『道詵祕記』의 변화 과정과 그 역할
The Changing Process of Doseonbigi(道詵祕記) and its Role
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Doseon(道詵)'s prophets had a different name for the times, but it influenced Korea's history for many years. Doseon(道詵)'s prophets, which began in the 11th century, were based on the perception of ‘the master of feng shui’, During the Goryeo Dynasty, it was mainly discussed in the discussion concerning the fate of the country. After Joseon was founded, it was transformed into a means to justify the collapse of Goryeo and Joseon's founding. However, as Joseon entered a period of stability, Doseon(道詵) and his prophets became subject to criticism and control. Nevertheless, The government still showed a dual attitude of recognizing Doseon(道詵)’s authority when it comes to eum-taek feng shui. This led to a contradiction that deepened the anti-Generation of Doseon(道詵)’s prophets but also raised the Doseon(道詵)’s authority. As a result, in the 16th century, Doseon(道詵)’s prophets emerged that predicted the fall of Joseon, and In the 18th century, Doseonbigi(道詵祕記) that predicted chaos emerged. In the process, Doseon(道詵) was established as a ‘preditor’ and the prophecy borrowed his name was expanded to produce. Since then, Doseon(道詵) and his prophecy have become a cause and a means in various disturbance. In the end, it influenced the formation of the present Jeonggamnok(鄭鑑錄).
Abstract
Doseon(道詵)'s prophets had a different name for the times, but it influenced Korea's history for many years. Doseon(道詵)'s prophets, which began in the 11th century, were based on the perception of ‘the master of feng shui’, During the Goryeo Dynasty, it was mainly discussed in the discussion concerning the fate of the country. After Joseon was founded, it was transformed into a means to justify the collapse of Goryeo and Joseon's founding. However, as Joseon entered a period of stability, Doseon(道詵) and his prophets became subject to criticism and control. Nevertheless, The government still showed a dual attitude of recognizing Doseon(道詵)’s authority when it comes to eum-taek feng shui. This led to a contradiction that deepened the anti-Generation of Doseon(道詵)’s prophets but also raised the Doseon(道詵)’s authority. As a result, in the 16th century, Doseon(道詵)’s prophets emerged that predicted the fall of Joseon, and In the 18th century, Doseonbigi(道詵祕記) that predicted chaos emerged. In the process, Doseon(道詵) was established as a ‘preditor’ and the prophecy borrowed his name was expanded to produce. Since then, Doseon(道詵) and his prophecy have become a cause and a means in various disturbance. In the end, it influenced the formation of the present Jeonggamnok(鄭鑑錄).
참고문헌 (37)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "茶山詩文集", ~
- "陶谷集", ~
- "東史綱目", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "星湖僿說", ~
- "松窩雜說", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
- "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
- "日省錄", ~
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- "筆苑雜記", ~
- "弘齋全書", ~
- 김우철, "推案及鞫案 9", pp.9~ (2014), 흐름
- 김우철, "推案及鞫案 10", pp.10~ (2014), 흐름
- 김우, "推案及鞫案 12", pp.12~ (2014), 흐름
- 이병도, "(改訂版)高麗時代의 연구- 特히 圖讖思想의 發展을 中心으로 -" (1980), 아세아문화사
- 장지연, "고려·조선 국도풍수론과 정치이념" (2015), 신구문화사
- 조윤선, "推案及鞫案 61", pp.61~ (2014), 흐름
- 황 현, (2016), 역사비평사
- 고성훈, "朝鮮後期 變亂硏究", 박사, pp.1994
- 권순형, "高麗中期 南京에 對한 一考察", 향토서울, 49 (1990), 서울특별시사편찬위원회
- 김갑동, "고려시대의 南京", 서울학연구, (18), pp.81~112 (2002), 서울학연구소
- 김신회, "‘정감록’ 기억의 형성과 예언서 출현: 1739년 李濱 사건을 중심으로", 한국문화, (84), pp.215~253 (2018), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 나각순, "고려시대 남경의 도시시설", 成大史林, 12-13 (1997)
- 박상현, "조선 후기 ‘예언가 남사고’의 탄생과그에 대한 인식의 변화", 지방사와 지방문화, 20(2), pp.99~133 (2017), 역사문화학회[DOI]
- 박종덕, "고려시대 풍수지리사상연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 백승종, "18~19세기 『정감록』을 비롯한 각종 예언서의 내용과 그에 대한당시대인들의 해석", 진단학보, 88 (1999)
- 백승종, "조선후기 천주교와《鄭鑑錄》: 소문화집단의 상호작용", 교회사연구, (30), pp.5~46 (2008), (재)한국교회사연구소
- 이원명, "고려중 후기 이후 천도 논의와 조선조 한양 천도의 의미", 인문논총, 28 (2014), 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소
- 장지연, "조선 전기 漢陽의 지세 인식과 風水 논란 및 설화", 역사문화연구, (46), pp.3~34 (2013), 역사문화연구소
- 정연주, "조선 成宗代 崔灝元의 ‘裨補說’ 논의에 대한 고찰", 한국인물사연구, (22), pp.165~190 (2014), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 한미옥, "도선설화에 나타난 신화성과 정치성", 국학연구론총, (12), pp.1~25 (2013), 택민국학연구원[DOI]
- 한승훈, "최초의 정감록 영역본, 그리고 한국 예언서 연구의 난제들: John Jorgensen, 2018 The Foresight of Dark Knowing, University of Hawaii Press", 한국문화, (84), pp.433~453 (2018), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 한승훈, "조선후기 변란의 종교사 연구 : 추국 자료로 본 반란과 혁세 종교", 박사, pp.2019