6세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미 — 국제정세의 변동과 백제의 책봉호에 반영된 인식을 중심으로 —
A Political Meaning of the Appointment Title in the 6th Century of East Asia — Focused on the Change of the International Situation and the Perception Reflected in the Appointment Title of Baekje —
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article compared and analyzed the general title or Sanguan(散官, prestige title) appointed for Baekje or other surrounding countries by Chinese southern dynasties, Northern Qi(北齊) and Sui(隋). Furthermoret, a appointer’s perception reflected in Ningdongdajiangjun(寧東大將軍, general title) and Dongqingzhoucishi(東靑州刺史, province governor) which are representative appointment titles, and the status of Baekje in the international order of East Asia were examined. A summary is as follows. In Chinese southern dynasties of 6th century, the number of appointment of surrounding countries decreased and hierarchizing between political organizations by the graded appointment of the general title diminished. As a result, the political use of the appointment title also decreased than the former period. Especially, appointment of western political organizations by Chinese dynasties and the political use of the appointment title decreased due to the depreciation in strategic value of western area because of Western Wei(西魏) and Northern Zhou(北周)‘s territory expansion. There was a small change in Baekje’s general title which had been practically fixed as Zhendongdajiangjun(鎭東大將軍, general title) during the 5th century. It was the degradation to Suidongjiangjun(綏東將軍, general title) in 524, and this appeared when Chinese southern dynasties appointed the lower general title than former period to surrounding countries. In the 6th century, Baekje was temporarily superior to Goguryeo on the general title unlike the 5th century when Baekje was inferior to Goguryeo throughout that century. It was the result of interaction of depreciating strategic value of Goguryeo and rising expectations for Baekje. In Northern Qi and Sui of 6th century, the number of appointment of surrounding countries were remarkably less than that of Chinese southern dynasties, and hierarchizing between political organizations by the graded appointment of the general title almost disappeared. This phenomenon means that the political use of the appointment title has disappeared. It was possible because Northern Qi was actually able to make appointment for only eastern political organizations due to the geographic situation surrounded by Northern Zhou(北周), Turk(突厥) and so on, and Sui could control surrounding countries not by the appointment but by the political power since Sui was closer to a unified empire from the establishment stage. The later half of the 6th century, when Northern Qi and Sui made appointment for surrounding countries, is inappropriate to compare the status in the international order between the Three kingdoms of ancient Korea(三國) by analyzing the general title or Sanguan appointed by Chinese dynasties. Ningdongdajiangjun which was appointed to King Muryeong(武寧王) was higher in rank than Ningdongjiangjun(寧東將軍, general title) appointed to king of Goguryeo in the same period. However, the reversal of the title disappeared by the appointment of King Seong(聖王) as Suidongjiangjun, which was lower in rank than Ningdongjiangjun. Dongqingzhoucishi was considered as the appointment title, as well as Dududongqingzhouzhugunshi (都督東靑州諸軍事, area commander-in-chief), which includes expectations of Northern Qi for the military support from Baekje. It is assumed that the appointment was made for Baekje because Northern Qi was not satisfied with the military support from Goguryeo and Silla which was accompanied by the appointment. The reason why Northern Qi had higher expectations in Baekje than Goguryeo and Silla is that they shared the same interests and needed each other.
Abstract
This article compared and analyzed the general title or Sanguan(散官, prestige title) appointed for Baekje or other surrounding countries by Chinese southern dynasties, Northern Qi(北齊) and Sui(隋). Furthermoret, a appointer’s perception reflected in Ningdongdajiangjun(寧東大將軍, general title) and Dongqingzhoucishi(東靑州刺史, province governor) which are representative appointment titles, and the status of Baekje in the international order of East Asia were examined. A summary is as follows. In Chinese southern dynasties of 6th century, the number of appointment of surrounding countries decreased and hierarchizing between political organizations by the graded appointment of the general title diminished. As a result, the political use of the appointment title also decreased than the former period. Especially, appointment of western political organizations by Chinese dynasties and the political use of the appointment title decreased due to the depreciation in strategic value of western area because of Western Wei(西魏) and Northern Zhou(北周)‘s territory expansion. There was a small change in Baekje’s general title which had been practically fixed as Zhendongdajiangjun(鎭東大將軍, general title) during the 5th century. It was the degradation to Suidongjiangjun(綏東將軍, general title) in 524, and this appeared when Chinese southern dynasties appointed the lower general title than former period to surrounding countries. In the 6th century, Baekje was temporarily superior to Goguryeo on the general title unlike the 5th century when Baekje was inferior to Goguryeo throughout that century. It was the result of interaction of depreciating strategic value of Goguryeo and rising expectations for Baekje. In Northern Qi and Sui of 6th century, the number of appointment of surrounding countries were remarkably less than that of Chinese southern dynasties, and hierarchizing between political organizations by the graded appointment of the general title almost disappeared. This phenomenon means that the political use of the appointment title has disappeared. It was possible because Northern Qi was actually able to make appointment for only eastern political organizations due to the geographic situation surrounded by Northern Zhou(北周), Turk(突厥) and so on, and Sui could control surrounding countries not by the appointment but by the political power since Sui was closer to a unified empire from the establishment stage. The later half of the 6th century, when Northern Qi and Sui made appointment for surrounding countries, is inappropriate to compare the status in the international order between the Three kingdoms of ancient Korea(三國) by analyzing the general title or Sanguan appointed by Chinese dynasties. Ningdongdajiangjun which was appointed to King Muryeong(武寧王) was higher in rank than Ningdongjiangjun(寧東將軍, general title) appointed to king of Goguryeo in the same period. However, the reversal of the title disappeared by the appointment of King Seong(聖王) as Suidongjiangjun, which was lower in rank than Ningdongjiangjun. Dongqingzhoucishi was considered as the appointment title, as well as Dududongqingzhouzhugunshi (都督東靑州諸軍事, area commander-in-chief), which includes expectations of Northern Qi for the military support from Baekje. It is assumed that the appointment was made for Baekje because Northern Qi was not satisfied with the military support from Goguryeo and Silla which was accompanied by the appointment. The reason why Northern Qi had higher expectations in Baekje than Goguryeo and Silla is that they shared the same interests and needed each other.
참고문헌 (20)
- 金鍾完, "中國南北朝史硏究-朝貢・交聘關係를 중심으로-" (1995), 一潮閣
- 嚴耕望, "中國地方行政制度史 乙部 上" (1963), 臺灣中央硏究院 歷史語言硏究所
- 梁起錫, "百濟 威德王代의 對外關係", 先史와 古代, 19 (2003)
- 김수태, "百濟 威德王의 정치와 외교", 韓國人物史硏究, 2 (2004)
- 방향숙, "한중 외교관계와 조공책봉" (2004), 동북아역사재단
- 여호규, "책봉호 수수(授受)를 통해 본 수·당의 동방정책과 삼국의 대응", 역사와 현실, (61), pp.31~59 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 박윤선, "위덕왕대 백제와 남북조의 관계", 역사와 현실, (61), pp.87~117 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 최진열, "中國 周邊國이 수용한 ‘王’의 이미지 ― 北朝의 異姓王 濫封과 百濟新羅의 複數王출현현상의 비교사적 이해 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (17), pp.173~225 (2007), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 최진열, "東晉·南北朝~唐代 주변국 冊封 封號의 地名 분석 ― 韓國古代 三國君主들의 冊封 郡王", 郡公 칭호의 이해를 중심으로 ―, 2008, pp.(197), 75~98[DOI]
- 박윤선, "백제와 송·제·양 교섭기사에 대한 고찰", 역사문화연구, (31), pp.3~32 (2008), 역사문화연구소
- 정재윤, "5~6세기 백제의 南朝 중심 외교정책과 그 의미", 백제문화, 2(41), pp.173~198 (2009), 백제문화연구소[DOI]
- 노중국, "무령왕대 백제의 동아시아 상에서의 위상", 백제문화, 1(46), pp.5~32 (2012), 백제문화연구소[DOI]
- 이주현, "魏晉南朝의 將軍制와 ‘寧東大將軍’", 백제문화, 1(46), pp.183~204 (2012), 백제문화연구소[DOI]
- 정동준, "5세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미-백제 및 남조 주변제국에 수여된 장군호를 중심으로", 역사와 세계, 52, pp.95~118 (2017), 효원사학회[DOI]
- 和田博德, "吐谷渾と南北兩朝との關係について", 史學, 25(2) (1951)
- 三崎良章, "北魏の對外政策と高句麗", 朝鮮學報, 102 (1982)
- 前島佳孝, "西魏の漢川進出と梁の内訌", 中央大學大學院硏究年報(文學), 28 (1999)
- 前島佳孝, "西魏の四川進攻と梁の帝位闘争", 中央大學大學院硏究年報(文學), 29 (2000)
- 會田大輔, "北周武帝の華北統一", アジア遊學, 213 (2017)
- 甄逸倫, "武興國之始末", 蘭州敎育學院學報, 1990(1) (1990)
