본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고종의 경운궁 환궁과 러시아･일본 외교관의 시선

Gojong's Return to the Palace and Views of Russian and Japanese Diplomats

김영수
수선사학회|2020.07|사림 (SARIM, The Historical Journal)|제73호|pp. 155-188

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Foreigners고종Korean Empire베베르현상유지정책환궁러시아공사관가토 마쓰오Gojong's return to the PalaceAgwan PacheonGyeongwoong Palace
주제분류역사학

초록

The negotiations between Russia and Japan proceeded as the organization of the Joseon army and Gojong's return to the Palace came together during the period of Agwan Pacheon. After Gojong's return to the Palace, the issue of training Korean troops over the protection of his personal affairs was a diplomatic issue. Russia insisted that it could carry out the organization of the Korean army on its own. Japan insisted that the Russo-Japanese jointly carry out the organization of the Korean Army. Eventually, the Russian Military Instructor arrived in October 1896 and selected 800 elite troops. Gojong was able to return to Gyeongwoong Palace in February 1897 when the Russian Palace Guard was organized. At that time, there were various views of Gojong's return to the Palace. Americans in Korea found that Gojong's return to the Palace was consistent with the goals of the pro-Japanese and the place of safety. In fact, Gyeongwoong Palace was immediately adjacent to the US legation, Russian legation and British Consulate General. Gojong was able to expect help from foreigners in Korea when faced with a crisis in the Jeongdong foreign area. If Gojong are in a hurry, Gojong can escape to Russian and US construction officials. Kato, Japanese minister, argued that Gojong's return to the Palace was realized because of the Japanese government's idiomatic Korean strategy. The Russian documents differed in the view that King Gojong's return to the Palace was related to Gojong's cooperation with Russia, or Gojong's unilateral action. In the end, Gojong's return to the Palace was decided by the Joseon government's subjective will. In February 1897, Gojong began the process of resolving the conflict between Russia and Japan and pursuing independent nations after Joseon Dynasty. Above all, Gojong's return to the Palace was linked to the future political activities of the Korean Empire and the Emperor.

Abstract

The negotiations between Russia and Japan proceeded as the organization of the Joseon army and Gojong's return to the Palace came together during the period of Agwan Pacheon. After Gojong's return to the Palace, the issue of training Korean troops over the protection of his personal affairs was a diplomatic issue. Russia insisted that it could carry out the organization of the Korean army on its own. Japan insisted that the Russo-Japanese jointly carry out the organization of the Korean Army. Eventually, the Russian Military Instructor arrived in October 1896 and selected 800 elite troops. Gojong was able to return to Gyeongwoong Palace in February 1897 when the Russian Palace Guard was organized. At that time, there were various views of Gojong's return to the Palace. Americans in Korea found that Gojong's return to the Palace was consistent with the goals of the pro-Japanese and the place of safety. In fact, Gyeongwoong Palace was immediately adjacent to the US legation, Russian legation and British Consulate General. Gojong was able to expect help from foreigners in Korea when faced with a crisis in the Jeongdong foreign area. If Gojong are in a hurry, Gojong can escape to Russian and US construction officials. Kato, Japanese minister, argued that Gojong's return to the Palace was realized because of the Japanese government's idiomatic Korean strategy. The Russian documents differed in the view that King Gojong's return to the Palace was related to Gojong's cooperation with Russia, or Gojong's unilateral action. In the end, Gojong's return to the Palace was decided by the Joseon government's subjective will. In February 1897, Gojong began the process of resolving the conflict between Russia and Japan and pursuing independent nations after Joseon Dynasty. Above all, Gojong's return to the Palace was linked to the future political activities of the Korean Empire and the Emperor.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. "독립신문, 1897.2.20", ~ (1897)
  2. "독립신문, 1897.2.23", ~ (1897)
  3. "독립신문, 1897.2.25", ~ (1897)
  4. "高宗實錄, 高宗 33년(1896) 10월 31일", ~ (1896)
  5. "高宗實錄, 高宗 33년(1896) 2월 11일", ~ (1896)
  6. "高宗實錄, 高宗 33년(1896) 2월 16일", ~ (1896)
  7. "高宗實錄, 高宗 33년(1896) 8월 10일", ~ (1896)
  8. "高宗實錄, 高宗 33년(1896) 8월 11일", ~ (1896)
  9. "高宗實錄, 高宗 34년(1897) 2월 18일", ~ (1897)
  10. "高宗實錄, 高宗 34년(1897) 2월 19일", ~ (1897)
  11. "承政院日記, 高宗 34년(1897) 1월 18일", ~ (1897)
  12. "承政院日記, 高宗 34년(1897) 1월 19일", ~ (1897)
  13. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(9)", 機密第65號 國王 還宮에 관한 件, 特命全權公使 原敬外務大臣 侯爵 西園寺公望, ~ (1896)
  14. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(9)", 機密第92號 러시아 육군사관의 朝鮮兵 훈련에 관한 件, 加藤 臨時代理公使外務大臣 伯爵大隈重信, ~ (1896)
  15. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(10)", 電信 明禮宮修理着手와 國王還御 件, 原 公使西園寺, ~ (1896)
  16. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第15號 施政一班 등보고, 加藤 臨時代理公使大隈 外務大臣, ~ (1896)
  17. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 機密第2號 慶運宮 移御 遷延 건, 加藤 臨時代理公使外務大臣 伯爵 大隈重信, ~ (1897)
  18. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第17號 施政一班 등 보고, 加藤 臨時代理公使大隈 外務大臣, ~ (1896)
  19. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第18號 任免一束, 加藤 臨時代理公使大隈 外務大臣, ~ (1896)
  20. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第1號 陛下의 明禮宮出御 件 등 보고, 加藤 臨時代理公使文部大臣 兼 外務大臣 侯爵 西園寺公望, ~ (1896)
  21. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第4號 內地暴徒 情況 등보고, 特命全權公使 原敬外務大臣 侯爵 西園寺公望, ~ (1896)
  22. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 報告第9號 施政一班 등 보고, 特命全權公使 原敬外務大臣 侯爵 西園寺公望, ~ (1896)
  23. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 機密第10號 國王還御의 原因과 還御後의 形勢, 加藤 辨理公使外務大臣 伯爵 大隈重信, ~ (1897)
  24. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 機密第13號 國王還御에 관한러시아 공사의 담화, 加藤 辨理公使外務大臣 伯爵 大隈重信, ~ (1897)
  25. "駐韓日本公使館記錄(11)", 機密第15號 在韓 帝國領事會議를 召集하고자 하는 건, 加藤 辨理公使外務大臣 伯爵 大隈重信, ~ (1897)
  26. "АВПРИ(제정러시아 대외정책문서보관소). Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.14.Л.123-144об", ~
  27. "АВПРИ. Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.70.Л.25-26", ~
  28. "Корея глазами Россиян. Т. 5. М", ~ (2008)
  29. Пак Б.Б, "Российский дипломат К.И. Вебер и Корея. М", ~ (2013)
  30. "РГИА(러시아국립 역사문서보관소). ф.560.Оп.28.Д.24.Л.71-75", ~
  31. "РГИА. ф.560.Оп.28.Д.24.Л.77-80", ~
  32. "Россия и Корея. М : МГИМО", ~ (2004)
  33. 國史編纂委員會, "국역 윤치호 영문 일기 4권" (2015), 國史編纂委員會
  34. 國史編纂委員會, "尹致昊日記 5권" (1984), 國史編纂委員會
  35. 김영수, "러시아군사교관 단장 뿌짜따와", 군사, (61), pp.91~120 (2006), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  36. 김영수, "서울주재 러시아공사 베베르의 외교활동과 한국정책", 서울과 역사, (94), pp.7~44 (2016), 서울역사편찬원[DOI]
  37. 김영수, "주한 러시아공사 쉬뻬이에르의 외교활동과 한국정책", 역사학보, (233), pp.151~180 (2017), 역사학회[DOI]
  38. 김영수, "명례궁약정과 한러비밀협정을 통해본 모스크바대관식(1896)", 역사와 현실, (106), pp.291~323 (2017), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  39. 노대환, "閔泳翊의 삶과 정치활동", 한국사상사학, 18 (2002), 한국사상사학회
  40. 릴리아스 호톤 언더우드, "상투의 나라" (1999), 집문당
  41. 윤효정, "대한제국아 망해라" (2010), 다산북스
  42. 尹孝定, "風雲韓末秘史 : 最近 六十年秘錄" (1937), 野談社
  43. 이민원, "고종의 환궁에 관한 연구", 한국근현대사연구, 1 (1994)
  44. 이민원, "(한국을 둘러싼 러·일 갈등)명성황후시해와 아관파천" (2002), 국학자료원
  45. 이윤상, "황제의 궁궐 경운궁", 서울학연구, (40), pp.1~24 (2010), 서울학연구소
  46. 박규현, "근대 한불 외교자료. 1-3" (2018), 선인
  47. 호머 헐버트, "대한제국 멸망사" (1999), 집문당
  48. 홍순민, "광무 연간 전후 경운궁의 조영 경위와 공간구조", 서울학연구, (40), pp.25~74 (2010), 서울학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

대한제국 초기 고종의 정국구상과 궁내부의 세력변동김영수수선사학회 · 사림2008 · 제31호아관파천, 1896 : 서울, 도쿄, 모스크바김영수수선사학회 · 사림2010 · 제35호‘出宮門路’를 통해 본 고종의 景福宮 운영안희경서울역사편찬원 · 서울과 역사2015 · 제90호근대 정동의 공간 변화와 고종서정현서울역사편찬원 · 서울과 역사2013 · 제84호日韓關係史から見た景福宮기미지마 가즈히코서울역사편찬원 · 서울과 역사2019 · 제103호고종의 공사파견과 그 의미현광호사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 · 동북아연구2013 · 제28권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

고구려 졸본도읍기 王城의 추이와 전승의 정비강진원pp. 1-30신라 중고기 대왕-갈문왕 체제의 성립과 성골의 출현박수진pp. 31-51신라 후비제의 비교사적 고찰 — 正妃의 지위를 중심으로 —이현주pp. 53-83한국에서 자기 생산 기술의 도입과 확산에 대한 일고찰전용호pp. 85-127조선 중기 시기 구분에 대한 검토 — 사족사회의 형성 문제를 중심으로 —송웅섭pp. 129-153
원문 보기