관형 구성에서의 운율 실현 양상 연구
Prosodic Feature Differences in Korean Adnominal Structures
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate how prosodic features of utterance change depending on the types of adnominal constructions. We analyzed AP(accentual phrase) patterns, the duration of syllable and pause patterns within relative clause structures and compound nouns in utterances spoken by Seoul Korean speakers in their twenties. The results show that compound nouns and relative clause constructions composed of the same phonemes were different at the boundary position of accentual phrase and at tone pattern. In addition, the duration of word-final syllable of adnominal form was on average 1.6-fold longer in relative clause constructions than in compound noun. Furthermore, interference of accentual phrase boundary between relative clauses and modified nouns was more frequent in non-restrictive than in restrictive relative clause constructions. And the duration of word-final syllable of adnominal form was on average 1.2-fold longer in non-restrictive than in restrictive relative clauses. Unlike some previous studies where pauses were considered to be an indication of word or clause boundaries, the results in this study do not show pauses between adnominal form and modified nouns in either compound nouns or relative clause constructions. Our data suggest that AP boundary, AP tone pattern and syllable lengthening are more important than pauses to display syntactic and semantic differences in the sentences when phonemic condition is the same.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate how prosodic features of utterance change depending on the types of adnominal constructions. We analyzed AP(accentual phrase) patterns, the duration of syllable and pause patterns within relative clause structures and compound nouns in utterances spoken by Seoul Korean speakers in their twenties. The results show that compound nouns and relative clause constructions composed of the same phonemes were different at the boundary position of accentual phrase and at tone pattern. In addition, the duration of word-final syllable of adnominal form was on average 1.6-fold longer in relative clause constructions than in compound noun. Furthermore, interference of accentual phrase boundary between relative clauses and modified nouns was more frequent in non-restrictive than in restrictive relative clause constructions. And the duration of word-final syllable of adnominal form was on average 1.2-fold longer in non-restrictive than in restrictive relative clauses. Unlike some previous studies where pauses were considered to be an indication of word or clause boundaries, the results in this study do not show pauses between adnominal form and modified nouns in either compound nouns or relative clause constructions. Our data suggest that AP boundary, AP tone pattern and syllable lengthening are more important than pauses to display syntactic and semantic differences in the sentences when phonemic condition is the same.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김석근, "설명적 관계절과 제한적 관계절 간의 통사적 차이에 관한 연", 논문집, 29(1), pp.85~96 (1990), 경상대학교
- 김선철, "서울말 억양의 음운론적 기술을 위한 시고", 한글, 239, pp.53~78 (1998), 한글학회
- 김성규, "잠재적 휴지의 실현", 선청어문, 27, pp.831~859 (1999), 서울대 국어교육과
- 김영석, "영어음운론" (1993), 한국문화사
- 김정우, "합성어 내부 경계의 음운론적 의의－ 가휴지와 잠재 휴지 －", 배달말, (35), pp.343~367 (2004), 배달말학회
- 김태경, "구어 주석 코퍼스 구축을 위한 발화 단위 연구", 한국언어문화, (28), pp.5~26 (2005), 한국언어문화학회
- 민광준, "한일 양 언어 운율의 음향음성학적 대조 연구" (2004), J&C
- 민수정, "한국어와 영어 발화에 나타나는 휴지(pause)의 음성학적 비교분석", 언어과학, 17(4), pp.39~57 (2010), 한국언어과학회
- 박철주, "통사적 합성명사의 생성원리 연구- ‘용언+체언’의 통사적 합성명사를 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 39, pp.63~90 (2007), 우리말글학회
- 成喆在, "한국어 리듬의 실험음성학적 연구 : 시간 구조와 관련하여", 박사, pp.1994
- 안병섭, "휴지(pause)의 역할에 대한 반성적 검토", 우리어문연구, (28), pp.67~87 (2007), 우리어문학회
- 양영하, "구어담화에 나타난 ‘쉼’의 기능", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.79~100 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이필영, "대등절과 종속절에 관하여", 선청어문, 22(1), pp.645~669 (1994), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 임규홍, "‘쉼’의 언어 기능에 대한 연구", 한글, 235, pp.93~125 (1997), 한글학회
- 전윤실, "길이 구조와 통사 경계 구분", 언어학, 19(2), pp.191~207 (2011), 대한언어학회
- 정진영, "관형구성 합성명사 연구", 문창어문논집, 41, pp.287~310 (2004), 문창어문학회
- Cho, Y. Y, "Syntax and Phrasing in Korean, In The Phonology-Syntax Connection", pp.47~62 (1999), Chicago University Press
- Clifton, C. Jr, "Informative Prosodic Boundaries", Language and Speech, 45, pp.87~114 (2002)
- Cooper, W. E, "Hierarchical Coding in Speech Timing", Cognitive Psychology, 10, pp.154~177 (1978)
- Goldman-Eisler, F, "Pauses, Clauses, Sentences", Language and Speech, 15, pp.103~113 (1972)
- Jun, S. A, "The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody", 박사, pp.1993
- Jun, S. A, "K-ToBI Labelling Convention; Version 3.1", UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 99, Journal of Speech Science, 7(1), pp.143~169 (2000)
- Klat, D. H, "Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse", Journal of Phonetics, 3, pp.129~140 (1975)
- Lehiste, I, "Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Aambiguity", Glossa, 7, pp.107~121 (1973)
- Price, P. J, "The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 90, pp.2956~2970 (1991)
- Scott, D. R, "Duration as a Cue to the Perception of a Phrase Boundary", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 71, pp.996~1007 (1981)
- Silva, D. J, "Acoustic Evidence for the Emergence of Tonal Contrast in Contemporary Korean", Phonology, 23, pp.287~308 (2006)