본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 전기의 고구려 초기 都城 위치 비정과 그 실상

First-half Joseon's Identification of Early Goguryeo Capital City Location

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The determination of early Goguryeo' capital cities was not fully conducted until the first half Joseon. The first capital city, Jolbon of Goguryeo, was determined as today's Seongcheon, Pyeongannam-do, and its second capital city, Fortress Guknae, was determined as today's Uiju, Pyeonganbuk-do. Doubtlessly, Jolbon and Guknae are Huanren and Jian, north of River Yalu, respectively, and this study identified the following reasons why first-half Joseon's determination of Goguryeo capital city location was so conducted. First, the location of Jolbon was forgotten, after Goguryeo fell. But it happened that the name of the river flowing through Seongcheon was Biryu-gang, the same name as Biryu-su mentioned in the Goguryeo founding myth. Thus, Seongcheon was determined as Jolbon, and Goguryeo Fortress, west of Seongcheon, was named Fortress Heulgol associated with Fortress Heulseunggol mentioned in the myth. In the case of Fortress Guknae, today's River Hun, Yeomnansu, was wrongly identified as River Aihe, based on historical data to the first half of Joseon. On top of such identification, Fortress Guknae was identified as a location not far away from the northeast of the merging point of River Yalu and River Aihe. Thus, Goryeosa could express Uiju as Fortress Guknae. On top of this, Donggukyeojiseungram wrongly identified the boundary of Fortress Guknae as Fortress Guknae. These errors led to Fortress Guknae being identified as Uiju. The reason why Seogcheon was identified as Jolbon after all was that the river, running through Seongcheon, happened to have the same name as Biryusu mentioned in Goguryeo founding myth, leading to such misconception. The reason why Uiju was identified as Fortress Guknae was attributed to the combined errors of wrongly recognizing Yeomnansu as River Aihe, and of misreading the boundary of Fortress Guknae as Fortress Guknae. These misconceptions and errors could hardly hide certain intentions.

Abstract

The determination of early Goguryeo' capital cities was not fully conducted until the first half Joseon. The first capital city, Jolbon of Goguryeo, was determined as today's Seongcheon, Pyeongannam-do, and its second capital city, Fortress Guknae, was determined as today's Uiju, Pyeonganbuk-do. Doubtlessly, Jolbon and Guknae are Huanren and Jian, north of River Yalu, respectively, and this study identified the following reasons why first-half Joseon's determination of Goguryeo capital city location was so conducted. First, the location of Jolbon was forgotten, after Goguryeo fell. But it happened that the name of the river flowing through Seongcheon was Biryu-gang, the same name as Biryu-su mentioned in the Goguryeo founding myth. Thus, Seongcheon was determined as Jolbon, and Goguryeo Fortress, west of Seongcheon, was named Fortress Heulgol associated with Fortress Heulseunggol mentioned in the myth. In the case of Fortress Guknae, today's River Hun, Yeomnansu, was wrongly identified as River Aihe, based on historical data to the first half of Joseon. On top of such identification, Fortress Guknae was identified as a location not far away from the northeast of the merging point of River Yalu and River Aihe. Thus, Goryeosa could express Uiju as Fortress Guknae. On top of this, Donggukyeojiseungram wrongly identified the boundary of Fortress Guknae as Fortress Guknae. These errors led to Fortress Guknae being identified as Uiju. The reason why Seogcheon was identified as Jolbon after all was that the river, running through Seongcheon, happened to have the same name as Biryusu mentioned in Goguryeo founding myth, leading to such misconception. The reason why Uiju was identified as Fortress Guknae was attributed to the combined errors of wrongly recognizing Yeomnansu as River Aihe, and of misreading the boundary of Fortress Guknae as Fortress Guknae. These misconceptions and errors could hardly hide certain intentions.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. "三國志", ~
  2. "魏書", ~
  3. "通典", ~
  4. "資治通鑑", ~
  5. "三國史記", ~
  6. "三國遺事", ~
  7. "東國史略", ~
  8. "東國世年歌", ~
  9. "高麗史", ~
  10. "世宗實錄", ~
  11. "三國史節要", ~
  12. "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
  13. "東國通鑑", ~
  14. "東國史略", ~
  15. "標題音註東國史略", ~
  16. "東國地理志", ~
  17. "我邦疆域考", ~
  18. "訥齊集", ~
  19. "虛白堂集", ~
  20. 환인ㆍ집안 지역 고구려 유적 지질조사 보고서, "김현숙", 고구려연구재단, ~ (2005)
  21. 박인호, "조선시기 역사가와 역사지리인식" (2003), 이회
  22. 李丙燾, "韓國史(古代篇)" (1959), 震檀學會
  23. 林基中, "燕行錄全集8" (2001), 동국대출판부
  24. 趙炳魯, "韓國驛制史" (2002), 한국마사회 마사박물관
  25. 韓永愚, "朝鮮前期史學史硏究" (1981), 서울大學校出版部
  26. 남일룡, "조선사회과학학술집 206-조선의 성곽 1" (2010), 사회과학출판사
  27. 사회과학원 고고학연구소, "고구려의 성곽" (2009), 진인진
  28. 孫進起, "東北歷史地理1" (1988), 黑龍江人民出版社
  29. 구난희, "北方故土意識의推移에관한고찰Ⅰ- 발해멸망~조선후기 -", 고구려발해연구, 42, pp.247~275 (2012), 고구려발해학회[DOI]
  30. 권순홍, "고구려 초기의 都城과 改都 - 태조왕대의 왕실교체를 중심으로 -", 한국고대사연구, (78), pp.185~231 (2015), 한국고대사학회
  31. 서영대, "韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의正體性", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.85~100 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  32. 서일범, "북한지역 고구려산성 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2000
  33. 여호규, "고구려 초기의 梁貊과 小水貊", 한국고대사연구, 25, pp.91~130 (2002), 한국고대사학회
  34. 鄭求福, "韓國의 歷史認識上" (1976), 創作과 批評社
  35. 조법종, "고구려 초기도읍과 비류국성 연구", 백산학보, (77), pp.129~176 (2007), 백산학회
  36. 조법종, "高句麗의 郵驛制와 交通路 - 國內城시기를 중심으로 -", 한국고대사연구, (63), pp.41~79 (2011), 한국고대사학회
  37. 趙誠乙, "朝鮮初期古朝鮮․三韓․三國의 首都와 疆域認識", 科技考古硏究, 11 (2005)
  38. 조성을, "世宗實錄 地理志와 高麗史 地理志의歷史地理 認識", 조선시대사학보, (39), pp.77~111 (2006), 조선시대사학회
  39. 허태용, "조선후기 ‘南北國論’ 형성의 논리적 과정 검토", 동방학지, (152), pp.127~162 (2010), 국학연구원
  40. 김기웅, "고고민속론문집 9" (1984), 과학백과사전종합출판사
  41. 손수호, "흘골산성에 대하여", 조선고고연구, 78 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)