동도서기론의 구조와 전개양상
Structure and Development of Dongdo-Seogi Philosophies
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For approximately 30 years after the opening of the port in 1876, Western civilization was genuinely flooding and it was also when the order of inner Joseon dynasty and East Asia surrounding Joseon was collapsing with transition to capitalist system or modern nations. Also, that period was a huge shift of civilization where Western civilization was substituting ‘Oriental Civilization’ that has bases on Confucianism by prevailing them. Throughout the process, various independent plans from various influential people were sought with different ways by the Joseon society to deal with the Western civilization. One of the theories that intellectuals with traditional reasoning based on Confucianism came up with to respond to Western civilization was Dongdo-Seogi Philosophies. It was the philosophy of accepting Seogi, the Western techniques and equipment that had Dongdo, which includes ideas, values, culture and customs of tradition, as its ‘model’. Also, Dongdo-Seogi philosophies had important meanings as the policy which provided logical reasons when Joseon dynasty government was pushing ahead the enlightenment policy after the opening of the port. Moreover, it has internal attitudes or awareness of not only the Oriental civilization that had privileged status of ‘universalism’ but also the Western civilization as well as the agony of ways to accept and adjust to the relationship of the both. In this essay, based on the research until now, Dongdo-Seogi Philosophies from 1880 to1984, when the acceptance of Western civilization or enlightenment policy with Dongdo as the ‘model’ was losing its meaning, will be studied. Also, the meaning and the idea of transition of the Dongdo-Seogi Philosophers within the controversy of ‘New school and old school’ will be approached from the context of realization of the relationship between the Oriental civilization and the Western civilization. Rather than exploring how modern Dongdo-Seogi Philosophy was, the focus will be on the concerns that people had that time to deal with prevailing Western civilization, what possibilities were there to aim as both civilizations were revitalized, and if there were, where the attainment would have been. Through this process, possibilities to newly understand the Dongdo-Seogi Philosophy will be looked at.
Abstract
For approximately 30 years after the opening of the port in 1876, Western civilization was genuinely flooding and it was also when the order of inner Joseon dynasty and East Asia surrounding Joseon was collapsing with transition to capitalist system or modern nations. Also, that period was a huge shift of civilization where Western civilization was substituting ‘Oriental Civilization’ that has bases on Confucianism by prevailing them. Throughout the process, various independent plans from various influential people were sought with different ways by the Joseon society to deal with the Western civilization. One of the theories that intellectuals with traditional reasoning based on Confucianism came up with to respond to Western civilization was Dongdo-Seogi Philosophies. It was the philosophy of accepting Seogi, the Western techniques and equipment that had Dongdo, which includes ideas, values, culture and customs of tradition, as its ‘model’. Also, Dongdo-Seogi philosophies had important meanings as the policy which provided logical reasons when Joseon dynasty government was pushing ahead the enlightenment policy after the opening of the port. Moreover, it has internal attitudes or awareness of not only the Oriental civilization that had privileged status of ‘universalism’ but also the Western civilization as well as the agony of ways to accept and adjust to the relationship of the both. In this essay, based on the research until now, Dongdo-Seogi Philosophies from 1880 to1984, when the acceptance of Western civilization or enlightenment policy with Dongdo as the ‘model’ was losing its meaning, will be studied. Also, the meaning and the idea of transition of the Dongdo-Seogi Philosophers within the controversy of ‘New school and old school’ will be approached from the context of realization of the relationship between the Oriental civilization and the Western civilization. Rather than exploring how modern Dongdo-Seogi Philosophy was, the focus will be on the concerns that people had that time to deal with prevailing Western civilization, what possibilities were there to aim as both civilizations were revitalized, and if there were, where the attainment would have been. Through this process, possibilities to newly understand the Dongdo-Seogi Philosophy will be looked at.
참고문헌 (69)
- 김문용, "동도서기론은 얼마나 유효한가?, In 가치청바지-동서양의 가치는 화해할 수 있을까?" (2007), 웅진
- 강만길, "동도서기론이란 무엇인가?", 마당, 9 (1982)
- 權五榮, "申箕善의 東道西器論硏究", 淸溪史學, 1 (1984)
- 백승종, "宜田記述을 통해서 본 陸用鼎의 개화사상", 동아연구, 18 (1989)
- 권오영, "東道西器論의 構造와 그 展開, In 한국사시민강좌 7" (1990), 일조각
- 김문용, "동도서기론의 논리와 전개, In 한국근대 개화사상과 개화운동" (1998), 신서원
- 민회수, "1880년대 육용정(1843-1917)의 현실인식과 동도서기론", 한국사론, 48 (2002), 서울대
- 김문용, "1880년대 후반기 동도서기적 개화론의 一端에 대한 검토 - 陸用鼎의 宜田記述을 중심으로, In 개화기 한국과 세계의 상호교류" (2004), 국학자료원
- 노대환, "동도서기론 형성 과정 연구" (2005), 일지사
- 장영숙, "동도서기론의 정치적 역할과 변화", 역사와 현실, (60), pp.345~374 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 박정심, "신기선(申箕善)의 유학경위(儒學經緯)을 통해 본 동도서기론(東道西器論)의 사상적 특징(思想的 特徵)Ⅰ", 역사와 현실, (60), pp.315~343 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 박은숙, "동도서기론자의 ‘民富國强’론과 민중 인식 ≪한성주보≫를 중심으로", 한국근현대사연구, (47), pp.7~39 (2008), 한국근현대사학회
- 양상현, "동도서기론과 광무개혁의 성격", 동양학, 28 (1998)
- 손형부, "박규수의 개화사상연구" (1997), 일조각
- 김명호, "환재 박규수 연구" (2008), 창비
- 장인성, "장소 국제정치사상-동아시아 질서변동기 요코이 쇼난과 김윤식", pp.348~349 (2002), 서울대학교출판부
- 정창렬, "한말 변혁운동의 정치·경제적 성격, In 한국민족주의론", pp.18~ (1982), 창작과비평사
- 조병한, "19세기 중국 개혁운동에서의 ‘중체서용’", 동아시아역사연구, 2, pp.145~146 (1997)
- 김형종, "근대중국에서의 전통과근대", 인문논총, 50, pp.11~ (2003), 서울대 인문학연구원
- 申箕善, "農政新編" (2002)
- 조병한, "중국 근대의 형성과 문화 ― 세계화시대의 동아시아 담론 ―", 동양사학연구, (115), pp.101~136 (2011), 동양사학회
- "고종실록", ~
- 金允植, "曉諭國內大小民人(1882년), In 金允植全集 2"
- "승정원일기", ~
- 金允植, "宜田記述評語三十四則, In 續陰晴史 上", 156~ (1891)
- 조경달, "朝鮮における大國主義と小國主義の相克", 朝鮮史 硏究會論文集, 22 (1985)
- 金允植, "時務說送陸生鐘倫遊天津, In 金允植全集 下", pp.19~
- 杉村濬, "在韓苦心錄, In 서울대 남겨둔 꿈", pp.102~ (1993), 건국대출판부
- 배항섭, "개항기의 對淸意識과 그 변화 -민중계의 동향을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, 16 (2001), 한국사상사학회
- "논설", 독립신문, ~ (1896)
- 김형종, "근대중국에서의 전통과 근대", 인문논총, 50, pp.15~ (2003), 서울대 인문학연구원
- 金允植, "新學六藝說", 대동학회월보, (6) (1908)
- 金允植, "金允植全集 下", pp.166~170 (1902)
- 盧大煥, "조선후기 『西學中國源流說』의 전개와 그 성격", 역사학보, 178, pp.113~139 (2003), 역사학회
- 이광린, "구한말 신학과 구학과의 논쟁", 동방학지, 23·24 (1980)
- 김도형, "대한제국기의 정치사상연구" (1994), 지식산업사
- 김도형, "한말 근대화 과정에서의 구학신학 논쟁", 역사비평, (36) (1996)
- 백동현, "대한제국기 新舊學論爭의 전개와 그 의의", 한국사상사학, 19 (2002), 한국사상사학회
- ’ 인식에 관한 연구, "동양철학연구", 2011, 97~122, pp.동양철학연구회
- 길진숙, "문명의 재구성 그리고 동양전통담론의 재해석, In 근대계몽기 지식의 발견과 사유지평의 확대" (2006), 소명
- 呂炳鉉, "格致學의 功用(續)", 대한협회회보, 7 (1908)
- 成樂賢, "欲學新學先學舊學", 대동학회월보, 20 (1909)
- 楊致中, "守舊가 反愈於就新", 太極學報, 22, pp.12~14 (1908)
- 李棕夏, "新舊學問이 同乎아 異乎아", 대동학회월보, 2 (1909)
- 金思說, "學問體用", 대동학회월보, 1, pp.38~41 (1908)
- 李奎濚, "東洋協和도 亦 智識平等에 在홈", 서우, 15, pp.36~ (1908)
- "大韓協會趣旨書", 대한협회회보, 1, pp.1~ (1908)
- 尹孝定, "演說 第一回 總會時 :大韓協會의 本領", 대한협회회보, 1, pp.47~ (1908)
- 金成喜, "政黨의 事業은 國民의 責任", 대한협회회보, 1, pp.27~ (1908)
- 이광수, "신생활론, In 이광수전집 17", pp.524~ (1963), 삼중당
- 謙谷, "人의 事業은 競爭으로 由야 發達", 서우, 16, pp.1~ (1908)
- 朴殷植, "賀吾同門諸友", 서북학회월보, 1, pp.1~3 (1908)
- 會員 朴殷植, "敎育이 不興이면 生存을 不得", 서우, 1, pp.8~ (1906)
- "謙谷生 本校의 測量科", 서우, 17, pp.3~ (1907)
- 이만열, "박은식의 사학사상", 숙대 사론, 9 (1976)
- 謙谷 朴殷植, "自强能否의 問答", 대한자강회월보, 4, pp.1~ (1906)
- "세계에는 강권이 첫째", 대한매일신보, ~ (1909)
- 呂炳鉉, "新學問의 不可不修", 대한협회회보, (8), pp.12~ (1908)
- 楊致中, "守舊가 反愈於就新", 太極學報, 22, pp.13~ (1908)
- 배항섭, "근대를 상대화하는 방법: 민중사에서 바라보는 근대 - 『이단의 민중반란』과 『민중과 유토피아』를 읽고", 역사비평, (88), pp.358~380 (2009), 역사문제연구소
- 申箕善, "學無新舊(前號續)", 大同學會月報, 6, pp.6~ (1908)
- 申箕善, "學無新舊", 大同學會月報, 5, pp.8~10 (1908)
- 申箕善, "學無新舊(前號續)", 大同學會月報, 6, pp.4~6 (1908)
- 남명진, "동서철학에 있어서의 시간의 문제", 동서철학연구, (48), pp.267~294 (2008), 한국동서철학회
- 이행훈, "新舊 관념의 교차와 전통 지식 체계의 변용", 한국철학논집, (32), pp.215~249 (2011), 한국철학사연구회
- "논설", 황성신문, ~ (1898)
- "別報", 황성신문, ~ (1898)
- "개벽 7", 16~ (1921)
- 임형택, "개항기 유교지식인의 "근대" 대응논리 -혜강 최한기의 기학을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 38 (2001)