「論語栗谷先生諺解」의 번역학적 분석
A Translatoloical Analysis of Noneo (The ANALECTS OF CONFUCIUS)yulgokseonsaengeonhae
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this thesis is to analyse some translatological peculiarities on the version of Noneoyulgokseonsaengeonhae. This version was translated by Yulgok about 1576 A.D. and was published in 1749 A.D. It is necessary to research this book as a translated material. There are some non-translated source sentences and translator’s notes. They were influenced by Zhu-Xi’s Annotation of The ANALECTS OF CONFUCIUS. Source text is composed of 15,826 Chinese characters and the target text is 8,368(about 53%). In target text there are two kinds of Sino-Koreans. One is cited Chinese character of source text as notation of Chinese character, the others are Korean meaning of Chinese character as notation of jeongeumja. The result of translation quality assessment especially Noneoyulgokseonsaengeonhae reveals some positive elements in the Sino-Korean notation of Chinese character and jeongeumja, but there are negative elements in the target sentence excessive components of source text. In translation process notation principles are very consistent.
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to analyse some translatological peculiarities on the version of Noneoyulgokseonsaengeonhae. This version was translated by Yulgok about 1576 A.D. and was published in 1749 A.D. It is necessary to research this book as a translated material. There are some non-translated source sentences and translator’s notes. They were influenced by Zhu-Xi’s Annotation of The ANALECTS OF CONFUCIUS. Source text is composed of 15,826 Chinese characters and the target text is 8,368(about 53%). In target text there are two kinds of Sino-Koreans. One is cited Chinese character of source text as notation of Chinese character, the others are Korean meaning of Chinese character as notation of jeongeumja. The result of translation quality assessment especially Noneoyulgokseonsaengeonhae reveals some positive elements in the Sino-Korean notation of Chinese character and jeongeumja, but there are negative elements in the target sentence excessive components of source text. In translation process notation principles are very consistent.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김영수, "조선 중세 한문 번역본의 언어사적 연구" (2001), 역락
- 김영수, "유경언해의 언어와 번역 관련 연구", 국제 고려학회 서울지회 논문집, 15, pp.71~92 (2011), 국제 고려학회 서울지회
- 김진아, "번역학 비판" (2006), 한국외대 출판부
- 김해수, "고대 한어" (1996), 한국문화사
- 김혜림, "중국 번역사상사" (2011), 이화여대 출판부
- 박경자, "번역과 번역하기", 고려대 출판부
- 박용삼, "번역학이란 무엇인가" (1990), 숭실대 출판부
- 儒學經典譯叢, "論語" (1992), 山東友誼書社出版
- 여찬영, "「中庸諺解」의 번역언어학적 분석", 언어과학연구, (38), pp.1~22 (2006), 언어과학회
- 의 번역언어학적 연구, "어문론총", 2006, 359~387, pp.한국문학언어학회
- 여찬영, "스코포스이론적 측면에서의 조선조 언해류", 우리말글, 46, pp.1~19 (2009), 우리말글학회
- 여찬영, "<훈민정음 언해본>의 번역학적 연구", 언어과학연구, (54), pp.105~122 (2010), 언어과학회
- 여찬영, "『孟子栗谷先生諺解』의 번역학적 연구", 우리말글, 56, pp.117~138 (2012), 우리말글학회
- 임우영, "번역이론 입문" (2011), 한국외국어대학교출판부
- 정연일, "번역학 입문" (2006), 한국외대 출판부
- 주송식, "고대한어통론" (1989), 중문출판사
- 최기천, "중국어 번역법" (1997), 학고방
- 최현배, "한글갈" (1940), 정음사
- 허지운, "번역학 발전사" (2010), 이화여대 출판부
- 홍윤표, "사서율곡선생언해 해제" (1984), 홍문각
