본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국의 ‘푸쓰녠傅斯年’연구의 지적 네트워크와 그 함의

The Intellectual Network of Major Researches on Fu Sinian傅斯年 in China and Its Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In this paper, I applied the WNET metric analysis program to visualize the intellectual structure and network of the FuSinian study and analyze its implications. Since the major researchers group were highly productive as well as influential within the researchers, the data were extracted from the researches of the major researchers. As the main keywords, I paid attention to the structure and network of knowledge. As a result, I verified that Gu Jiegang顾颉刚,1893-1980) and Chen Yinke (陈寅恪,1890-1969) showed the highest TBC, and the main researches on Fu which were focused on his thought of historiography and his scholarly works were being closely linked. Whereas researches related to FuSinian were generally focused on the relationship between FuSinian and other intellectuals in the period of ROC, but not on his political activities or classics studies. Secondly, keyword, Liu Yizheng(柳诒徵) showed the highest NNC, and formed an important structure in FuSs-nien study. When I analyzed the extracted data in terms of the relationship between the authors, ⑦ group's Luo Zhitian(罗志田Sichuan四川 University History Department) showed the highest TBC, and Sang Bing(桑兵) was the most influential within the main research group, While Luo Zhitian reviewed FuSinian from the perspective of ideological history, Sang Bing concentrated on FuSinian’s works from the historiography of modern history. Both of them took FuSinian’s anti-traditional tendency into consideration, but, at the same time they tried to appreciate FuSinian’s cultural awareness or his patriotism though Fu insisted on anti-traditional changes through the Westernized method. These nationalistic studies were connected with the interest in Fu’s activities in History of the Northeast(东北史纲) and National People's Congress(国民参政会) as well as in his activities during the anti-Japanese period. However, researches on his “Scientism” were not the mainstream study except for the researches on the relevance with the Quellenkunde school. Additionally, the study by ZhangQing(章淸) which revealed the liberal aspect of FuSinian through his journal activities, despite the highest frequency of quotations was not related to mainstream research group.

Abstract

In this paper, I applied the WNET metric analysis program to visualize the intellectual structure and network of the FuSinian study and analyze its implications. Since the major researchers group were highly productive as well as influential within the researchers, the data were extracted from the researches of the major researchers. As the main keywords, I paid attention to the structure and network of knowledge. As a result, I verified that Gu Jiegang顾颉刚,1893-1980) and Chen Yinke (陈寅恪,1890-1969) showed the highest TBC, and the main researches on Fu which were focused on his thought of historiography and his scholarly works were being closely linked. Whereas researches related to FuSinian were generally focused on the relationship between FuSinian and other intellectuals in the period of ROC, but not on his political activities or classics studies. Secondly, keyword, Liu Yizheng(柳诒徵) showed the highest NNC, and formed an important structure in FuSs-nien study. When I analyzed the extracted data in terms of the relationship between the authors, ⑦ group's Luo Zhitian(罗志田Sichuan四川 University History Department) showed the highest TBC, and Sang Bing(桑兵) was the most influential within the main research group, While Luo Zhitian reviewed FuSinian from the perspective of ideological history, Sang Bing concentrated on FuSinian’s works from the historiography of modern history. Both of them took FuSinian’s anti-traditional tendency into consideration, but, at the same time they tried to appreciate FuSinian’s cultural awareness or his patriotism though Fu insisted on anti-traditional changes through the Westernized method. These nationalistic studies were connected with the interest in Fu’s activities in History of the Northeast(东北史纲) and National People's Congress(国民参政会) as well as in his activities during the anti-Japanese period. However, researches on his “Scientism” were not the mainstream study except for the researches on the relevance with the Quellenkunde school. Additionally, the study by ZhangQing(章淸) which revealed the liberal aspect of FuSinian through his journal activities, despite the highest frequency of quotations was not related to mainstream research group.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 欧阳哲生, "傅斯年全集 全7卷" (2000), 湖南敎育出版社
  2. 馬亮寬, "傅斯年-時代的曙光" (2013), 五南圖書出版股份有限公司
  3. 王汎森, "傅斯年遗札 全 3卷" (2015), 社会科学文献出版社
  4. 王汎森, "傅斯年:中国近代歷史与政治中的个体生命" (2012), 生活ㆍ读书ㆍ新知三联书店
  5. 김창규, "傅斯年(1896~1950)과 ‘書生報國’", 역사학연구, (22), pp.309~338 (2004), 호남사학회
  6. 김판준, "연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구", 정보관리학회지, 24(4), pp.285~303 (2007), 한국정보관리학회
  7. 이재윤, "지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구", 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), pp.333~355 (2006), 한국문헌정보학회
  8. 차태근, "중국 근대 지식권력과 “학계(學界)”의 형성", 중국학논총, (40), pp.123~151 (2013), 중국학연구소
  9. 최은진, "중국의 ‘중국학’연구의 지적구조와 네트워크: 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 활용한 새로운 분석방법의 모색", 한국동북아논총, 21(2), pp.67~88 (2016), 한국동북아학회
  10. 葛兆光, "《新史学》之后——1929年的中国历史学界", 历史研究, (1) (2003)
  11. 江心力, "傅斯年"史学只是史料学"思想辨析", 史学史硏究, (3) (1996)
  12. 杜正胜, "从疑古到重建──傅斯年的史学革命及其与胡适、顾颉刚的关系", 中国文化, (12) (1995)
  13. 罗志田, "国学不是学:西方学术分类与民初国学定位的困惑", 社会科学研究, (1) (2002)
  14. 罗志田, "知人论世:陈寅恪、傅斯年的史学与现代中国", 读书, (6) (2008)
  15. 谢桃坊, "致中国历史语言之学于自然科学之境界中——论傅斯年与历史语言学派在国学运动中的意义", 社会科学战缐 (2014)
  16. 桑兵, "近代学术转承:从国学到东方学——傅斯年 『历史语言研究所工作之旨趣』 解析", 历史研究, (3) (2001)
  17. 桑兵, "傅斯年“史学只是史料学”再析", 近代史硏究, (5) (2007)
  18. 石兴泽, "学、政两界人的交往和友谊——傅斯年与王世杰", 聊城大学学报, (2) (2005)
  19. 苏全有, "对傅斯年史学思想硏究的回顾与反思", 聊城大学学报, (4) (2010)
  20. 王汎森, "傅斯年早期的"造社会", 中国文化 (1996)
  21. 王凤青, "试论傅斯年对"国学"概念认识的演变过程", 忻州师范学院学报, (1) (2008)
  22. 王晴佳, "学潮与教授 : 抗战前后政治与学术互动的一个考察", 歷史硏究, (4) (2005)
  23. 王学典, "欧洲汉学与美国中国学对峙下的民国史学界", 中国图书评论, (5) (2007)
  24. 张京华, "疑古、考古与中国现代学术走向——以傅斯年对古史辨派态度的转变为中心", 新视野, (1) (2007)
  25. 章淸, "“学术社会”的建构与知识分子的“权势网络”——《独立评论》群体及其角色与身份", 歷史硏究, (4) (2002)
  26. 张太塬, "发现史料之外的历史——以傅斯年研究为例", 近代史硏究, (2) (2010)
  27. 周文玖, "关于"中华民族是一个"学术论辩的考察", 民族研究, (3) (2007)
  28. 周勇, "重写现代中国的西学东渐", 中国图书评论, (5) (2014)
  29. 彭明辉, "现代中国南方学术网络的初始(1911-1945)", 国立政治大学歷史学报, (29) (2008)
  30. 何兹全, "傅斯年的史学思想和史学着作", 历史研究, (4) (2000)
  31. 欧阳哲生, "傅斯年的“国学”观", 光明日报, ~ (2008)
  32. 马亮宽, "傅斯年与 『民族与古代中国史』", 光明日报, ~ (2007)
  33. "中国知网"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)