영어 텍스트 유형이 한국인 대학생의 영어 요약문에 미치는 영향
Effects of Source Texts’ Types on Korean EFL College Learners’ Summary Writing Performance
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to investigate the extent to which source texts’ types affect Korean EFL college learners’ summary writings in terms of lexical, sentential, and discourse-level features. About 51 summary writings of three genres (cause/effect and comparison/contrast expository texts and argumentative texts) were collected and analyzed using a computational assessment tool, Coh-Metrix. The results show that the participants’ summary writings in the three different text types were statistically different according to their lexical-level (the mean word length, word frequency, imageability, concreteness, the third person pronouns), sentential-level (the mean sentence length, causal connectives, temporal connectives, noun density, FRE, FKGL), and discourse-level (type-token ratio, LSA cosines for all and adjacent sentences) features. This study provides some pedagogical implications for teaching various types of English summary writings.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the extent to which source texts’ types affect Korean EFL college learners’ summary writings in terms of lexical, sentential, and discourse-level features. About 51 summary writings of three genres (cause/effect and comparison/contrast expository texts and argumentative texts) were collected and analyzed using a computational assessment tool, Coh-Metrix. The results show that the participants’ summary writings in the three different text types were statistically different according to their lexical-level (the mean word length, word frequency, imageability, concreteness, the third person pronouns), sentential-level (the mean sentence length, causal connectives, temporal connectives, noun density, FRE, FKGL), and discourse-level (type-token ratio, LSA cosines for all and adjacent sentences) features. This study provides some pedagogical implications for teaching various types of English summary writings.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강경민, "한국 대학생 하위학습자들의 영어요약문쓰기 분석", 현대영어교육, 19(3), pp.35~47 (2018), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "텍스트 구조 학습이 한국어 쓰기에 미치는 영향 연구", 한국어교육, 18(3), pp.27~51 (2007), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김보림, "비교", 대조와 원인, Communication Sciences and Disorders, pp.2018, 23(4)[DOI]
- 류지수, "한국어 분석 시스템 Auto-Kohesion을 활용한 고등학교 국어교과서에 수록된 서사문과 논설문 비교 분석", 언어과학연구, (93), pp.25~51 (2020), 언어과학회
- 박민해, "텍스트구조와 질문유형에 따른 학령기 아동의 설명글 읽기이해 특성", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 23(1), pp.83~93 (2018), 한국언어청각임상학회[DOI]
- 배식한, "담론의 네 양식을 이용한 대학 글쓰기 교육 - 묘사, 서사, 설명, 논증의 필요성과 활용 방안", 리터러시 연구, 10(1), pp.239~268 (2019), 한국 리터러시 학회[DOI]
- 안수진, "한국인 대학생과 영어 원어민 대학생의 영어 설명문, 논설문의 코메트릭스 분석을 통한 비교", 새한영어영문학, 60(3), pp.177~205 (2018), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 윤효진, "초등 3~4학년 다문화가정 아동의 원인-결과와 비교-대조 설명담화 다시 말하기에 나타난 언어학적 비유창성 특성", Audiology and Speech Research, 15(4), pp.283~292 (2019), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 이혜연, "학령기 아동의 설명담화 말하기와 쓰기 발달 - 구문, 의미, 결속장치를 중심으로 -", 언어치료연구, 22(2), pp.145~161 (2013), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
- 전문기, "코메트릭스를 활용한 한국 대학생들의 영어 논설문과 설명문 요약문 비교 분석", 영어학, 19(3), pp.539~559 (2019), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 최윤희, "한국 영어 학습자들의 영어 읽기-쓰기 통합형 과업 수행에서 전략 사용과 과업 수행", 영어교과교육, 11(3), pp.87~107 (2012), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 최윤희, "국가영어능력평가시험 2급 쓰기 과업 유형이 한국 영어 학습자의 영어 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향", 영어학, 13(1), pp.161~186 (2013), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 황수정, "한국 고등학생의 영어 텍스트 요약에 영향을 미치는 요인들 : 사용언어, 능숙도, 텍스트 구조를 중심으로", 석사, 영어, pp.2002
- Beers, Scott F., "Writing Development in Four Genres from Grades Three to Seven : Syntactic Complexity and Genre Differentiation", Reading and Writing, 24(2), pp.183~202 (2011)
- Chen, Yuan-Shan, "A Genre-Based Approach to Teaching EFL Summary Writing", ELT Journal, 66(2), pp.184~192 (2012)
- 최연희, "Paraphrase Practices for Using Sources in L2 Academic Writing", 영어교육, 67(2), pp.51~79 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Graesser, Arthur C., "New Beginnings in Literary Studies", pp.72~88 (2008), Cambridge Scholars Press
- Hidi, Suzanne, "Producing Written Summaries : Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction", Review of Educational Research, 56(4), pp.473~493 (1986)
- Johns, Ann, "Genre Awareness for the Novice Academic Student : An Ongoing Quest", Language Teaching, 4(2), pp.237~252 (2008)
- Keck, Casey, "Copying, Paraphrasing, and Academic Writing Development : A Re-examination of L1 and L2 Summarization Practices", Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(1), pp.4~22 (2014)
- 김나영, "The Use of Paraphrase in L2 Writing with Two Factors: L2 Proficiency and Source Text Genre", 현대영어교육, 16(3), pp.71~97 (2015), 현대영어교육학회
- 이동주, "An Error Analysis of Korean University Students’ English Summary Writing", 영어어문교육, 22(4), pp.69~92 (2016), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 이은경, "Korean EFL Learners’ Use of I in English Argumentative Writing: Focusing on Genre-specific and Proficiency-specific Characteristics", 어학연구, 54(2), pp.357~381 (2018), 언어교육원[DOI]
- McGee, Iain, "The Pragmatics of Paragraphing English Argumentative Text", Journal of Pragmatics, 68, pp.40~72 (2014)
- Plakans, Lia, "Shaping a Score : Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Integrated Writing Performances", Language Testing, 36(2), pp.161~179 (2016)
- Shi, Ling, "Rewriting and Paraphrasing Source Texts in Second Language Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), pp.134~148 (2012)
- Yoshimura, Fumiko, "Another Possible Reason for Plagiarism : Task Representations of Summary Writing", The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 22(3), pp.1~17 (2018)
- Yu, Guoxing, "The Shifting Sands in the Effects of Source Text Summarizability on Summary Writing", Assessing Writing, 14(2), pp.116~137 (2009)
