백제의 기문ㆍ대사 진출과정에 대한 재검토 - 513년 국제회의의 실상을 중심으로 -
Review of Baekje’s advance into GimunㆍDaesa: Focusing on the international conference held in 513 A.D.
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis can be summarized as follows. The record of Nihonsyoki in winter November keitai 7 is a distortion of the fact that envoy of BaekjeㆍSillaㆍAllaㆍBanpaㆍWa held an international conference in Alla by compiler. The process of Baekje’s advance into GimunㆍDaesa needs to be examined based on the actual circumstance of that international conference. Baekje tried to make an advance into Gimun and Daesa area, but this evoked a strong opposition by Banpa, the leading power of ‘Daegaya alliance’. Banpa attempted to block the advance of Baekje through an international conference with Silla as arbitrator. Baekje accepted the conference under the condition of Wa’s participation. Baekje supposed that Wa’s participation is in their favor because they had an amicable relationship with Wa. Alla was chosen as the venue for the conference. The reason is that Baekje and Banpa regarded Alla as a neutral territory. The conclusion of international conference was given in favor of Baekje. Banpa strongly protested at that decision and carried out a military action. However, this resulted in international isolation. To escape from the isolation, Banpa had to prosecute matrimonial alliance with Silla which was disadvantageous to them.
Abstract
This thesis can be summarized as follows. The record of Nihonsyoki in winter November keitai 7 is a distortion of the fact that envoy of BaekjeㆍSillaㆍAllaㆍBanpaㆍWa held an international conference in Alla by compiler. The process of Baekje’s advance into GimunㆍDaesa needs to be examined based on the actual circumstance of that international conference. Baekje tried to make an advance into Gimun and Daesa area, but this evoked a strong opposition by Banpa, the leading power of ‘Daegaya alliance’. Banpa attempted to block the advance of Baekje through an international conference with Silla as arbitrator. Baekje accepted the conference under the condition of Wa’s participation. Baekje supposed that Wa’s participation is in their favor because they had an amicable relationship with Wa. Alla was chosen as the venue for the conference. The reason is that Baekje and Banpa regarded Alla as a neutral territory. The conclusion of international conference was given in favor of Baekje. Banpa strongly protested at that decision and carried out a military action. However, this resulted in international isolation. To escape from the isolation, Banpa had to prosecute matrimonial alliance with Silla which was disadvantageous to them.
참고문헌 (46)
- "三國史記", ~
- "日本書紀", ~
- "梁職貢圖", ~
- 金泰植, "加耶聯盟史" (1993), 一潮閣
- 김태식, "미완의 문명 7백년 가야사 1" (2002), 푸른역사
- 金鉉球, "任那日本府硏究-韓半島南部經營論批判-" (1993), 一潮閣
- 김현구, "일본서기 한국관계기사 연구( Ⅱ )" (2003), 일지사
- 南在祐, "安羅國史" (2003), 혜안
- 盧重國, "百濟政治史硏究-國家形成 과 支配體制 의 變遷 을 中心 으로-" (1988), 一潮閣
- 연민수, "고대한일관계사" (1998), 도서출판 혜안
- 이용현, "가야제국과 동아시아" (2007), 통천문화사
- 千寬宇, "加耶史硏究" (1991), 一潮閣
- 高寬敏, "古代朝鮮諸國 と 倭國" (1997), 雄山閣出版
- 金鉉球, "大和政權 の 對外關係硏究" (1985), 吉川弘文館
- 田中俊明, "大加耶連盟 の 興亡 と‘ 任那 ’-加耶琴 だけが 殘 った" (1992), 吉川弘文館
- 森公章, "東 アジアの 動亂 と 倭國" (2006), 吉川弘文館
- 三品彰英, "日本書紀朝鮮關係記事考証 下" (2002), 天山舍
- 末松保和, "任那興亡史" (1949), 吉川弘文館
- 山尾幸久, "日本古代王權形成史論" (1983), 岩波書店
- 山尾幸久, "古代 の 日朝關係" (1989), 塙書房
- 大山誠一, "日本古代 の 外交 と 地方行政" (1999), 吉川弘文館
- 今西龍, "朝鮮古史 の 硏究" (1937), 近澤書店
- 金壽泰, "百濟 의 中央 과 地方" (1997), 대전, 忠南大學校百濟硏究所
- 김영심, "백제와 섬진강" (2008), 서경문화사
- 金鉉球, "百濟 의 加耶進出 에 관한 一考察", 東洋史學硏究, 70 (2000)
- 朴眞淑, "百濟東城王代 對外政策 의 變化", 百濟硏究, 32 (2000)
- 백승옥, "安羅高堂會議'의 성격과 安羅國의 위상", 지역과 역사, 0(14), pp.7~39 (2004), 부경역사연구소
- 白承忠, "6세기 전반 백제의 가야진출과정", 百濟硏究, 31 (2000)
- 백승충, "계체․흠명기 ‘임나(국) 4현 할양’ 기사의 성격", 지역과 역사, (31), pp.85~125 (2012), 부경역사연구소
- 유우창, "6세기 전반 가라와 ‘나제동맹’의 대립 -낙동강과 관련하여-", 역사와 세계, 41, pp.41~75 (2012), 효원사학회[DOI]
- 李永植, "百濟 의 加耶進出過程", 韓國古代史論叢, 7 (1995), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 이재석, "일본 고대국가 형성기의 知의 유통과 독점", 동양사학연구, (111), pp.99~126 (2010), 동양사학회
- 이재석, "6세기 초 繼體 新王朝 의 성립과 그 의의", 한성사학, 27 (2012)
- 李弘稙, "韓國古代史의 硏究" (1971), 新丘文化社
- 全榮來, "千寬宇先生還曆紀念韓國史學論叢" (1985), 正音文化社
- 정동준, "백제 담로제(檐魯制)의 역사적 위상에 대한 시론", 역사와 현실, (79), pp.189~229 (2011), 한국역사연구회
- 정재윤, "백제와 섬진강" (2008), 서경문화사
- 주성지, "웅진시대 백제의 蟾津江水系 진출", 慶州史學, 22 (2003)
- 홍성화, "己汶, 帶沙 지명 비정에 대한 일고찰", 史叢(사총), (82), pp.185~212 (2014), 역사연구소
- 朴珉慶, "6~7 世紀百濟 의 對倭關係硏究", 박사, pp.2014
- 서보경, "『일본서기』 한반도 관계 기사 검토", 박사, 사학, pp.2004
- 李根雨, "『日本書記』에 인용된 百濟三書에 관한 연구", 박사, 역사, pp.1994
- 武田幸男, "古代朝鮮 と 日本" (1974), 龍溪書舍
- 三品彰英, "日本書紀硏究 2" (1966), 塙書房
- 津田左右吉, "古事記及日本書紀 の 硏究" (1924), 岩波書店
- 今西龍, "百濟史硏究" (1934), 近澤書店