본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의료기관 의약품 부작용 발생 공유 및 중재, 약물안전카드 발급시스템 현황 조사

A Survey on Hospital Systems for Adverse Drug Event (ADE) History Information Sharing, Intervention, and Drug Safety Card Issue

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background : This study aimed to investigate the current status of adverse drug event (ADE) history sharing, intervention, and drug safety card issue system in medical institutions. Methods : A total of 126 member hospitals of the Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists (response rate 25.9%) participated in this survey. Results : The survey results showed that 87.3% of the respondents had an ADE report system and most of them assessed causality (83.9%) and severity/seriousness (67.8%). About 85.6% of hospitals had a clinical alert or information system for prescriptions related to previous ADE history. Hard stop, soft stop, and passive alerts (information only) were generated in 11.0%, 38.1%, and 62.7% of the respondent hospitals, respectively. The criteria for generating alerts were mostly based on causality or severity/seriousness. Among hospitals with an ADE report system, 41.5% had a system issuing drug safety cards (Adverse drug reactions card, ADRs card). Among hospitals issuing ADR cards, 71.4% and 51.0% used causality and severity/seriousness assessment on the decision to issue, respectively. Frequent drug classes for which ADR cards were issued were contrast agents, antibiotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Identified barriers to implementing the ADR card issue system were the absence of standard guidelines, lack of awareness, and shortage of manpower. Conclusion : ADE report system was well established in 87% of respondent hospitals but around 40% of them had a system for issuing ADR cards. To extend the issuance and use of ADR cards, it is necessary to develop a standard procedure for recording, reporting ADRs, and issuing ADR cards.

Abstract

Background : This study aimed to investigate the current status of adverse drug event (ADE) history sharing, intervention, and drug safety card issue system in medical institutions. Methods : A total of 126 member hospitals of the Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists (response rate 25.9%) participated in this survey. Results : The survey results showed that 87.3% of the respondents had an ADE report system and most of them assessed causality (83.9%) and severity/seriousness (67.8%). About 85.6% of hospitals had a clinical alert or information system for prescriptions related to previous ADE history. Hard stop, soft stop, and passive alerts (information only) were generated in 11.0%, 38.1%, and 62.7% of the respondent hospitals, respectively. The criteria for generating alerts were mostly based on causality or severity/seriousness. Among hospitals with an ADE report system, 41.5% had a system issuing drug safety cards (Adverse drug reactions card, ADRs card). Among hospitals issuing ADR cards, 71.4% and 51.0% used causality and severity/seriousness assessment on the decision to issue, respectively. Frequent drug classes for which ADR cards were issued were contrast agents, antibiotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Identified barriers to implementing the ADR card issue system were the absence of standard guidelines, lack of awareness, and shortage of manpower. Conclusion : ADE report system was well established in 87% of respondent hospitals but around 40% of them had a system for issuing ADR cards. To extend the issuance and use of ADR cards, it is necessary to develop a standard procedure for recording, reporting ADRs, and issuing ADR cards.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. "International drug monitoring: the role of national centres: report of a WHO meeting", World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 498, pp.1~25 (1972)
  2. Coleman JJ, "Adverse drug reactions", Clin Med(Lond), 16(5), pp.481~485 (2016)
  3. 박수빈, "약물이상반응 감시 현황: 단일기관 10년 자료 분석", 대한내과학회지, 96(4), pp.341~351 (2021), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  4. 조민경, "의약품부작용보고원시자료 기반 약물 아나필락시스 사례 분석", Allergy Asthma & Respiratory Disease, 8(1), pp.30~35 (2020), 대한 소아알레르기 호흡기학회
  5. 석승한, "2주기 의료기관인증제의 개선방향: 국제적 수준의 환자안전과 의료 질을 위하여", 대한의사협회지, 57(8), pp.646~649 (2014), 대한의사협회[DOI]
  6. 김경숙, "요양병원 인증 2주기 당면과제 및 해결방안", 병원경영학회지, 21(3), pp.65~70 (2016), 한국병원경영학회
  7. 강주현, "한ㆍ일 재활의료기관 평가인증 제도의 비교 연구", 보건과 복지, 23(4), pp.49~68 (2021), 한국보건복지학회[DOI]
  8. 장정희, "정신병원간호사의 의료기관인증제에 대한 인식과 안전분위기가 환자안전관리활동에 미치는 영향", 정신간호학회지, 25(4), pp.375~385 (2016), 한국정신간호학회
  9. 박초열, "EMR 인증제 시행 후 상급병원 종사자들의 EMR 인증제 및 영향에 대한 인식", 보건의료산업학회지, 16(1), pp.91~105 (2022), 보건의료산업학회
  10. A Case Study for the Safe Implementation of Blockchain: Focused on Hospital Information System, "Sung won Oh", Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences Summer Conference, ~ (2017)
  11. 김주은, "안과에서 시행한 진료정보교류에 대한 효과 분석", 대한안과학회지, 60(3), pp.261~267 (2019), 대한안과학회
  12. Brockow K, "Drug allergy passport and other documentation for patients with drug hypersensitivity-An ENDA", EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group Position Paper, 2016, pp.71(11), 1533~1539
  13. 강동윤, "에페리손에 의한 즉시형 과민반응 증례 보고", Allergy Asthma & Respiratory Disease, 5(4), pp.228~231 (2017), 대한 소아알레르기 호흡기학회[DOI]
  14. de Lusignan S, "Enhanced passive surveillance of influenza vaccination in England, 2016-2017- an observational study using an adverse events reporting card", Hum Vaccin Immunother, 15(5), pp.1048~1059 (2016)
  15. 조민경, "요오드화 조영제 과민반응에 대한 임상 대처 최신 지견", Allergy Asthma & Respiratory Disease, 8(3), pp.107~113 (2020), 대한 소아알레르기 호흡기학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)