본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Study on Production Inducement Effects in Key Industries of Korea and the Netherlands

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Although the growth of trade industry has been pushed mainly by intermediary trades due to Korea's geopolitical characteristics, intermediary trades fail to take the pivotal role in industrial growth because the environment could not support the industry on the national level. This study intends to help find new trade structures and directions to break the problem, by comparing Korea with the Netherlands, which has similar characteristics with Korea. Design/methodology/approach: This study applied the competitive import model and used data from World Input-output Data(WIOD), and focused on Information and Communications Technologies(ICT) manufacturing and ICT service industries as the key industries in Korea, and chemical and medical industries as the key industries in the Netherlands. Findings: The results indicated that Korea's ICT manufacturing and chemical industries have high backward linkage effect, while the Netherlands' ICT manufacturing, ICT service, and medical industries have high forward linkage effect. Research limitations/implications: When comparing between industries, it is clearer to consider not only the effect of generating production but also the creation of value added and the creation of employment in order to directly compare differences. As a contribution, comparisons between countries with large-scale trade were found to require the use of competitive models over non-competitive ones. Originality/value: This study showed that competitive analysis model should be used instead of non-competitive import model when Input-Output(IO) analysis is applied to countries with a high proportion of intermediary trade.

Abstract

Purpose: Although the growth of trade industry has been pushed mainly by intermediary trades due to Korea's geopolitical characteristics, intermediary trades fail to take the pivotal role in industrial growth because the environment could not support the industry on the national level. This study intends to help find new trade structures and directions to break the problem, by comparing Korea with the Netherlands, which has similar characteristics with Korea. Design/methodology/approach: This study applied the competitive import model and used data from World Input-output Data(WIOD), and focused on Information and Communications Technologies(ICT) manufacturing and ICT service industries as the key industries in Korea, and chemical and medical industries as the key industries in the Netherlands. Findings: The results indicated that Korea's ICT manufacturing and chemical industries have high backward linkage effect, while the Netherlands' ICT manufacturing, ICT service, and medical industries have high forward linkage effect. Research limitations/implications: When comparing between industries, it is clearer to consider not only the effect of generating production but also the creation of value added and the creation of employment in order to directly compare differences. As a contribution, comparisons between countries with large-scale trade were found to require the use of competitive models over non-competitive ones. Originality/value: This study showed that competitive analysis model should be used instead of non-competitive import model when Input-Output(IO) analysis is applied to countries with a high proportion of intermediary trade.

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Costinot, A., "Trade Theory with Numbers : Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization", Handbook of International Economics, 4, pp.197~261 (2014)
  2. Ahn, J., "The role of intermediaries in facilitating trade", Journal of International Economics, 84(1), pp.73~85 (2011)
  3. BMI, "Worldwide Medical Market Forecasts to 2019", BMI, ~ (2014)
  4. Brax, S., "A manufacturer becoming service providerchallenges and a paradox", Managing Service Quality : An International Journal, 15(2), pp.142~155 (2005)
  5. Brizga, J., "Drivers of CO2 emissions in the former Soviet Union : A country level IPAT analysis from 1990 to 2010", Energy, 59, pp.743~753 (2013)
  6. Chenery, H. B., "International comparisons of the structure of production", Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.487~521 (1958)
  7. Dietzenbacher, E., "The construction of world input-output tables in the WIOD project", Economic Systems Research, 25(1), pp.71~98 (2013)
  8. Ferracuti, N., "Healthcare Policies And Systems In Europe And China: Comparisons And Synergies", pp.79~ (2017)
  9. Garcia-Mila, T., "The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered", The review of economics and statistics, pp.177~180 (1996)
  10. García-Muñiz, A. S., "ICT technologies in Europe : A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory", Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), pp.360~370 (2014)
  11. Gorgoni, S., "Networks of International Trade and Investment: Understanding" (2018), Vernon Press
  12. Han, S. Y., "The role of the four electric power sectors in the Korean national economy : an input-output analysis", Energy policy, 32(13), pp.1531~1543 (2004)
  13. Do computers call for training? Firm-level evidence on complementarities between ICT and human capital investments, "Hempell, T.", ~ (2003)
  14. Hirschman, A. O., "The strategy of economic development" (1958), Yale University Press
  15. Huarng, K. H., "A comparative study to classify ICT developments by economies", Journal of Business Research, 64(11), pp.1174~1177 (2011)
  16. Isard, W., "Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of a space-economy", The review of Economics and Statistics, pp.318~328 (1951)
  17. World medical industry change and progress, "Lee, J. H.", KIET(Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade), ~ (2005)
  18. 정도영, "투입산출표를 이용한 한국 농림어업의 고용구조와 고용유발효과 변화추이 분석", 농업경영.정책연구, 37(2), pp.249~280 (2010), 한국농식품정책학회
  19. Smart Health Care Medical Devices Technology and Standards Strategy Report, "KHIDI(Korea health industry development institute)", Korea health industry development institute, ~ (2018)
  20. Kim, M. S., "The changing pattern of industrial technology linkage structure of Korea : Did the ICT industry play a role in the 1980s and 1990s?", Technological forecasting and social change, 76(5), pp.688~699 (2009)
  21. Kim, S. W., "Analysis and Significance of OECD Digital Economic Outlook", Korea information Society Development institute, 29(19), pp.1~48 (2017)
  22. KOTRA(Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency), "Netherlands", Amsterdam Trade Center, ~ (2015)
  23. Lau, L. J., "Input-occupancy-output models of the non-competitive type and their application-an examination of the China-US trade surplus", Social Sciences in China, 31(1), pp.35~54 (2010)
  24. Lau, L. J., "Non-Competitive Input-Output Model and Its Application : An Examination of the China-US Trade Surplus", Social Sciences in China, 5, pp.91~103 (2007)
  25. Lee, C., "Competitive advantage of broadband Internet: a comparative study between South Korea and the United States", Telecommunications Policy, 28(9-10), pp.649~677 (2004)
  26. DonHee Lee, "Comparison of Efficiency of Healthcare Systems of Countries with Global Competitiveness Using Data Envelopment Analysis", Global Business and Finance Review, 21(1), pp.46~55 (2016), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  27. Lee, D. H., "The relationship among competitive advantage, catch-up, and linkage effects : a comparative study on ICT industry between South Korea and India", Service Business, 13(3), pp.603~624 (2019)
  28. Lenzen, M., "Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption : an input-output analysis", Energy policy, 26(6), pp.495~506 (1998)
  29. Lenzen, M., "CO2 multipliers in multi-region input-output models", Economic Systems Research, 16(4), pp.391~412 (2004)
  30. Leontief, W. W., "Input-Output Economic", Operational Research Quarterly, 3(2), pp.30~31 (1952)
  31. Leontief, W. W., "Input-output analysis" (1966), Oxford University Press
  32. Leontief, W., "Structural interdependence and economic development", pp.119~150 (1963), Palgrave Macmillan
  33. Lim, S. A., "Starter of Bio chemical industry" (2014), December
  34. Liu, X., "Do local manufacturing firms benefit from transactional linkages with multinational enterprises in China?", Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7), pp.1113~1130 (2009)
  35. Goods Follow Bytes: The Impact of ICT on EU Trade, "Mattes, A.", DIW, 1~25 (2012)
  36. Miller, R. E., "Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions" (2009), Cambridge university press
  37. Min, Y. K., "A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among Korea, China, the USA, Germany and Japan", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(3), pp.454~472 (2019)
  38. Moses, L. N., "The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis", The American Economic Review, 45(5), pp.803~826 (1955)
  39. Ottaviano, G. I., "The costs and benefits of leaving the EU", ~ (2014)
  40. Ozkan, B., "Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture", Renewable energy, 29(1), pp.39~51 (2004)
  41. Park, S. H., "Intersectional Relationship between Manufacturing and Service : New Evidence from selected Pacific Basin Countries", ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 10(3), pp.245~263 (1994)
  42. Perry, A. C., "The evolution of the US international trade intermediary in the 1980s : a dynamic model", Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), pp.133~153 (1990)
  43. Posco, "Korea chemical industry in commodity trap", POSCO, ~ (2015)
  44. Rohman, I. K., "The globalization and stagnation of the ICT sectors in European countries: An input-output analysis", Telecommunications Policy, 37(4-5), pp.387~399 (2013)
  45. Trading myths: Addressing misconceptions about trade, jobs, and competitiveness, "Roxburgh, C.", McKinsey Global Institute, ~ (2012)
  46. Schultz, S., "Approaches to identifying key sectors empirically by means of input-output analysis", The Journal of development studies, 14(1), pp.77~96 (1977)
  47. 서정교, "보건산업과 한방산업의 경제적 파급효과 비교분석", 산업경제연구, 22(5), pp.2457~2475 (2009), 한국산업경제학회
  48. Dynamic analysis and development strategy of innovation system in Korea, "Shin, T. Y.", STEPI, ~ (2012)
  49. Stone, R., "Input-output and national accounts" (1961), Organisation for European Economic Co-operation
  50. Su, B., "Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade : competitive versus noncompetitive imports", Energy Policy, 56, pp.83~87 (2013)
  51. Suder, G., "The evolving geography of production hubs and regional value chains across East Asia : Trade in value-added", Journal of World Business, 50(3), pp.404~416 (2015)
  52. The Bank of Korea, "Korea economic structure for 2012 industry linkage table", Bank of korea, ~ (2014)
  53. Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels, "Wang, Z.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.No. w19677 (2013)
  54. Xing, W., "Measuring convergence of China's ICT industry : An input-output analysis", Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), pp.301~313 (2011)
  55. Xu, T., "Economic impacts and challenges of China’s petroleum industry : an input-output analysis", Energy, 36(5), pp.2905~2911 (2011)
  56. Yang, C., "Entry barrier's difference between ICT and non-ICT industries", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(3), pp.461~480 (2013)
  57. Zhang, C., "A multi-regional input-output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China", Ecological Economics, 100, pp.159~172 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)