우리들의 자화상 : 최근 한국의 중국 근현대사 연구
A Mapping of South Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is a critical sketch of modern Chinese historical scholarship as practiced by South Korean historians, including myself. Drawing an intellectual topography of modern Chinese history in Korea today could help illuminate the way toward a vision of future South Korean historiography. I wish to note the following points in this paper. Firstly, I consider the political democratization of Korean society. Secondly, the generation gap. Thirdly, the research environment needs to be considered. The institution and the changing circumstances of universities cannot but affect the study of the historian in any way. Distinguishing ‘progress’ from ‘non-progress’ no longer produces meaningful results in modern Chinese scholarship. Rather, self-reflection on the study itself would be more significant. Korean researchers of modern Chinese history kept a distance from the ideological turmoil in Korea in the 1990s. They/We was afraid of being actively involved in the changing realities. They/We was negligent in deliberating on essential issues. I would like to attribute one of the reasons to the “standard research model," developed by the second- and third-generation scholars. This style of writing, which consists of explicating the significance of the research theme, examining precedent researches, discovering and reorganizing facts, and making a conclusion, is not the one and only possible format of a paper. This kind of standard research model will inevitably lead to disciplined writing regardless of the author's intention. With these problems in mind, researchers are required to make an effort to overcome the cycle of production and consumption in a research group itself. We should mention the ideologies and biases, as well as our research objectives in the paper in order to identify ourselves as much as possible. We also need to relativize our own argument and to be critical in using academic terms.
Abstract
This paper is a critical sketch of modern Chinese historical scholarship as practiced by South Korean historians, including myself. Drawing an intellectual topography of modern Chinese history in Korea today could help illuminate the way toward a vision of future South Korean historiography. I wish to note the following points in this paper. Firstly, I consider the political democratization of Korean society. Secondly, the generation gap. Thirdly, the research environment needs to be considered. The institution and the changing circumstances of universities cannot but affect the study of the historian in any way. Distinguishing ‘progress’ from ‘non-progress’ no longer produces meaningful results in modern Chinese scholarship. Rather, self-reflection on the study itself would be more significant. Korean researchers of modern Chinese history kept a distance from the ideological turmoil in Korea in the 1990s. They/We was afraid of being actively involved in the changing realities. They/We was negligent in deliberating on essential issues. I would like to attribute one of the reasons to the “standard research model," developed by the second- and third-generation scholars. This style of writing, which consists of explicating the significance of the research theme, examining precedent researches, discovering and reorganizing facts, and making a conclusion, is not the one and only possible format of a paper. This kind of standard research model will inevitably lead to disciplined writing regardless of the author's intention. With these problems in mind, researchers are required to make an effort to overcome the cycle of production and consumption in a research group itself. We should mention the ideologies and biases, as well as our research objectives in the paper in order to identify ourselves as much as possible. We also need to relativize our own argument and to be critical in using academic terms.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강명희, "近現代 中國의 국가건설과 제3의 길 : 非資本主義의 이론과 실천" (2003), 서울대학교출판부
- 강진아, "1930년대 중국의 중앙 지방 상인" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
- 김종엽, "김종엽", 창작과비평, (여름)통권 : 136 (2007)
- 김지환, "중국국민정부의 공업정책" (2005), 신서원
- 김창규, "세기초 중국의 민주정치론 연구" (2004), 경인문화사
- 김형종, "청말 신정기의 연구-강소성의 신정과 신사층" (2002), 서울대학교 출판부
- 김희교, "한국의 비판적 중국담론, 그 실종의 역사", 역사비평, (겨울) (2010)
- 박강, "중일전쟁과 아편" (1995), 지식산업사
- 박상수, "중국혁명과 비밀결사" (2006), 심산
- 박원호, "총설", 역사학보, 159 (1998)
- 박자영, "동아시아에서 사회주의 인민의 표상 정치", 중국어문학논집, (47), pp.335~355 (2007), 중국어문학연구회
- 박자영, "상하이 노스텔지어", 중국현대문학, 30(30), pp.91~122 (2004), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 배경한, "민두기선생의 중국근현대사 연구와 그 계승 방향", 중국현대사연구, 9 (2000), 중국현대사학회
- 배경한, "장개석연구-국민혁명시기 군사정치적 대두과정" (1995), 일조각
- 백영서, "서평: 민두기 저,“중국에서의 자유주의의 실험”", 중국현대사연구, 2 (1996), 중국현대사학회
- 백영서, "韓國の中國認識と中國硏究", 20世紀中國史4：現代中國と歷史學 (2009), 東京大學出版會
- 백영서, "중국현대대학문화연구-1920년대 대학성의 정체성 위기와 사회변혁" (1994), 일조각
- 손승회, "근대중국의 토비세계" (2008), 창비
- 신광현, "대학담론으로서의 논문", 사회비평, 14 (1996)
- 신승하, "중국당대 40년사" (1993), 고려원
- 신채식, "총설", 역사학보, 144 (1994)
- 안병직, "포스트모더니즘 역사론을 위한 변론", 역사비평, (봄)통권 : 58 (2002)
- 오금성, "총설", 역사학보, 156 (1997)
- "제도적 합리성’에 감춰진 ‘학문의 수렁’", 오창은[URL]
- 유용태, "지식청년과 농민사회의 혁명:1920년대 중국 중남부 3성의 비교연구" (2004), 문학과 지성사
- 유장근, "근대중국의 비밀결사" (1996), 고려원
- 윤건차, "현대한국의 사상흐름:지식인과 그 사상 1980~90년대" (2000), 당대
- 윤혜영, "중국현대사연구-북벌전야 북경정부의 내부적 붕괴과정(1923-1925)" (1992), 일조각
- 윤휘탁, "일제하 만주국연구-항일무장투쟁과 치안숙정공작" (1996), 일조각
- 이병인, "근대상해의 민간단체와 국가" (2006), 창비
- 이원석, "근대중국의 국학과 혁명사상" (2002), 국학자료원
- 이은자, "의화단운동 전후의 산동" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
- 이재령, "현대중국과 지식인" (2003), 신서원
- 이진경, "진보개념의 경계:근대적 진보개념을 넘어서", 문화과학, (16) (1998)
- 임상범, "현대중국의 출발-국민혁명기(1920-27)북경지역 중국공산당의 조직과 활동" (2000), 일조각
- 金 秀 英, "書評: 두 중국의 기원 -현대 중국의 토대가 된 삼민주의와 국민혁명(서해문집, 2005)", 중국사연구, (41), pp.421~431 (2006), 중국사학회
- 전인갑, "20세기전반기 상해사회의 지역주의와 노동자" (2002), 서울대학교출판부
- 정문상, "중국의 국민혁명과 상해학생운동" (2004), 혜안
- 조병한, "발간사", 동아시아역사연구, 1 (1996)
- 차경애, "의화단운동과 제국주의 열강" (1997), 유영사
- 차혜영, "지식의 최전선-'풍속-문화론 연구'에 대한 비판적 검토", 민족문학사연구, 33(33), pp.83~109 (2007), 민족문학사학회
- 천성림, "근대중국 사상세계의 한 흐름" (2002), 신서원
- 최장집, "민주주의의 민주화" (2006), 휴마니타스
- 최진규, "太平天國의 宗敎思想" (2002), 조선대학교출판부
- 황원구, "총설", 역사학보, 120 (1988)