정부 지원 환자안전 연구의 타당성 검토
Feasibility Study of Government-Sponsored Patient Safety Research
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to figure out the current state of patient safety research in Korea and to evaluate whether the research fund support project for patient safety research is proceeding in priority order. Methods: Through the literature search, a list of research projects in the field of patient safety in Korea were collected as of January 6, 2017. Four researchers independently evaluated the subject using the priority list of patient safety research derived from the previous study. Results: As of January 2017, a total of 21 research projects were conducted in the Korea Health Industry Development Institute and 42 research studies were conducted in the National Science & Technology Information. The results of the priority evaluation showed that there were no researches that ranked first and second priority. Many of the research topics were ‘Adverse drug events/drug errors,’ ‘Health information technology/information systems,’ and ‘Less relevance.’ Conclusion: Patient safety research projects are not only diverse but also quantitative in Korea. Support for research topics that need to be prioritized is needed, such as developing safety indicators and measuring patient safelty levels, improving communication, and improving patient safety incident reporting systems.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to figure out the current state of patient safety research in Korea and to evaluate whether the research fund support project for patient safety research is proceeding in priority order. Methods: Through the literature search, a list of research projects in the field of patient safety in Korea were collected as of January 6, 2017. Four researchers independently evaluated the subject using the priority list of patient safety research derived from the previous study. Results: As of January 2017, a total of 21 research projects were conducted in the Korea Health Industry Development Institute and 42 research studies were conducted in the National Science & Technology Information. The results of the priority evaluation showed that there were no researches that ranked first and second priority. Many of the research topics were ‘Adverse drug events/drug errors,’ ‘Health information technology/information systems,’ and ‘Less relevance.’ Conclusion: Patient safety research projects are not only diverse but also quantitative in Korea. Support for research topics that need to be prioritized is needed, such as developing safety indicators and measuring patient safelty levels, improving communication, and improving patient safety incident reporting systems.
참고문헌 (21)
- Institute of Medicine, "Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century" (2001), National Academies Press
- 이상일, "환자안전법 시행의 의의와 과제", 보건복지포럼, 240, pp.2~4 (2016)
- 옥민수, "Identifying Adverse Events Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Y Codes in Korea: A Cross-sectional Study", 예방의학회지, 51(1), pp.15~22 (2018), 대한예방의학회
- 옥민수, "Assessing Reliability of Medical Record Reviews for the Detection of Hospital Adverse Events", 예방의학회지, 48(5), pp.239~248 (2015), 대한예방의학회
- Leape LL, "What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety", JAMA, 288, pp.501~507 (2002)[DOI]
- Pronovost PJ, "Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation", BMJ, 337, pp.a1714~ (2008)[DOI]
- Vincent C, "Patient safety" (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
- "The research cycle: measuring harm"[URL]
- Bates DW, "Global priorities for patient safety research", BMJ, 338, pp.b1775~ (2009)[DOI]
- Ravaghi H, "Research priorities in the field of patient safety in Iran: results of a Delphi study", J Patient Saf (2015)
- 환자안전체계 구축 기반연구, "김수경", 한국보건의료연구원, 1~145 (2016)
- Morris RL, "Identifying primary care patient safety research priorities in the UK: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership", BMJ Open, 8, pp.e020870~ (2018)[DOI]
- Plint AC, "Establishing research priorities for patient safety in emergency medicine: a multidisciplinary consensus panel", Int J Emerg Med, 8, pp.1~ (2015)[DOI]
- "ntis.go.kr"[URL]
- "Patient safety"[URL]
- Downie J, "Patient safety law: from silos to systems" (2006), Health Policy Research Program, Health Canada
- 옥민수, "환자안전 관련 법의 구조와 현황", 보건행정학회지, 25(3), pp.174~184 (2015), 한국보건행정학회
- Yu A, "Patient safety 2030" (2016), NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
- 이상일, "환자안전 관리의 현황과 개선 방향", HIRA 정책동향, 8, pp.5~15 (2014)
- Prey JE, "Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21, pp.742~750 (2014)[DOI]