한국 자연보호구역 현황 및 향후 개선방안 -호주의 사례를 중심으로-
The Current Status and Future Prospective of Protected Areas in Korea - Case study in Protected Areas of Australia -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed at comparing protected areas of Korea and Australia based on international conservation criteria by IUCN and analyzing what we need to improve for future management of protected areas of Korea. The registration status of protected areas of Korea listed on IUCN were 11 places in the Ia, 17 in II, 7 in IV, 7 in V; in total 42 places were recorded. However, the lists were missing many important areas. In Korea, we have only 4 protected area categories out of 6 indicating ecological diversity and management in its protected area system are insufficient. On the other hand, 9340 protected areas of Australia were listed on IUCN and evenly distributed in the total of six categories. Therefore, Korea should investigate measures for system establishment which ensures the diversity and indicative of our natural ecosystems and establish balanced system of protected areas including all IUCN categories I-VI through revaluation of natural, cultural, economic and social conditions and the needs.
Abstract
This study aimed at comparing protected areas of Korea and Australia based on international conservation criteria by IUCN and analyzing what we need to improve for future management of protected areas of Korea. The registration status of protected areas of Korea listed on IUCN were 11 places in the Ia, 17 in II, 7 in IV, 7 in V; in total 42 places were recorded. However, the lists were missing many important areas. In Korea, we have only 4 protected area categories out of 6 indicating ecological diversity and management in its protected area system are insufficient. On the other hand, 9340 protected areas of Australia were listed on IUCN and evenly distributed in the total of six categories. Therefore, Korea should investigate measures for system establishment which ensures the diversity and indicative of our natural ecosystems and establish balanced system of protected areas including all IUCN categories I-VI through revaluation of natural, cultural, economic and social conditions and the needs.
참고문헌 (18)
- 국립공원 타당성조사 기준 및 자연공원 제도개선 마련, "박용하", 환경부, 109~ (2008)
- 우형택, "국제 기준에 근거한 남북한 자연보호지역의 실상 비교", 한국환경과학회지, 11(1), pp.1~14 (2002), 한국환경과학회
- 자연친화적 국토이용을 위한 자연환경보호구역 관리체계개선연구, "윤양수", 국토연구원, ~ (2000)
- 생태계 보호지역 지정기준의 객관화연구, "환경부", ~ (2007)
- 환경부, "환경통계연감", (22) (2009)
- 허학영, "우리나라 보호지역에 IUCN 카테고리 적용 방안에 관한 연구", 환경정책연구, 6(2), pp.71~96 (2007), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
- IUCN, "1990 United Nations list of national parks and protected areas" (1990)
- IUCN, "Guidelines for protected area management categories", ~ (1994)
- IUCN, "1997 United Nations list of protected areas", ~ (1998)
- Locke,H., "Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm", Environmental Conservation, 32, pp.1~10 (2005)
- WCPA Australia, "Application of IUCN protected area management categories"
- "WCC"[URL]