Mechanical Prophylaxis Compared with Low-molecular-weight Heparins for Preventing Venous Thrombosis after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic and Meta-analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background : Mechanical prophylaxis (MP) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been widely used after patient undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, their efficacy in preventing venous thrombus remains unclear. Methods : PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched for studies that investigated the effectiveness between MP and LMWHs. Predefined outcomes were incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal DVT and major bleeding using random-effects models. Results : A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 2899 patients were eligible for inclusion. No significant difference was observed between MP and LMWHs for the prevention of DVT (RR 1.37; 95% CI: 0.83-2.26), PE (RR 1.35; 95% CI: 0.41-4.41), or proximal DVT (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 0.55- 3.02). However, there was a significant reduction of major bleeding (RR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.05-0.82). Predefined subgroup analysis suggested that MP might enhance the occurrence of DVT in comparison with fixed-dose LMWHs (RR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.09-2.37), but not in the subgroup with adjusted-weight LMWHs (RR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11-1.30). Without combining graduated compression stockings (GCS) in both groups, the incidence of DVT was significantly associated with MP (RR 1.88; 95% CI: 1.01-3.21). Conclusions : Results of this meta-analysis suggested, compared to LMWHs, MP might have no significance in the prevention of DVT, although it was associated with lower incidence of major bleeding after patients underwent orthopedic surgery. However, subgroup analyses suggested that fixed-based LMWHs or application one of mechanical types without GCS might have differential effects. Therefore, large-scaled and well-designed RCTs are needed in the future.
Abstract
Background : Mechanical prophylaxis (MP) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been widely used after patient undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, their efficacy in preventing venous thrombus remains unclear. Methods : PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched for studies that investigated the effectiveness between MP and LMWHs. Predefined outcomes were incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal DVT and major bleeding using random-effects models. Results : A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 2899 patients were eligible for inclusion. No significant difference was observed between MP and LMWHs for the prevention of DVT (RR 1.37; 95% CI: 0.83-2.26), PE (RR 1.35; 95% CI: 0.41-4.41), or proximal DVT (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 0.55- 3.02). However, there was a significant reduction of major bleeding (RR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.05-0.82). Predefined subgroup analysis suggested that MP might enhance the occurrence of DVT in comparison with fixed-dose LMWHs (RR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.09-2.37), but not in the subgroup with adjusted-weight LMWHs (RR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11-1.30). Without combining graduated compression stockings (GCS) in both groups, the incidence of DVT was significantly associated with MP (RR 1.88; 95% CI: 1.01-3.21). Conclusions : Results of this meta-analysis suggested, compared to LMWHs, MP might have no significance in the prevention of DVT, although it was associated with lower incidence of major bleeding after patients underwent orthopedic surgery. However, subgroup analyses suggested that fixed-based LMWHs or application one of mechanical types without GCS might have differential effects. Therefore, large-scaled and well-designed RCTs are needed in the future.
참고문헌 (29)
- Heit JA, "The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism", J Thromb Thrombolysis, 41(1), pp.3~14 (2016)
- Falck-Ytter Y, "Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines", Chest, 141(Suppl 2), pp.e278S~e325S (2012)
- 박신형, "Incidences of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Mechanical Compression Device with and without Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 28(3), pp.213~218 (2016), 대한슬관절학회
- Hill J, "Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: summary of NICE guidance", BMJ, 340(7740), pp.c95~ (2010)
- Colwell Jr CW, "Thrombosis prevention after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial comparing a mobile compression device with low-molecular-weight heparin", JBJS, 92(3), pp.527~535 (2010)
- Hardwick ME, "A mobile compression device compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in total hip arthroplasty", Orthopaedic Nursing, 30(5), pp.312~316 (2011)
- Colwell Jr CW, "Thrombosis prevention in lower extremity arthroplasty: mobile compression device or pharmacological therapy", Surgical Technology International, 25, pp.233~238 (2014)
- Francis CW, "Prevention of VTE in patients having major orthopedic surgery", Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 35(3), pp.359~367 (2013)
- Imai N, "Manual calf massage and passive ankle motion reduce the incidence of deep vein thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty", J Orthop Sci, 22(4), pp.726~730 (2017)
- 조우람, "Preventing Venous Thromboembolism with Use of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Korean Patients", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(8), pp.1319~1323 (2016), 대한의학회
- Spain DA, "Comparison of sequential compression devices and foot pumps for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in high-risk trauma patients", The American Surgeon, 64(6), pp.522~ (1998)
- Panic N, "Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses", PLoS One, 8(12), pp.e83138~ (2013)
- Kahn SR, "The postthrombotic syndrome: evidencebased prevention, diagnosis and treatment strategies", Circulation, 130(18), pp.1636~1661 (2014)
- Higgins JPT, "The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials", BMJ, 343, pp.d5928~ (2011)
- Higgins J, "Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis", Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), pp.1539~1558 (2002)
- Julian PTH, "Measuring in consistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327(7414), pp.557~ (2003)
- Egger M, "Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315(7109), pp.629~634 (1997)
- Dupont WD, "Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression", Controlled Clinical Trials, 19(6), pp.589~601 (1998)
- Stone MH, "A comparison of intermittent calf compression and Enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in total hip replacement", International Orthopaedics, 20(6), pp.367~369 (1997)
- Warwick D, "Comparison of the use of a foot pump with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. A prospective, randomized trial", JBJS, 80(8), pp.1158~1166 (1998)
- Pietsch M, "Mechanical versus drug prevention of thrombosis after total hip endoprosthesis implantation. A randomized, controlled clinical study", Biomed Tech, 48(7-8), pp.207~212 (2003)
- Pitto RP, "Mechanical prophylaxis of deepvein thrombosis after total hip replacement", Bone & Joint Journal, 86(5), pp.639~642 (2004)
- Camporese G, "Low-molecular-weight heparin versus compression stockings for thromboprophylaxis after knee arthroscopy: a randomized trial, low-molecular-weight heparin versus compression stockings for thromboprophylaxis", Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(2), pp.73~82 (2008)
- Chin PL, "Thromboembolic prophylaxis for total knee arthroplasty in Asian patients: a randomised controlled trial", J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 17(1), pp.1~5 (2009)
- Eppsteiner RW, "Mechanical compression versus subcutaneous heparin therapy in postoperative and posttrauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis", World Journal of Surgery, 34(1), pp.10~19 (2010)
- Khatod M, "Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in more than 30,000 total knee arthroplasty patients: is there a best choice?", J Arthroplasty, 27(2), pp.167~172 (2012)
- Burnett RS, "Failure of the American College of Chest Physicians-1A protocol for lovenox in clinical outcomes for thromboembolic prophylaxis", J Arthroplasty, 22(3), pp.317~324 (2007)
- Snyder MA, "Efficacy in deep vein thrombosis prevention with extended mechanical compression device therapy and prophylactic aspirin following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized control trial", J Arthroplasty, 32(5), pp.1478~1482 (2017)
- Bin Abd Razak HR, "Prevalence of venous thromboembolic events Is Low in Asians After Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Chemoprophylaxis", J Arthroplasty, 32(3), pp.974~979 (2017)
