A Study on Korean First Year High School Students’ Compliment Responses Strategies
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research investigatedhow differently Korean first year high school students respond tocompliments in Korean and in English depending on L2 proficiency,gender, and addressee’s social status. For this study, 54 studentsresponded to a questionnaire consisting of six questions both in Englishand in Korean. Through this questionnaire survey, we investigated howdifferently the participants respond to compliments when they useEnglish and Korean respectively. The results showed that a differencebetween Korean and English positive responses to compliments wasminimal. However, the participants used more ‘accepting’ responses inEnglish than in Korean, and high-level high school learners of Englishshowed more ‘accepting’ responses than low-level high school learnersof English. On the other hand, there was only a slight differencebetween male students and female students in compliment responses,but there was a considerably substantial difference between complimentresponses to older people and to their friends, especially in terms of‘accepting.’ Pedagogical implications related to these results have alsobeen discussed.
Abstract
This research investigatedhow differently Korean first year high school students respond tocompliments in Korean and in English depending on L2 proficiency,gender, and addressee’s social status. For this study, 54 studentsresponded to a questionnaire consisting of six questions both in Englishand in Korean. Through this questionnaire survey, we investigated howdifferently the participants respond to compliments when they useEnglish and Korean respectively. The results showed that a differencebetween Korean and English positive responses to compliments wasminimal. However, the participants used more ‘accepting’ responses inEnglish than in Korean, and high-level high school learners of Englishshowed more ‘accepting’ responses than low-level high school learnersof English. On the other hand, there was only a slight differencebetween male students and female students in compliment responses,but there was a considerably substantial difference between complimentresponses to older people and to their friends, especially in terms of‘accepting.’ Pedagogical implications related to these results have alsobeen discussed.
참고문헌 (32)
- 박승윤, "영어와 국어에서의 칭찬 화행", 현대영미어문학, 26(1), pp.157~186 (2008), 현대영미어문학회
- 송영미, "한국어와 일본어의 칭찬 화행 연구", 이화교육논총, 13, pp.603~625 (2003)
- 이찬승, "HIGH SCHOOL EnlgishⅠ" (2013), 능률교육
- Austin, J. L., "How to Do Thing with Words" (1962), Oxford University Press
- Brown, P., "Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Blum-Kulka, S, "Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?", Journal of Pragmatics, 11, pp.131~146 (1987)
- Cha, Yoonjung, "Pragmatic Transfer in Korean Learners of English on Compliments Response", East West Education, 24, pp.1~17 (2007)
- Chen, R, "Responding to Compliment: A Contrastive Study of Politeness Strategies between American English and Chinese Speakers", Journal of Pragmatics, 20(1), pp.49~75 (1993)
- A Pilot Stud of Compliment Responses of Americanborn English Speakers and Chinese-born English Speakers, "Chiang, B.", ERIC, ~, pp.ED 364932 (1993)
- Crozet, C., "A Conceptual Framework to Help Teachers Identify Where Culture is Located in Language Use", pp.39~44 (2003), Language Australia
- Gajaseni, C., "A Contrastive Study of Compliment Responses in American English and Thai Including the Effect of Gender and Social Status", Ph. D., pp.1994
- Grossi, V, "Teaching Pragmatic Competence: Compliments and Compliment Responses in the ESL Classroom", Prospect Journal, 24(2), pp.53~62 (2009)
- Hedgcock, J. S., "Teaching Readers of English" (2009), Routledge
- Herbert, R. K, "Say Thank You or Something", American Speech, 61(1), pp.76~78 (1986)
- Herbert, R. K., "The Ethnography of English Compliment and Compliment Responses: A Contrastive Sketch", pp.3~36 (1989), John Benjamins
- Herbert, R. K, "Sex-based Difference in Compliment Behavior", Language in Society, 19, pp.201~224 (1990)
- Hobbs, P, "The Medium is the Message: Politeness Strategies in Men’s and Women’s Voice Mail Messages", Journal of Pragmatics, 35(2), pp.243~262 (2003)
- Holmes, J, "Compliments and Compliment Responses in New Zealand", Anthropological Linguistics, 12, pp.445~465 (1988)
- Holmes, J., "Teachers and Students Learning about Compliments", TESOL Quarterly, 21, pp.523~546 (1987)
- Huth, T, "Negotiating Structure and Culture: L2 Learners' Realization of L2 Compliment Response Sequences in Talk-in-talk Interaction", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.2025~2050 (2006)
- Knapp, M. L., "Compliments: A Descriptive Taxonomy", Journal of Communication, 34(4), pp.12~31 (1984)
- Lorenzo-Dus, N, "Compliment Responses among British and Spanish University Students: A Contrastive Study", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.107~127 (2001)
- Manes, J., "The Compliment Formula", pp.115~142 (1981), Mouton Publishers
- Nelson, G. L., "Arabic and English Compliment Responses: Potential for Pragmatic Failure", Applied Linguistics, 17(4), pp.411~432 (1996)
- Pomerantz, A., "Compliment Responses: Notes on the Cooperation of Multiple Constraints", pp.79~112 (1978), Academic Press
- 심재황, "Compliment Strategies for College Learners of English: Situations, Preferences, and Structures", 현대영어교육, 13(4), pp.47~66 (2012), 현대영어교육학회
- Thomas, J, "Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure", Applied Linguistics, 4, pp.91~112 (1983)
- Warga, M, "The Acquisition of French Apologetic Behavior in a Study Abroad Context", Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), pp.221~251 (2007)
- Wolfson, N., "An Empirically Based Analysis of Compliment in American English", pp.82~95 (1983), Newbury House
- Wolfson, N., "The Compliment as a Social Strategy", Papers in Linguistics, 13(3), pp.391~410 (1980)
- Yamini, H., "A Sociolinguistic Study of Sex-based Differences in Persian Compliment Patterns", 석사, pp.1996
- Yu, M, "Sociolinguistic Competence in the Complimenting Act of Native Chinese and American English Speakers: A Mirror of Cultural Value", Language and Speech, 48(1), pp.91~119 (2005)