinking, consciousness and social lives as same as human. There are not only communications among them, but also concern marriage sometimes. So does the legend of Tan-gun. Undeniably, there are so many external influence mixed into the legend, such as Taoism, Buddhism and Confucianism (the action of asking for permission by Huan Xiong to his father, Huan Yin, to go to the man’s world, can be explained by the filial consciousness in Confucianism, e.g.). That shows the legend of Tan-gun has been changed for many times when it passed on as an existing writings. Neglecting the external influence, we can still experience a scene that in the primitive tribe, the Tan-gun or Kojosons sat around, listening to the ancestor stories about mating with animals, monstrousness of snake or dragon, the power of tiger or leopard, auspicious sign of phoenix, and the heaven and earth opened up from the chaos. Compared to the comic spirit of Greek mythology, the Korean and Chinese mythology are more similar in the mood of serious and solemn. Sometimes, the serious mood may be even depressed, and the solemn may be oppressive, while full of introversive hardship and rational reflective thought. The suffering process of transforming from bears to human and the process of birth because of the marriage between gods and bears are seemingly to represent the difficult process of transition from uncivilized condition to civilization of human society. We can find out the backward and introspection on the whole civilizing process from fear to gods, respect to ancestors and sacrifice to the legend of mountains or trees. Therefore, it can be said that as the first ideology came into existence after human language, the deep structure of mythology reflected the early culture of the nationality. Also it will deposit on the under stratum of the national spirit to transform to a kind of automaticity collective unconsciousness which affected the whole development process of culture deeply. Taken in this sense, the research on legend of Tan-gun is also the research on the innermost structure of national psychology, culture and history of the Hankyoreh, on the exploration and searching about the roots of Korean Peninsula Culture.
참고문헌 (49)
- "中國神話學文論選萃 下篇" (1994), 中國廣播電視出版社
- 여사면, "맥족고「주몽신화」" (1934), 중산문화교육관계간
- 동아시아민족탄생전설연구 중국문화교육관계간, "손작운", ~ (1934)
- 장일설, "殷商拓地朝鮮考「河伯神話」", 東方雜誌 (1945)
- 왕치손, "箕子朝鮮考「朱蒙神話", 學原, ~ (1947)
- 장경화, "燕趙文化" (1995), 요녕교육출판사
- 조중병, "고조선개국신화고, In 한국학논문집 제8집" (2008), 민족출판사
- 小田省吾, "조선상세사, In 조선사강좌일반사 漢城, 1923-24", pp.37~
- 윤경수, "圖解韓國神話和古典文化的原型象徵性", pp.11~15 (1997), 太學社
- 安鼎福, "東史綱目", ~
- 김성환, "일제강점기 「檀君陵記蹟碑」의 건립과 단군전승", 사학연구, (86), pp.171~209 (2007), 한국사학회
- 김성환, "일제강점기 단군릉수축운동의 전개", 대동문화연구, (67), pp.479~544 (2009), 대동문화연구원
- 박광용, "북한 학계의 단군 인식과 ‘단군릉’발굴", 역사비평, 52, pp.158~198 (2000)
- 임재해, "단군신화로 본 고조선 문화의 기원 재인식", 고조선단군학, 19(19), pp.277~372 (2008), 고조선단군학회
- 최일례, "고구려인의 관념에 보이는 단군신화의 투영 맥락 : 비류부의 정치적 위상을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2010
- 윤경수, "단군신화의 신화성과역사인식", 단군학연구, (2), pp.51~76 (2000)
- 백미나, "檀君神話에 나타난 역사 기술의 구현 양상 연구", 한민족문화연구, (24), pp.85~108 (2008), 한민족문화학회
- 홍순애, "근대계몽기 단군신화 담론의 서사적 재현 - 박은식을 중심으로 -", 한민족문화연구, 28(28), pp.197~225 (2009), 한민족문화학회
- 서영대, "단군신화의 의미와 기능, In 단군과 고조선" (2000), 사계절
- 임재해, "단군신화에 갈무리된 문화적 원형과 민족문화의 정체성", 고조선단군학, 16, pp.275~350 (2007), 고조선단군학회
- 조현설, "근대계몽기 단군 신화의 탈신화화와 재신화화", 민족문학사연구, (32), pp.10~32 (2006), 민족문학사학회
- 방석종, "단군설화의 역사비평적 해석 - 신관을 중심으로 -", 고조선단군학, 10, pp.173~204 (2004), 고조선단군학회
- 이찬구, "단군신화의 재해석", 고조선단군학, 17, pp.329~364 (2007), 고조선단군학회
- 의 實體, "한국사연구", 2002, 1~34, pp.한국사연구회
- 이현중, "正易 의 觀點에서 본 檀君神話의 時間觀", 동아시아고대학, (16), pp.49~78 (2007), 동아시아고대학회
- 이은봉, "단군신화 연구의 경향과 과제:종교적 측면에서", 단군학연구, (1), pp.265~287 (1999)
- 최남선, "불함문화론", 조선 및 조선민족, ~ (1928)
- 백남운, "조선사회 경제사" (1937)
- 김재원, "단군신화의 새로운 연구" (1977), 탐구당
- 천관우, "한국상고사의 쟁점" (1975), 일조각
- 전호태, "고구려 고분 벽화와 신선신앙", ~
- 野崎充彦, "도교와 조선문학", ~
- 국제 일본문화연구회, "도교와 동아시아 문화"
- "三國遺事", ~
- 廣開土王陵碑序語, "滿洲國安東省集安縣高句麗遺跡", 27~ (1936)
- "後漢書", ~
- Chewon Kim, "HanDynasty Mythology and Korean Legend of Tan-gun", Archives of the Chinese Art Society of America, 3 (1948)
- 유명서, "武梁祠後石室所見黃帝蚩尤戰圖考" (1941), 中國文化硏究彙刊
- 水野淸一, "漢的蚩尤伎--武氏祠畵像的解, In 創立 二十五周年紀念論文集" (1954)
- Cheng Te-k′un, , Oriental Art New Series, 4(2) (1958)
- 馬名超, "鄂溫克族民間文學概況", ~
- 고덕명, "중국소수민족신화선", ~
- 파트르, "麥德爾娘娘創始", 民間文學, 3 (1986)
- 阿布都拉, "維吾爾族女天神創世神話試析", 民間文學, 9 (1985)
- 陶陽, "中國創世神話, In 中國文化史叢書" (1989), 上海人民出版社
- 鄧啟耀, "中國神話的思維結構", pp.44~45 (1992), 重慶出版社
- 李奎報, "東明王篇", ~
- 茅盾, "神話研究" (1981), 百花文藝出版社
- 張光直, "中國創世神話 之分析與古史研究 第8冊" (1959), 民族學研究所
