본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소규모 개발이 수반되는 행정계획사전환경성검토 발전방안에 관한 연구- 온천공보호구역을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Improvement of Prior Environmental Review System(PERS)in a Administrative Plan & Program Including a Small-Scale Development- Focus on Hot Spring Hole Wildness -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

Korea has made the rapid economical development under the condition with the highpopulation density and low available land. In this context, conservation of land environment,connected directly with living quality of human, has mostly ignored.Prior Environment Review System(PERS) is the one to investigate the locational validity,environmental impacts, harmony with surrounding environment, from the early stage ofadministrative plan or development project.PERS was amended to include SEA(Strategic Environment Assessment) system on June 1, 2006.But, several problems, including the loss of administrative ability, cost, and time, have beenappeared, since the system is applied to all administrative plans without any distinction andplans or projects are delayed generally.In this study, the weaknesses of PERS were indicated through the comprehensive analysisincluding literature survey, study of legal and internet database, and the recently publishedPERS reports.Based on that, the improvement schemes were suggested to be harmonized with the natureof SEA. This study was mainly focused on a PERS for the designation of conservational area ofhot-spring wells, conducted by authors.

Abstract

Korea has made the rapid economical development under the condition with the highpopulation density and low available land. In this context, conservation of land environment,connected directly with living quality of human, has mostly ignored.Prior Environment Review System(PERS) is the one to investigate the locational validity,environmental impacts, harmony with surrounding environment, from the early stage ofadministrative plan or development project.PERS was amended to include SEA(Strategic Environment Assessment) system on June 1, 2006.But, several problems, including the loss of administrative ability, cost, and time, have beenappeared, since the system is applied to all administrative plans without any distinction andplans or projects are delayed generally.In this study, the weaknesses of PERS were indicated through the comprehensive analysisincluding literature survey, study of legal and internet database, and the recently publishedPERS reports.Based on that, the improvement schemes were suggested to be harmonized with the natureof SEA. This study was mainly focused on a PERS for the designation of conservational area ofhot-spring wells, conducted by authors.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 건설교통부 국토균형발전본부, "국토업무편람", 27~49 (2006)
  2. , 2005
  3. 김임순, "도표로 본 환경평가", pp.80~313 (2004), (주)블랙박스
  4. 김임순, "전략환경평가의 제도화 동향과 국내 도입방안", 환경영향평가, 12(3), pp.171~188 (2003), 한국환경영향평가학회
  5. 김임순, "전략환경평가를 통한 환경영향평가의 개선방향에 관한 연구-대안적 환경평가모형: APEMI IA MODEL의 제안", 환경정책, 12(2), pp.81~110 (2004), 한국환경정책학회
  6. 김임순, "환경영향평가 - 전략환경평가 -", pp.111~225 (2006), (주)북스힐
  7. 김임순, "전략환경평가의 제도화 동향과 국내 도입방안", 환경영향평가, 12(3), pp.171~188 (2003), 한국환경영향평가학회
  8. 김임순, "전략환경평가를 통한 환경영향평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  9. 김임순, "환경평가의 원칙과 절차", 2005년 추계세미나 한국환경기술인회연보, 10, pp.225~268 (2005), 환경평가와 환경경영 한국환경기술인회
  10. 김임순, "최신환경영향평가(이론과실제)", pp.185~224 (2003), 도서출판동화기술
  11. 송영일, "사전환경성검토제도의 개선 방안", pp.261~29 (2002), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
  12. 송영일, "전략환경평가제도의 시행 및 기대효과", 환경정책연구, 4(2), pp.19~30 (2005), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
  13. 유헌석, "국토관련계획에 대한 전략환경평가 적용 방안 중 전략환경평가제도의 이해", 7~12 (2006)
  14. 이용우, "국토관련계획에 대한 전략환경평가 적용방안", 3~6 (2006)
  15. 최종수, "사전환경검토제도의 효율적 운영방안", 토지개발기술학술지, 50, pp.138~151 (2001)
  16. 한강유역환경청, "사전환경성검토제도 운영및 개선현황", 1~25 (2006)
  17. Barry Dalal-Clayton, "Strategic Environmental Assessment", 1~113 (2005)
  18. Barry Sadler, "International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment", 1~362 (1996)
  19. CEQ, "Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners", 18~21 (2007)
  20. IAIA, "Power, Poverty and Sustain ability,The role of impact assessment", 26th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, pp.23~26 (2006)
  21. IAIA, "International Principles for Social Impact Assessment", pp.1~8 (2003)
  22. IAIA, "The linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions", 1~12 (2002)
  23. Maria Rosario Partidario, "Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Current Practices, Future Demands and Capacity-Bilding needs", pp.22~41 (2003), International Association for Impact Assessment
  24. Rau, "Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook", pp.13~15 (1980), McGRAWHILL BOOK Company
  25. Riki, "The thriver and Phillip Minas, Ensuring effective Substantiality Appraisal", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(2), pp.1461~5517 (2003)
  26. Theodore S. Glickman, "Readings in Risk, Resources for the Future", pp.1~14 (2000), The partnership Discussion on WEHAB
  27. US. CEQ, "Moderning NEPA Implementation", 1~18 (2003)
  28. US. CEQ, "The National Environmental Policy Act: A study of its effectiveness after twenty five years", 1~47 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)