본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지식관리시스템의 수직적 확산과 수평적 확산에 관한 실증적 연구

The Factors Affecting Breadth and Depth of Diffusion for Knowledge Management Systems

서창교|설진영
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2008.12|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제9권 제3호|pp. 77-105|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2008.9.3.005

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

innovation diffusionknowledge management systemsbreadth of diffusiondepth of diffusion
주제분류경영학

초록

This study primarily aims at identifying what factors significantly affect the diffusion of knowledge management systems(KMS) and finding out how these identified factors can be effectively managed, especially for Korean companies. The research model is derived based on previous researches on innovation diffusion, information systems implementation, and KMS. The model is used to examine the role of determinants in influencing the extent to which KMS is diffused within organizations. Independent variables of this research are composed of technical characteristics, organizational characteristics and environmental characteristics. ‘Breadth of diffusion’ and ‘depth of diffusion’ concept are used to measure the extent of KMS diffusion which is the dependent variable of this model. The 101 companies of total 1,000 samples responded to the survey. To analyze the results of this empirical study, we performed the multiple regression analysis. As a result, it was shown that the relative advantage, complexity, information system maturity, size, top management support, champion, competitive pressure have influences on both the breadth and the depth diffusions. On the other hand, the organizational culture, valuation and compensation, and uncertainty of environmental factors were not verified to be significant. This empirical study will provide Korean companies with insights into effective ways to diffuse the KMS and succeed in business competition.

Abstract

This study primarily aims at identifying what factors significantly affect the diffusion of knowledge management systems(KMS) and finding out how these identified factors can be effectively managed, especially for Korean companies. The research model is derived based on previous researches on innovation diffusion, information systems implementation, and KMS. The model is used to examine the role of determinants in influencing the extent to which KMS is diffused within organizations. Independent variables of this research are composed of technical characteristics, organizational characteristics and environmental characteristics. ‘Breadth of diffusion’ and ‘depth of diffusion’ concept are used to measure the extent of KMS diffusion which is the dependent variable of this model. The 101 companies of total 1,000 samples responded to the survey. To analyze the results of this empirical study, we performed the multiple regression analysis. As a result, it was shown that the relative advantage, complexity, information system maturity, size, top management support, champion, competitive pressure have influences on both the breadth and the depth diffusions. On the other hand, the organizational culture, valuation and compensation, and uncertainty of environmental factors were not verified to be significant. This empirical study will provide Korean companies with insights into effective ways to diffuse the KMS and succeed in business competition.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 김경규, "지식공유의도와 지식관리시스템의 사용", 경영정보학연구, 15(3), pp.65~90 (2005)
  2. 김상수, "지식경영의 성공요인에 관한 실증적 연구", 경영학연구, 29(4), pp.585~616 (2000)
  3. 김승한, "전사적자원관리(ERP)의 확산에 관한 실증연구 ：정보기술", 정보시스템 혁신의 관점, 2001, pp.30(2), 475~501
  4. 김영걸, "지식경영의 이해", 정보과학회지, 21(10), pp.79~85 (2003)
  5. 김준영, "평가와 보상이 지식경영참여의지에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 제6회 한국지식경영학회 학술심포지엄, pp.211~231 (2001)
  6. 김효근, "조직의 지식경영준비도 측정도구 개발에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 2(1), pp.45~62 (2001)
  7. 서도원, "지식경영의 성공요인에 관한 실증적 연구：기업규모 및 업종별 비교를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 7(2), pp.69~96 (2006)
  8. 서창교, "지식관리시스템 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인", 경영정보학연구, 15(1), pp.1~24 (2005)
  9. 정대율, "공공기관의 지식관리시스템 수용모형에 관한 실증적 연구", 정보시스템연구, 13(2), pp.23~48 (2004)
  10. 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론" (2003), 학연사
  11. "2005년 IT 시장백서"[URL]
  12. Alavi,M., "Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems： Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues", MIS Quarterly, 25(1), pp.107~46 (2001)
  13. Bacon,C.J., "The Use of Decision Criteria in Selecting Information Systems", Technology Investments, 1992, pp.16(3), 335~353
  14. Beath,C.M., "Supporting the Information Technology Champion", MIS Quarterly, 15(3), pp.355~372 (1991)
  15. Benbasat,I., "Impact of Organizational Maturity on Information System Skill Needs", MIS Quarterly, 4(1), pp.21~34 (1980)
  16. Carr,N.G., "IT Doesn't Matter", Harvard Business Review, 81(5), pp.41~49 (2003)
  17. Chau,P.Y.K., "Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems：An Exploratory Study", MIS Quarterly, 21(1), pp.1~24 (1997)
  18. Chwelos,P., "Research Report：Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model", Information Systems Research, 12(3), pp.304~321 (2001)
  19. Cooper,R.B., "Information Technology Implementation Research：A Technological Diffusion Approach", Management Science, 36(2), pp.123~139 (1990)
  20. Davenport,T.H., "Successful Knowledge Management Projects", Sloan Management Review, 39(2), pp.43~57 (1998)
  21. Davenport,T.H., "Working Knowledge：How Organizations Manage What They Know" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
  22. Fornell,C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Model with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  23. Grover,V., "An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer Based Interorganizational Systems", Decision Science, 24(3), pp.603~639 (1993)
  24. Grover,V., "The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U. S. Organizations", Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), pp.141~163 (1993)
  25. Hair,J.F., "Multivariate Data Analysis(6th ed), Prentice Hall" (2006), River, NJ.
  26. Kwon T.H., "Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation In : Critical Issue in Information Systems Research", pp.227~251 (1987), John Wiley
  27. Lee,G., "Organizational size and IT innovation adoption：A meta-analysis", Information and Management, 43(8), pp.975~985 (2006)
  28. Marshall,C.,, "Financial Risk and the Need of Superior Knowledge Management", California Management Review, 38(3), pp.77~101 (1996)
  29. McGowan, M. K., "Adoption and Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange, in Larsen and McGuire(Eds), Information Systems Innovation and Diffusion：Issies and Directions, Idea Group Publishing, 116-140", ~ (1998)
  30. Moore,G.C., "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation", Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp.192~222 (1991)
  31. Nolan,R., "Managing the Crises in Data Processing", Harvard Business Review, 57(2), pp.115~126 (1979)
  32. Park,Y.T., "Knowledge management system for fourth generation R&D ：KNOWVATION", Technovation, 26(5), pp.595~602 (2006)
  33. Pierce,J.L., "Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation", Academy of Management Review, 2(1), pp.27~37 (1977)
  34. Premkumar,G., "An Empirical Assessment of Information Systems Planning and the Role of Information Systems in Organizations", Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), pp.99~125 (1992)
  35. Premkumar,G., "Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange：An Innovation Diffusion Perspective", Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), pp.157~186 (1994)
  36. Premkumar,G., "Adoption of New Information Technologies in Rural Small Businesses", Omega, 27(4), pp.467~484 (1999)
  37. Rai,A., "Stimulating the Use of Computer -Aided Software Engineering in Information Systems Departments：An Empirical Test of Elements of Innovation Theory", 박사, pp.1990
  38. Ramamurthy,K., "Determinants and Outcomes of Electronic Data Interchange Diffusion", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(4), pp.332~351 (1995)
  39. Rogers,E.M., "Diffusion of Innovations" (2003), The Free Press
  40. Ruggles,R.L., "The State of the Notion： Knowledge Management in Practice", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.80~89 (1998)
  41. Swanson,E.B., "Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations", Management Science, 40(9), pp.1069~1092 (1994)
  42. Tampoe,M., "Motivating Knowledge Workers- The Challenge for the 1990s", Long Range Planning, 26(3), pp.49~56 (1993)
  43. Teo,T.S.H., "A Contingency Model of Internet Adoption in Singapore", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(2), pp.95~118 (1997)
  44. Teo,T.S.H., "A Contingency Perspective on Internet Adoption and Competitive Advantage", European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), pp.78~92 (2003)
  45. Thong,J.Y.L., "An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Business", Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), pp.187~214 (1999)
  46. Tornatzky,L.G., "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption -Implementation：A Meta-Analysis of Findings", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), pp.28~45 (1982)
  47. Tornatzky,L.G., "The Processes of Technological Innovation" (1990), Lexington Books
  48. Van De Ven,A.H., "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation", Management Science, 32(5), pp.590~607 (1986)
  49. Xu,J., "A reality-based guide to KMS diffusion", Journal of Management Development, 24(4), pp.374~389 (2005)
  50. Xu,J., "A six-stage model for the effective diffusion of knowledge management systems", Journal of Management Development, 24(4), pp.362~373 (2005)
  51. Xu,J., "From rhetoric towards a model of practical knowledge management systems", Journal of Management Development, 24(4), pp.291~319 (2005)
  52. Xu,J., "Exploring the perceptions of knowledge management systems", Journal of Management Development, 24(4), pp.320~334 (2005)
  53. Xu,J., "Adoption and diffusion of knowledge management systems： field studies of factors and variables", Knowledge- Based Systems, 18(2), pp.107~115 (2005)
  54. Xu,J., "Adoption and diffusion of knowledge management systems：an Australian survey", Journal of Management Development, 24(4), pp.335~361 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

A Knowledge Stock and Flow Perspective for the Assimilation of Knowledge Management Innovation이재남, 최병구한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2010 · 제11권 제5호지식관리시스템에서의 지식공유에 대한 영향요인과 성과 간의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구고준, 공희경, 신선진한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2008 · 제9권 제2호지식경영시스템 품질 영향 요인 분석: 기술 및 과업 특성 관점에서봉동원, 이희석, 최수영한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2007 · 제8권 제2호지식공유의지의 영향요인에 대한 실증연구 - 지식관리시스템 사용자 중심으로 -강문상한국지식정보기술학회 · 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지2010 · 제5권 제2호지식 프로세스와 지식관리시스템의 성과강인원, 이건창, 이상재한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2008 · 제9권 제3호An Empirical Study Of Organizational Characteristics, Knowledge Management Activities, And Knowledge Management Performance권정미, 최만기한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2010 · 제17권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

집단갈등이 집단창의성에 미치는 영향：리더십 스타일과 커뮤니케이션의 조절효과한상숙, 백윤정pp. 1-19KMS 활성화에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구：로그 데이터 분석을 이용하여이대철, 임규건, 백승익, 이진숙pp. 21-42지식 프로세스와 지식관리시스템의 성과강인원, 이건창, 이상재pp. 43-57국내 인터넷 쇼핑몰 산업의 경쟁력 강화 및 신규수요 창출을 위한 전략：인터넷 쇼핑몰 수용자와 비수용자의 비교연구정남호pp. 59-76소비자 가치 지식을 활용한 웰빙 신제품 개발에 관한 탐색적 연구강민희, 한수진, 우정pp. 107-123
원문 보기